Os riscos da sustentabilidade nas cadeias de suprimentos: uma revisão da literatura
The risks of sustainability in supply chains: a review of the literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34140/bjbv4n4-035Palavras-chave:
riscos de sustentabilidade, revisão de literatura, desempenho em sustentabilidade, práticas de sustentabilidadeResumo
Introdução – Os temas envolvendo sustentabilidade tem chamado a atenção e preocupado a sociedade, seja em aspectos como as mudanças climáticas ou a precarização da condição de vida humana. A situação é agravada por práticas organizacionais oriundas de modelos mecanicistas. Nesse sentido, as preocupações com a sustentabilidade, chegam às cadeias de suprimentos, e se materializam por meio dos riscos de sustentabilidade.
Objetivo – Numa realidade cada vez mais intensiva em terceirização, esse artigo tem como objetivo contribuir para o aprimoramento do conhecimento sobre os riscos da sustentabilidade nas cadeias de suprimentos por meio de uma revisão da literatura.
Metodologia – A partir da base Scopus de artigos, foi aplicado um método de identificação, seleção, análise e síntese das pesquisas existentes sobre o assunto, com foco na garantia de uma revisão transparente, auditável e replicável.
Resultados - O estudo apresenta a análise de artigos explorando as principais contribuições. Na análise foram identificados os fatores ocultos, bem como abordagens aplicáveis a gestão dos riscos nas cadeias de suprimentos. A partir dessas análises, são apresentados os principais fatores como as práticas de sustentabilidade, questões culturais, institucionais ou de complexidade das cadeias.
Conclusões - O conhecimento desenvolvido nesse estudo permite um olhar sobre fatores ocultos na gestão dos riscos nas cadeias de suprimentos. A análise é baseada em critérios quantitativos e qualitativos. Foram identificadas importantes lentes teóricas que podem auxiliar a explicar o fenômeno dos riscos da sustentabilidade nas cadeias de suprimentos.
Referências
BALIGA, R.; RAUT, R.D.; KAMBLE, S.S. Sustainable supply chain management practices and performance. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 31, 1147-1182, 2019.
BAUMGARTNER, R. J., & EBNER, D. Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustainable Development, 18(2), 76-89, 2010.
BODE, C., WAGNER, S.M. Structural Drivers of Upstream Supply Chain Complexity and the Frequency of Supply Chain Disruptions, Journal of Operations Management, 2015.
BOZARTH, C., WARSING, D., FLYNN, B., FLYNN, E.J. The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance. Journal Oper Manag, 27 (1), 78-93, 2009.
BUSSE, C. Doing Well by Doing Good? The Self-interest of Buying Firms and Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Journal of Supply Chain Manag., 52(2), 28-47, 2016.
BUSSE, C., KACK, E BODE. Sustainability and the False Sense of Legitimacy. Journal of Business Logistics, 312-328, 2016.
CAO, Z., HUO, B., LI, Y., ZHAO, X. The impact of organizational culture on supply chain integration: a contingency and configuration. Supply Chain Manag. 20 (1), 24-41, 2015.
CHANDIO, A.; JIANG, Y.; AKRAM, W.; ADEEL, S.; IRFAN, M.; JAN, I. Addressing the effect of climate change in the framework of financial and technological development on cereal production in Pakistan. J Clean Prod 288:125637. 2021.
DAFT, R.L., Organization Theory and Design, 9th ed. South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH, 2006.
DENYER, D., TRANFIELD, T. Producing a systematic review. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organiz. Research Methods. London: Sage, 2009.
DIMAGGIO, P.; POWELL, W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in Organizational. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160, 1983.
DUBEY, R. ET AL Examining the effect of external pressures & organizational culture on shaping performance measurement systems for sustain. Int J of Prod Eco, 193: 63-76, 2017.
FAWCETT, S. E., ET AL. A Trail Guide to Publishing Success: Tips on Writing Influential Conceptual, Qualitative, and Survey Research. J. of Bus Log 35 (1): 1-16, 2014.
FENG, M, YU, W, WANG, X ET al. Green supply chain management and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27 (7). pp. 811-824, 2018.
FOERSTL, K., REUTER, C., HARTMANN, E., BLOME, C., Managing supplier sustainability risks in a dynamically. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 16 (2), 118e130, 2010.
GENG, R., MANSOURI, S. A., & AKTAS, E. The relationship between green supply chain management and performance. Int Journal of Production Economics, 183, 245-258, 2017.
GIANNAKIS, M., & PAPADOPOULOS, T. Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 455-470, 2016.
GOVINDAN, K., KHODAVERDI, R., VAFADARNIKJOO, A. Intuitionistic fuzzy based DEMATEL method for developing. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(20), 7207–7220, 2015.
GREEN, K., ZELBST, P., MEACHAM, J., BHADAURIA, V., Green supply chain management practices. Sup Chain Manag. Int. J. 17(3), 290–305, 2012.
