Avaliação de Risco de Incêndio para elaboração de Estratégias de Combate a Incêndio para o sistema de tratamento de água produzida (deoiling) de uma unidade offshore
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv11n6-082Keywords:
incêndio, segurança, índices, APR, offshoreAbstract
Todos os processos industriais devem ser protegidos por uma estratégia de combate a incêndios eficaz e atual. Especialmente em sistemas offshore, que contêm uma série de módulos, que são estruturas de alto risco, cada uma das quais requer um nível de avaliação apropriado e especializado. Uma estratégia de combate a incêndios deve considerar oito elementos-chave, que são a base para a determinação da metodologia semiquantitativa de avaliação do Índice de Risco de Incêndio. O processo permite a comparação de uma estratégia de combate a incêndios real com uma análsie base pré-determinada, neste artigo uma análise preliminar de riscos (APR) aplicada a um sistema de tratamento de água oleosa (deoiling) teve alguns cenários reavaliados para proposição de ações de mitigação dos riscos relacionados a incêndio, em especial, no que envolve danos a pessoas.
References
ALKIŞ, Saadet e AKSOY, Ercüment e AKPINAR, Kudret. Risk assessment of industrial fires for surrounding vulnerable facilities using a multi-criteria decision support approach and gis. Fire, v. 4, n. 3, 1 Set 2021. Acesso em: 16 jun 2025.
ARGYROPOULOS, C. D. e colab. A hazards assessment methodology for large liquid hydrocarbon fuel tanks. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, v. 25, n. 2, p. 329–335, Mar 2012. Acesso em: 16 jun 2025.
BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION. Application of fire safety engineering principles to the design of buildings-Part 7: Probabilistic risk assessment. [S.l: s.n.], 2019.
CCPS. Guidelines for Implementing Process Safety Management. [S.l.]: Wiley, 2016.
CHEMICAL CENTER FOR PROCESS SAFETY. Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety. [S.l.]: Wiley, 2007.
CRIPPA, C. e colab. Fire risk management system for safe operation of large atmospheric storage tanks. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, v. 22, n. 5, p. 574–581, 1 Set 2009. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0950423009000771>. Acesso em: 16 jun 2025.
CVETKOVIĆ, Vladimir M. e colab. Fire safety behavior model for residential buildings: Implications for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, v. 76, 15 Jun 2022. Acesso em: 16 jun 2025.
FATURECHI, Reza e colab. Risk-based models for emergency shelter and exit design in buildings. Annals of Operations Research, v. 262, n. 1, p. 185–212, 1 Mar 2018. Acesso em: 16 jun 2025.
FRANCHINI, Andrea e GALASSO, Carmine e TORERO, Jose L. Optimising the inherent fire capacity of structures. Fire Safety Journal, v. 141, 1 Dez 2023. Acesso em: 16 jun 2025.
LUAN, Guohua e colab. Experimental study on boilover fire characteristics and uncertainty of high water-content crude oil. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, v. 94, p. 105553, 1 Abr 2025. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0950423025000117>. Acesso em: 16 jun 2025.
MEDVED, Sašo. Buildings Fires and Fire Safety. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering, p. 407–451, 2022. Acesso em: 16 jun 2025.
PORTERIE, Bernard e colab. A Simulation Tool to Quantify the Consequences of Fires on Board Ro-Ro Ships. Fire Technology, v. 60, n. 1, p. 459–499, 1 Jan 2024. Acesso em: 16 jun 2025.
SHEBEKO, Yu N. e colab. Fire and explosion risk assessment for large-scale oil export terminal. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, v. 20, n. 4–6, p. 651–658, 1 Jul 2007. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0950423007000393>. Acesso em: 16 jun 2025.
THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION. NFPA 551: Guide for the Evaluation of Fire Risk Assessments (2022). . [S.l: s.n.]. , 2022
XIE, Shuyi e colab. A novel risk evaluation method for fire and explosion accidents in oil depots using bow-tie analysis and risk matrix analysis method based on cloud model theory. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, v. 215, p. 107791, 1 Nov 2021. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S095183202100315X>. Acesso em: 16 jun 2025.
YILMAZ, Fatih e colab. Analysis of the Risks arising from Fire Installations in Workplaces using the Ranking Method. Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, v. 10, n. 4, p. 5914–5920, 1 Ago 2020. Acesso em: 16 jun 2025.
YUAN, Jie e colab. The study of burning behaviors and quantitative risk assessment for 0# diesel oil pool fires. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, v. 72, p. 104568, 1 Set 2021. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0950423021001789>. Acesso em: 16 jun 2025.
ZHANG, Xuanrui e colab. Research progress and prospects of risk assessment methods for oil and gas development. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, v. 253, p. 213992, 1 Out 2025. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2949891025003501>. Acesso em: 16 jun 2025.
