Characterization of Bacillus velezensis DCJ 2 isolated from the rhizosphere soil of Aglaonema ‘Maria’ and investigation of its plant growth-promoting effects

Authors

  • Mahara Hetti Arachchige Deepika Subhashini
  • Chandrika Malkanthi Nanayakkara
  • Dassanayake Mudiyanselage Jayantha Bandara Senanayake

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv10n5-038

Keywords:

Aglaonema ‘Maria’, PGPR, Bacillus velezensis DCJ 2, pot experiment, soil drench, foliar spray

Abstract

Aglaonema ‘Maria’ is one of the key foliage plants that has gained high demand in foreign destinations in the last few years. This study was conducted to characterize Bacillus velezensis DCJ 2, assess its plant growth promotion effect and investigate the effectiveness of different delivery methods of the bacterial inoculum for the growth promotion of Aglaonema ‘Maria’. In this context, DCJ 2, isolated from the rhizosphere soil of A. Maria was screened to investigate its potential as a plant growth-promoting bacterium. The pure culture of DCJ 2 maintained on nutrient agar was utilized for morphological, biochemical and physiological examinations. The molecular characterization of the strain was performed with different primer pairs targeting 16SrRNA, gyrA, pgsB and sugar kinase genes of DCJ 2. A pot experiment was carried out to investigate the plant growth promotion effect. It was conducted in the greenhouse as per the complete randomized block design with eight treatments and five replicates. . Healthy plants of A. ‘Maria’ established in field soil and solarized soil were treated with 100 ml of the suspension of the DCJ 2 at the rate of 10 8 CFU/ml either as a soil drench or foliar spray. The partial 16SrRNA, gyrA, pgsB and sugar kinase gene sequences of DCJ 2, BLAST searched in the NCBI database revealed that it has a high similarity to Bacillus velezensis. The pot experiment showed that the application of strain DCJ 2 as a soil drench to solarized soil (Treatment 6) yielded a significant increase in growth parameters at p=0.05. Based on molecular analysis, morphological, biochemical, and physiological reactions, DCJ 2 was identified as Bacillus velezensis. This study revealed that B. velezensis DCJ 2 has the potential to boost the growth of A. Maria and hence serve as a base for developing a biofertilizer.

References

Akarapisan A., Khamtham J., & Kositratana W. (2020). Characterization of antagonistic potential of Bacillus velezensis SK71 against the bacterial brown spot on a terrestrial orchid (Habenaria lindleyana). International Journal of Agricultural Technology 16(1): 1-18.

Ambawade M. S., & Pathade G. R. (2015). Production of gibberellic acid by Bacillus siamensis BE 76 isolated from banana plant (Musa spp.). Int J Sci Res 4(7): 394-398.

Azabou M. C., Gharbi Y., Medhioub I., Ennouri K., Barham H., Tounsi S. & Triki M. A. (2020). The endophytic strain Bacillus velezensis OEE1: An efficient biocontrol agent against Verticillium wilt of olive and a potential plant growth promoting bacteria. Biological Control 142: 104168. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104168

Basnayake T.S.K.(2022). Women Entrepreneurs and Poverty Alleviation in Floriculture of Colombo District in Sri Lanka FGS - CJMR Journal - March & November 2022 - Volume 07 - No. 01 & 02 (84 - 110).

Bonanomi G., Chiurazzi M., Caporaso S., Del Sorbo G., Moschetti G. & Felice S. (2008). Soil solarization with biodegradable materials and its impact on soil microbial communities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40(8): 1989-1998. DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.02.009

Candido V., D’Addabbo T., & Basile M. et al. (2008) Greenhouse soil solarization: effect on weeds, nematodes and yield of tomato and melon. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 28: pp. 221–230. DOI:10.1051/agro:2007053

Chaube H. S.& Dhananjay S. (2003) Soil solarization: an ecofriendly and effective technique for the management of soil borne pests in nurseries. Appl Bot Abstr 23:191–203.

Chen J., Devanand P. S., Norman D. J., Henny R. J., & Chao C. T. (2004). Genetic relationships of Aglaonema Species and Cultivars Inferred from AFLP markers. Annals of Botany 93(2): 157-166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch025

Chen L., Shi H., Heng J., Wang D. & Bian, K. (2019). Antimicrobial, plant growth-promoting and genomic properties of the peanut endophyte Bacillus velezensis LDO2. Microbiological research 218: 41-48.

