El mediador ante lo sintético: supervisión humana y ética editorial en la era de la IA Generativa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34140/bjbv8n3-092Palavras-chave:
IA generativa, transparencia algorítmica, safekeeping, periodismo automatizado, marco operativo SAGEResumo
La irrupción de la Inteligencia Artificial Generativa (IA Gen) en el ecosistema mediático ha planteado una tensión crítica entre la eficiencia operativa y la integridad editorial; a pesar del consenso global sobre la necesidad de principios éticos, las redacciones carecen de protocolos ejecutables para garantizar la calidad informativa; es necesario un proceso de mediación entre las salas de redacción y el uso de la IA como herramienta de apoyo bajo la supervisión humana. Este artículo presenta una Revisión de Alcance (PRISMA-ScR) de la literatura académica (2015–2025), analizando la adopción, los mecanismos de supervisión humana (Human-in-the-Loop, HITL) y la transparencia algorítmica. Los resultados revelan una brecha de adopción marcada por la desconfianza profesional sobre todo en países de Latinoamérica, riesgos de pereza metacognitiva en editores y una insuficiencia en las herramientas de IA explicable (XAI). Como contribución principal, se propone el Marco Operativo SAGE-Media, una arquitectura de tres capas (Contextualización, Colaboración Iterativa y Custodia Forense) que operacionaliza la supervisión. Se concluye teóricamente que el rol del periodista debe evolucionar de gatekeeper (seleccionador de información) a safekeeper (custodio de la veracidad), redefiniendo la agencia humana como el único garante de confianza frente a la verosimilitud sintética.
Referências
ALVARADO GARCIA, A.; BRITTON, M. J.; DOSHI, D. M.; DE CHOUDHURY, M.; LE DANTEC, C. A. Data migrations: exploring the use of social media data as evidence for human rights advocacy. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, v. 4, CSCW3, p. 1–25, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1145/3434177.
AMIGO, L.; PORLEZZA, C. “Journalism will always need journalists”: the perceived impact of AI on journalism authority in Switzerland. Journalism Practice, v. 19, n. 10, p. 2266–2284, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2025.2487534.
ANDERS, A. D.; SPELTZ, E. D. Developing generative AI literacies through self-regulated learning: a human-centered approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 9, 100482, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100482.
CANAVILHAS, J.; IOSCOTE, F.; GONÇALVES, A. Artificial intelligence as an opportunity for journalism: insights from the Brazilian and Portuguese media. Social Sciences, v. 13, n. 11, 590, 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13110590.
CARVALHO, P.; AKHTAR, Z.; NOWBUTH, M.; BOAFO, Y. A.; AMANKWAA, E. F.; SPATARU, C. et al. A collaborative taxonomy of social media indicators for localised disaster response. Jambá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, v. 17, n. 2, a1839, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v17i2.1839.
DEEP, P.; BHARADHIDASAN, M.; KOCABALLI, A. B. “She was useful, but a bit too optimistic”: augmenting design with interactive virtual personas. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v. 205, 103646, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103646.
DE-LIMA-SANTOS, M.-F.; YEUNG, W. N.; DODDS, T. Guiding the way: a comprehensive examination of AI guidelines in global media. AI & Society, v. 40, p. 2585–2603, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01973-5.
DOMÍNGUEZ-PARTIDA, G.; GARCÍA-FÉLIX, E. M. Entre la eficiencia y la desinformación: la integración de la inteligencia artificial en el periodismo mexicano. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, v. 31, n. 1, p. 167–177, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5209/emp.99504.
ELKHODR, M.; GIDE, E. The SAGE framework for developing critical thinking and responsible generative AI use in cybersecurity education. Discover Education, v. 4, 517, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00935-3.
GARCÍA-MARÍN, D.; SUÁREZ-ÁLVAREZ, R.; GARCÍA-JIMÉNEZ, A. “Todo parece veraz”: credibilidad de la desinformación producida usando IA desde la perspectiva de los estudiantes de comunicación en España. Revista de Comunicación, v. 24, n. 2, p. 183–227, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.26441/rc24.2-2025-3872.
GETTO, G.; KELLEY, S.; VANCE, B. How to write with GenAI: a framework for using generative AI to automate writing tasks in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, p. 1–34, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816251332208.
GUPTA, A.; ALY, H.; TAKEUCHI, J. D.; KNIJNENBURG, B. P. Giving social media post authors more control over the translation of their posts enhances their user experience. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, v. 9, CSCW, Article 299, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1145/3757480.
JIANG, L.; CUI, Y.; LIU, R.; LUO, F. Evaluating the critical thinking of large language models: insights and limitations. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, v. 19, p. 1–14, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/18344909251406111.
KHURANA, J.; GUPTA, S.; HOMAVAZIR, Z.; DESAI, S.; SINGH, S. Community-driven AI models for cultural art education. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, v. 6, n. 1s, p. 39, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i1s.2025.66.
KIM, D.; KONG, J. Front-end AI vs. back-end AI: new framework for securing truth in communication during the generative AI era. Frontiers in Communication, v. 8, 1243474, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1243474.
MEZZADRI, D. The paradox of ethical AI-assisted research. Journal of Academic Ethics, v. 23, p. 2653–2667, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09671-7.
MUNORIYARWA, A.; DE-LIMA-SANTOS, M.-F. Generative AI and the future of news: examining AI’s agency, power, and authority. Journalism Practice, v. 19, n. 10, p. 2177–2188, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2025.2545448.
NASR, N. R.; TU, C.-H.; WERNER, J.; BAUER, T.; YEN, C.-J.; SUJO-MONTES, L. Exploring the impact of generative AI ChatGPT on critical thinking in higher education: passive AI-directed use or human-AI supported collaboration? Education Sciences, v. 15, 1198, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/educesci15091198.
NYAABA, M.; ZHAI, X. Developing a theory-grounded AI tool for the generation of culturally responsive lesson plans. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 9, 100474, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100474.
OLSEN, R. K.; SOLVOLL, M. K.; FUTSÆTER, K.-A. Gatekeepers as safekeepers—mapping audiences’ attitudes towards news media’s editorial oversight functions during the COVID-19 crisis. Journalism and Media, v. 3, p. 182–197, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia3010014.
ROSS, A.; KATZ, A. Using generative AI for large-scale qualitative analysis of social media posts to understand why people leave computer science. Journal of Engineering Education, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.70036.
SÁNCHEZ-GARCÍA, P.; DIEZ-GRACIA, A.; REPILADO MAYORGA, I.; JERÓNIMO, P. Media self-regulation in the use of AI: limitation of multimodal generative content and ethical commitments to transparency and verification. Journalism and Media, v. 6, n. 1, 29, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010029.
VANBRABANT, S.; EERLINGS, G.; ROVELO-RUIZ, G. A.; VANACKEN, D. ECHO: enhancing conversational explainable AI through tool-augmented language models. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, v. 9, EICS, Article 14, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1145/3734191.