GIANNAKIS, M., & PAPADOPOULOS, T. Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 455-470. (2016).
HALLIKAS, J., LINTUKANGAS, K., KÄHKÖNEN, A. The effects of sustainability practices on the performance of risk manag & purchasing. J Clean Prod, 263, 121579, 2020.
HOFMANN, H., BUSSE, C., BODE, C., & HENKE, M. Sustainability-Related Supply Chain Risks: Conceptualization and Management. Bus Strat & Envir, 23(3), 160-172, 2014.
JABBOUR, C. ET AL., Green product development and performance of Brazilian firms: measuring the role of human and technical aspects. J. Cleaner P. 87, 442–451, 2015.
JOYNER, B.; PAYNE, D. Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. J of Bus Eth, NY, 41(4), p. 297-311, 2002.
KAUPPI, K. Extending the use of institutional theory in operations and supply chain management research. Int Journal of Operations & Prod Manag, 33(10), 1318-1345, 2013.
LAARI, S., TÖYLI, J., SOLAKIVI, T. AND OJALA, L. Firm performance and customer-driven green supply chain manag, J of Cleaner Prod, 112(3), pp. 1960-1970, 2016.
LELÉ, S. Rethinking Sustainable Development, Current History, Philadelphia, Vol. 112, 2013.
LIANG, H., SARAF, N., HU, Q., XUE, Y. Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top manag. MIS Q. 31 (1), 59-87, 2007.
LIU, H., ET AL. The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm's intention to adopt internet-enabled supply chain. J. Oper. Manag. 28 (5), 372-384, 2010.
LIU, J., HU, H., TONG, X., ZHUA, Q. Behavioral and technical perspectives of green supply chain management practices, Transportation Research Part E, 140, 2020.
LUTHRA, S., GARG, D., HALEEM, A., The impacts of critical success factors for implementing green supply chain management. J. Cleaner Prod. 121, 142–158, 2016.
MANGLA, S.; KUMAR, P.; BARUA, M. Flexible Decision Approach for Analysing
Performance of Sustainable. Global J of Flex Systems Manag. 15(2), pp.113–130, 2014.
MANI, V. E DELGADO, C. Supply Chain Social Sustainability for Manufacturing. Measurement and Performance Outcomes. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, 2019.
MEIXELL, M., & LUOMA, P. Stakeholder pressure in sustainable supply chain management. I Journal of Physical Distrib & Logis Manag, 45(1/2): 69-89., 2015.
MOKTADIR, M., RAHMAN, T., RAHMAN, M., ALI, S., PAUL, S. Drivers to sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy: a perspective of leather industries in Bangladesh. J Clean Prod. 174, 1366e1380. 2018.
OSORIO, L. A.; LOBATO, M. O.; CASTILLO, X. A. Debates on sustainable development: towards a holistic view of reality. Environment, Development and Sustainability, New York, v. 7, n. 4, p. 501-518. 2005.
PORTER, M. E.; KRAMER, M. Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 2006.
PURVIS, B., MAO, Y., & ROBINSON, D. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681-695. 2019.
QUINN, R.E., ROHRBAUGH, J., A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Manag. Sci. 29 (3), 363-377, 1983.
ROMANO, A. L. Um estudo sobre indicadores de sustentabilidade corporativa: análise de ferramentas e verificação da aplicação numa empresa de material de escritório. 2010. 173 f. Dissertação de Mestrado em Desenvolvimento Regional – Centro Universitário de Araraquara, Araraquara, 2010.
ROMANO, A. L., TEIXEIRA, I. T., ALVES FILHO, A. G., HELLENO, A. L. Avaliação da sustentabilidade corporativa e da cultura organizacional–survey no setor brasileiro de cosméticos. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração 9 (1), 142-158, 2015.
ROMANO, A.L., FERREIRA, L.M.D.F. How to transform sustainability practices into organizational benefits? The role of different cultural characteristics. Oper Manag Res, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00287-3
SARKIS, J., ZHU, Q., & LAI, K. H. An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Prod Economics, 130(1), 1-15., 2011.
SCOTT, W. R. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (4a). London: Sage Publications Ltd., 2014.
SHAO, L.; ZHANG, H.; IRFAN, M. How public expenditure in recreational and cultural industry and socioeconomic status caused environmental sustainability in OECD countries? Econ Res Istraživanja 1–18. 2021.
TOLBERT, P.S., HALL, R.H., Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes, 10th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2009.
VACHON, S., KLASSEN, R., An exploratory investigation of the effects of supply chain complexity on delivery performance. IEEE Trans on Engin Manag. 49 (3), 218-230, 2002.
ZHU, Q., ET AL. Circular economy practices among Chinese manufacturers varying in environmental? Oriented supply chain. Journal of Env Manag, 91(6), 1324-1331, 2010.