Chowdhury S. P., Hartmann A., Gao X. & Borriss R. (2015). Biocontrol mechanism by root-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 – a review. Frontiers in Microbiology 6: 137829.

Chun J. & Bae K. S. (2000). Phylogenetic analysis of Bacillus subtilis and related taxa based on partial gyrA gene sequences. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 78: 123-127.

Collins D. P., & Jacobsen B. J. (2003). Optimizing a Bacillus subtilis isolate for biological control of sugar beet Cercospora leaf spot. Biological control 26(2): 153-161.

D’Addabbo T., Miccolis V., Basile M., Candido V. (2010). Soil Solarization and Sustainable Agriculture. In: Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Sociology, Organic Farming, Climate Change and Soil Science. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3333-8_9

Dunlap C. A. (2019). Taxonomy of registered Bacillus spp. strains used as plant pathogen antagonists. . Biological control 134: 82-86.

Fan B., Wang C., Song X., Ding X., Wu L., Wu H. & Borriss R. (2018). Bacillus velezensis FZB42 in 2018: the gram-positive model strain for plant growth promotion and biocontrol. . Frontiers in microbiology 9: 2491.

Fatima R., Mahmood T., Moosa A., Aslam M. N., Shakeel M. T., Maqsood A. & Al‐Shehri M. (2023). Bacillus thuringiensis CHGP12 uses a multifaceted approach for the suppression of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris and to enhance the biomass of chickpea plants. Pest Management Science, 79(1): 336-348.

Gunasekara S. (2014).Floriuture_Industry_of_Sri_Lanka, Acedemia education (on line) available at: https://www.academia.edu/6022296/[Accessed 09 November 2023].

García de Salamone I. E., Hynes R. K., & Nelson L. M. (2001). Cytokinin production by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and selected mutants. Canadian Journal of microbiology 47(5): 404-411.

Gholami A., Shahsavani S., & Nezarat S. (2009). The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on germination, seedling growth and yield of maize. International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering 3(1):9-14.

Hasan N., Khan I. U., Farzand A., Heng Z., Moosa A., Saleem M. & Canming T. (2022). Bacillus altitudinis HNH7 and Bacillus velezensis HNH9 promote plant growth through upregulation of growth‐promoting genes in upland cotton. Journal of Applied Microbiology 132(5):3812-3824. http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/blastn.

Hassan M. K., McInroy J. A., Jones J., Shantharaj D., Liles M. R. & Kloepper J. W. (2019). Pectin-rich amendment enhances soybean growth promotion and nodulation mediated by Bacillus velezensis strains. Plants 8(5): 120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8050120

Huang R., Feng H., Xu Z., Zhang N., Liu Y., Shao J. & Zhang R. (2022). Identification of adhesins in plant beneficial rhizobacteria Bacillus velezensis SQR9 and their effect on root colonization. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 35(1): 64-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-09-21-0234-R

Kanaan H., Frenk S., Raviv M., Medina S. & Minz D. (2018). Long and short term effects of solarization on soil microbiome and agricultural production. Applied Soil Ecology 124: 54-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.10.026

Khan M. S., Gao J., Chen X., Zhang M., Yang F., Du Y., & Zhang X. (2020). The endophytic bacteria Bacillus velezensis Lle-9, isolated from Lilium leucanthum, harbors antifungal activity and plant growth-promoting effects. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 30(5): 668. DOI: 10.5423/PPJ.NT.03.2021.0053

Kim Y. C., Leveau J., McSpadden Gardener B. B., Pierson E. A., Pierson III L. S. & Ryu C. M. . (2011). The multifactorial basis for plant health promotion by plant-associated bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 77(5): 1548-1555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01867-10

Liu F., He Q., Li W., Wu M. & He B. (2022). Complete Genome Analysis of Bacillus Velezensis ES2-4: A Novel Bacillus Strain with Potential for Biofitilizer and Biocontrol Agent. researchsquare. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1803347/v2

Liu Y., Štefanič P., Miao Y., Xue Y., Xun W., Zhang N. & Mandic-Mulec I.(2022). Housekeeping gene gyrA, a potential molecular marker for Bacillus ecology study. AMB Express 12(1): 133. DOI: 10.1186/s13568-022-01477-9

Mekonnen H. & Kibret M. (2021). The roles of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in sustainable vegetable production in Ethiopia. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 8(1): 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-021-00213-y

