Industry 4.0 tools for regional development. Comparative case study on agribusinesses from Paraná, Brasil and Transilvania region, Romania

Autores

  • Alina Bianca Andreica
  • Lucir Reinaldo Alves
  • Isabela Romanha de Alcantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34140/bjbv6n4-011

Palavras-chave:

Industry 4.0, regional development, web site analysis

Resumo

Within the framework of regional development and the usage of Industry 4.0 tools, the paper compares 3 websites of agribusiness companies from Paraná state, Brazil, and 3 websites of agribusiness companies from Transylvania region, Romania. The results of our case study reveal specific characteristics of the studied regions, as well as strong and weak points of the studied websites. Consequent to the study, we make some improvement proposals for the studied agribusiness websites.

Referências

Alves, Lucir Reinaldo, Andreica, Alina Bianca, de Alcântara, Isabela Romanha, Using industry 4.0 tools for increasing competitiveness of Clusters in WesternParaná, Vol 6, No 8, 10.34117/bjdv6n8-179, Brazilian Journal of Development - 2525-8761, P 56648 - 56672, 2020

Andreica, A. (2009). IT Management. Cluj-Napoca: 2009

Agência Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Industrial. 2018. ‘Agenda brasileira para a Indústria 4.0’. Industria 4.0. 2018. http://industria40.gov.br/

Alves, Lucir Reinaldo. 2012. ‘Indicadores de Localização, Especialização e Estruturação Regional’. In Análise Regional: Metodologias e Indicadores, by Carlos Alberto Piacenti and Jandir Ferreira Lima. Curitiba: Camões

Bartodziej, Christoph Jan. 2017. The Concept Industry 4.0. Berlin, Germany: Springer Gabler

European Commission. 2018. ‘Capitalising on the Benefits of the 4th Industrial Revolution’, Research & Innovation Projects for Policy, 1 (Publications Office of the European Union): 36. https://doi.org/doi:10.2777/588385

Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany. 2014. ‘The New High-Tech Strategy Innovations for Germany’, 58

FIRJAN. 2016. ‘Panorama da inovação’. Cadernos SENAI de inovação

Friedmann, John R. P. 1956. ‘Locational Aspects of Economic Development’, Land Economics, 32 (3): 213–27. https://doi.org/doi:10.2307/3159465

Hermann, Mario, Tobias Pentek, and Boris Otto. 2015. ‘Design Principles for Industry 4.0 Scenarios: A Literature Review’. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.29269.22248

‘IPARDES - Instituto Paranaense de Desenvolvimento Economico e Social’. 2018. http://www.ipardes.pr.gov.br/

Kennedy, Scott. 2015. ‘Made in China 2025’. Center for Strategic & International Studies. 2015. https://www.csis.org/analysis/made-china-2025

Kurfuss, Thomas. 2014. ‘Industry 4.0: Manufacturing in the United States’. Office of Science and Technology Austria Washington. 2014. https://ostaustria.org/bridges-magazine/item/8310-industry-4-0

Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. 2018. ‘Valor Bruto da Produção Agropecuária (VBP)’. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. 2018 http://www.agricultura.gov.br/assuntos/politica-agricola/valor-bruto-da-producao-agropecuaria-vbp

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan. 2017. “Connected Industries” Tokyo Initiative 2017’. http://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2017/pdf/1002_004b.pdf

North, Douglass C. 1955. ‘Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth’. Journal of Political Economy 63 (3): 243–58. https://doi.org/10.1086/257668

Perroux, François. 1955. ‘Note Sur La Notion Des Poles de Croissance’, Économie Appliquée, 8: 307–20

Porter, Michael E. 1989. A Vantagem Competitiva Das Nações. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.

* 1998. ‘Clusters and the New Economics of Competition’, Harvard Business Review, 76 (6): 24

PWC. 2016. ‘2016 Global Industry 4.0 Survey’. www.pwc.com/industry40

Ranking, C. (11 de November de 2018). Sistema Ocepar. Fonte: Parana COoperativo Brasil: http://www.paranacooperativo.com.br/ppc/index.php/sistema-ocepar/comunicacao/2011-12-07-11-06-29/ultimas-noticias/104651-melhores-a-maiores-mais-tres-cooperativas-do-parana-destacam-se-no-ranking-da-revista-exame

Ranking, C. (2018, November 11). Sistema Ocepar. Retrieved from Parana COoperativo Brasil: http://www.paranacooperativo.com.br/ppc/index.php/sistema-ocepar/comunicacao/2011-12-07-11-06-29/ultimas-noticias/104651-melhores-a-maiores-mais-tres-cooperativas-do-parana-destacam-se-no-ranking-da-revista-exame

Romanian Companies, Romanian Finance Ministry https://mfinante.gov.ro/info-pj-selectie-nume-si-judet accessed November 209

Relação Anual de Informações Sociais. 2018. ‘Bases Estatísticas RAIS e CAGED’. 2018. http://bi.mte.gov.br/

Rocha, Alberto Alves da, and Isabela Barchet. 2015. ‘O RURAL E O URBANO NO ESTADO DO PARANÁ’. Boletim de Geografia 33 (2): 115. https://doi.org/10.4025/bolgeogr.v33i2.23401

Salkin, Ceren, Mahir Oner, Alp Ustundag, and Emre Cevikcan. 2018. ‘A Conceptual Framework for Industry 4.0’. In Industry 4.0: Managing the Digital Transformation, by Alp Ustundag and Emre Cevikcan. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-57870-5

Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. 1997. Teoria do desenvolvimento econômico: uma investigação sobre lucros, capital, crédito, juro e o ciclo econômico. São Paulo: Nova Cultural

‘Secretaria Da Fazenda’. 2018. 2018. http://www.fazenda.pr.gov.br/

Souza, Nali de Jesus. 2009. Desenvolvimento Regional. São Paulo: Atlas

Vieira Filho, José Eustáquio Ribeiro and Albert Fishlow. 2017. Agricultura e indústria no Brasil: Inovação e competitividade. Brasília, DF: IPEA

World Economic Forum. 2018. ‘Readiness for the Future of Production Report 2018'. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum’s System Initiative on Shaping the Future of Production. http://wef.ch/fopreadiness18

Downloads

Publicado

2024-11-11

Como Citar

Andreica, A. B., Alves, L. R., & Alcantara, I. R. de. (2024). Industry 4.0 tools for regional development. Comparative case study on agribusinesses from Paraná, Brasil and Transilvania region, Romania. Brazilian Journal of Business, 6(4), e74436 . https://doi.org/10.34140/bjbv6n4-011

Edição

Seção

Artigos