Evaluation and implementation of Modern Arnis learning packets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv11n1-028Keywords:
instructional materials (IM), learning packets, modern arnisAbstract
Instructional materials, such as learning packets, undergo a systematic scrutiny process to ensure their efficacy during implementation. This qualitative research study aimed to assess feedback from peer reviewers and the experiences of learners in utilizing learning packets. The study included three peer reviewers with expertise in Education and Physical Education (PE), as well as six PE learners enrolled in the fourth quarter of School Year 2022-23. The peer reviewers diligently evaluated the learning packets, focusing on content, pedagogy, language, illustration, and perceived inclusion. During the implementation phase, the six PE learners, particularly those engaged in Modern Arnis, actively participated. The findings emphasized the significance of a systematic evaluation process that comprehensively scrutinizes all aspects of the learning packet to ensure its effectiveness during implementation. It was also found crucial to engage peer reviewers with expertise in Education and Physical Education during the evaluation process. Furthermore, the learners' experiences revealed three pivotal themes: learning through different approaches, active involvement in the learning process, and overall learning satisfaction. Building upon these findings, the researcher enhanced the learning packet to cater to the diverse needs of learners and enhanced their engagement within the Modern Arnis class. Moreover, this study highlights the importance of evaluating and effectively implementing learning packets to meet the dynamic requirements of learners. Future researchers in Physical Education are encouraged to explore other sports-related learning packets and evaluate their implementation.
References
ALEXANDRA, V.; EHRHART, K. H.; RANDEL, A. E. Cultural intelligence, perceived inclusion, and cultural diversity in workgroups. Personality and Individual Differences, v. 168, p. 110285, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110285.
ANCHO, I. V. Towards a Culturally Responsive Foreign Language Teaching. Journal, v. 4, n. 4, 2020.
ANDERSON, L.; CLARK, B.; DAVIES, P.; JOHNSON, M. Instructional Design: Theories, Models, and Strategies. Routledge, 2021.
ASRIZAL; AMRAN, A.; ANANDA, A.; FESTIYED, F.; SUMARMIN, R. The development of integrated science instructional materials to improve students’ digital literacy in scientific approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, v. 7, n. 4, p. 442–450, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.13613.
BEETHAM, H.; SHARPE, R. Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. Routledge, 2007.
BROWN, H. D. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Pearson, 2018.
BUGLER, T.; MCENTEE, K.; DONLON, E. Exploring a teacher design team approach to curriculum materials development. Irish Educational Studies, v. 36, n. 1, p. 55-73, 2017.
BUGLER, D.; MARPLE, S.; BURR, E.; CHEN-GADDINI, M.; FINKELSTEIN, N. How teachers judge the quality of instructional materials. WestEd: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2017.
CHIEN, C.-W. Influence of differentiated instruction workshop on Taiwanese elementary school English teachers’ activity design. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, v. 5, n. 2, p. 270, 2015.
CLARK, R. C. e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. Wiley, 2017.
DAVIES, C. Instructional Techniques in Higher Education. Routledge, 2019.
DECI, E. L.; RYAN, R. M. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, v. 11, n. 4, p. 227-268, 2000.
DRESSER, J. F. D. Arnis Book: The fundamentals of Philippine national sport volume 1, 2022.
DRESSER, J. F.; POTANE, J. Fundamentals of Arnis Self-Learning Module: Experts’ validation and learners’ feedback. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, v. 2, n. 2, p. 41–54, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4056383.
FAGO, C. State leaders in providing common core-aligned instructional materials, 2014.
FAIGENBAUM, A. D.; BUSH, J. A.; MCLOONE, R. P.; KRECKEL, M. C.; FARRELL, A.; RATAMESS, N. A.; KANG, J. Benefits of strength and skill-based training during primary school physical education. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, v. 29, n. 5, p. 1255–1262, 2015.
FELDER, R. M.; BRENT, R. Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, v. 95, n. 1, p. 4-23, 2016.
GIJBELS, D.; DOCHY, F.; VAN DEN BOSSCHE, P.; SEGERS, M. Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, v. 15, n. 1, p. 67-91, 2005.
GORBI IRAWAN, A.; NYOMAN PADMADEWI, N.; PUTU ARTINI, L. Instructional materials development through 4D model. SHS Web of Conferences, v. 42, p. 00086, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200086.
HEHIR, T.; GRINDAL, T.; FREEMAN, B.; LAMOREAU, R.; BORQUAYE, Y.; BURKE, S. A summary of the evidence on inclusive education. Instituto Alana, p. 1–34, 2016. Disponível em: http://alana.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/A_Summary_of_the_evidence_on_inclusive_education.pdf.
HMELO-SILVER, C. E.; DUNCAN, R. G.; CHINN, C. A. Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, v. 42, n. 2, p. 99-107, 2007.
ICHSAN, I.; SAEFUDIN, A.; MEISARAH, F. Constructivism Philosophy in Developing Prospective Educators on the Implementation of Merdeka Belajar in Vocational Schools. International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science, v. 2, n. 01, p. 306–319, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.99075/ijevss.v2i01.173.
ISMAJLI, H.; IMAMI-MORINA, I. Differentiated instruction: Understanding and applying interactive strategies to meet the needs of all the students. International Journal of Instruction, v. 11, n. 3, p. 207–218, 2018.
JOHNSON, D. W.; JOHNSON, R. T.; SMITH, K. A. Cooperative Learning: Improving University Instruction by Basing Practice on validated Theory. Wiley, 2022.
KATTEL, M. Analysis of English Textbook of Grade Ten. March, p. 1–19, 2021.
KONSTANTINOU-KATZI, P.; TSOLAKI, E.; MELETIOU-MAVROTHERIS, M.; KOUTSELINI, M. Differentiation of teaching and learning mathematics: an action research study in tertiary education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, v. 44, n. 3, p. 332–349, 2013. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.714491.
MARLINI, C. Developing pqrst (preview, question, read, summarize and test) strategy-based intensive reading instructional materials for the students in grade iv of elementary school, 2016.
MEYAD, N. A.; ROSLAN, S.; ABDULLAH, M. C.; HAJIMAMING, P. The effect of differentiated learning method in teaching Arabic language on students motivation. Journal of Social Science Research, v. 5, n. 1, p. 671–678, 2014. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.24297/jssr.v5i1.6651.
PENG, J.; ZHANG, Y.; WEI, L. A review of self-directed learning research. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1-14, 2018.
PURWITANINGRUM, R.; PRAHMANA, R. C. I. Developing instructional materials on mathematics logical thinking through the Indonesian realistic mathematics education approach. International Journal of Education and Learning, v. 3, n. 1, p. 13–19, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v3i1.178.
RICHEY, R.; KLEIN, J.; TRACEY, M. The instructional design knowledge base. 2011.
ROBERTS, K. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, 2019.
ROBINSON, L.; MALDONADO, N.; WHALEY, J. Perceptions about Implementation of Differentiated Instruction. Online Submission, 2014.
SITOVSKYI, A.; MAKSYMCHUK, B.; KUZMENKO, V.; NOSKO, Y.; KORYTKO, Z.; BAHINSKA, O.; MARCHENKO, O.; NIKOLAENKO, V.; MATVIIICHUK, T.; SOLOVYOV, V.; KHURTENKO, O.; SLYUSARENKO, N.; ZHOROVA, I.; MAKSYMCHUK, I. Differentiated approach to physical education of adolescents with different speed of biological development. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, v. 19, n. 3, p. 1532–1543, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.03222.
SMITH, M. K. Curriculum Theory and Practice. Routledge, 2019.
SUSILAWATI; MASROBI. An Evaluation Of English Textbook Entitled “Kiddie 1” For Kindergarten In English Study Centre. International Undergraduate Conference on English Education, v. 1, n. 1, p. 163–168, 2022.
SWELLER, J.; VAN MERRIENBOER, J. J.; PAAS, F. G. Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, v. 31, n. 2, p. 261-292, 2019.
TAN, K. E.; RAPPA, N. A.; YEO, L. Guiding self-directed learning and collaborative learning through a blended learning approach. Interactive Learning Environments, v. 27, n. 6, p. 732-746, 2019.
TORRENCE, B. S.; WATTS, L. L.; MULHEARN, T. J.; TURNER, M. R.; TODD, E. M.; MUMFORD, M. D.; CONNELLY, S. Curricular Approaches in Research Ethics Education: Reflecting on More and Less Effective Practices in Instructional Content. Accountability in Research, v. 24, n. 5, p. 269–296, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1276452.
WENINGER, C. Visualizing the interconnectedness of multimodal meaning-making resources in pedagogic material design. Journal of Multimodal Communication Studies, v. 5, n. 1-2, p. 18-35, 2018.