Meng Q., Jiang H. & Hao J. J. (2016). Effects of Bacillus velezensis strain BAC03 in promoting plant growth. Biological Control 98: 18-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCONTROL.2016.03.010

Nanjani S., Soni R., Paul D. & Keharia H. (2022). Genome analysis uncovers the prolific antagonistic and plant growth-promoting potential of endophyte Bacillus velezensis K1. Gene 836: 146671. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2022.146671

Perrine F. M., Rolfe B. G., Hynes M. F. & Hocart C. H. (2004). Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of indoleacetic acid and tryptophan following aqueous chloroformate derivatisation of Rhizobium exudates. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 42(9): 723-729. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.07.008

Pinkerton J. N., Ivors K. L., Reeser P. W., Bristow P. R. & Windom G. E. (2002). The use of soil solarization for the management of soilborne plant pathogens in strawberry and red raspberry production. Plant Disease 86(6): 645-651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.6.645

Qiao J., Yu X. & Liang X. et al. Addition of plant-growth-promoting Bacillus subtilis PTS-394 on tomato rhizosphere has no durable impact on composition of root microbiome. BMC Microbiol 17: 131 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-1039-x.

Rabbee M. F., Ali M. S., Choi J., Hwang B. S., Jeong S. C. & Baek K. H. . (2019). Bacillus velezensis: a valuable member of bioactive molecules within plant microbiomes. Molecules 24(6): 1046. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24061046

Rahma A. A., Suryanti S. S. & Joko T. (2020). Research Article Induced Disease Resistance and Promotion of Shallot Growth by Bacillus velezensis B-27. Pak. J. Biol. Sci 23(9): 1113-1121. DOI:10.3923/pjbs.2020.1113.1121

Ruíz K.A. B., Bustos P., Santamaria R.I., González V., Cristiano-Fajardo S.A., Barrera-Ortíz S., Mezo-Villalobos M., Aranda-Ocampo S., Guevara-García Á.A., Galindo E.& Serrano-Carreón L. Bacillus velezensis 83 a bacterial strain from mango phyllosphere, useful for biological control and plant growth promotion. DOI: 10.1186/s13568-020-01101-8.

Shin J. H., Park B. S., Kim H. Y., Lee K. H. & Kim, K. S. (2021). Antagonistic and plant growth-promoting effects of Bacillus velezensis BS1 isolated from rhizosphere soil in a pepper field. The Plant Pathology Journal 37(3): 307. DOI: 10.5423/PPJ.NT.03.2021.0053

Soad A. Algam, Xie Guan-lin Jef. Coosemans, (2005). Delivery Methods for Introducing Endophytic Bacillus into Tomato and Their Effect on Growth Promotion and Suppression of Tomato Wilt. Plant Pathology Journal 4: 69-74. DOI: 10.3923/ppj.2005.69.74

Sofi T. A., Tewari A. K., Razdan V. K. & Koul V. K. (2013). Long term effect of soil solarization on soil properties and cauliflower vigor Phytoparasitica ISSN 0334-2123 42(1):11(2014) DOI: 10.1007/s12600-013-0331-z

Stapleton J. J. (2000). Soil solarization in various agricultural production systems. Crop Protection 19(8-10): 837-841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00111-3

Stapleton J. J., Cheryl A. Wilen. & Richard H. Molinar. (2019).Soil Solarization for Gardens & LandscapesSoil Solarization for Gardens & Landscapes Management UC ANR Publication 7414.

Tahir H. A., Gu Q., Wu H., Raza W., Hanif A., Wu L. & Gao X. (2017). Plant growth promotion by volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus subtilis SYST2. Frontiers in Microbiology 8: 171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00171

Tahir H.A., Gu Q., Wu H., Niu Y., Huo R. & Gao X. (2017). Bacillus volatiles adversely affect the physiology and ultra-structure of Ralstonia solanacearum and induce systemic resistance in tobacco against bacterial wilt. Scientific reports 7(1), 40481 DOI: 10.1038/srep40481

Teixeira G. M., Mosela M., Nicoletto M. L. A., Ribeiro R. A., Hungria M., Youssef K. & de Oliveira A. G. (2021). Genomic insights into the antifungal activity and plant growth-promoting ability in Bacillus velezensis CMRP 4490. Frontiers in microbiology 11: 618415. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.618415

Torres M., Llamas I., Torres B., Toral L., Sampedro I. & Bejar, V. (2019). Growth promotion on horticultural crops and antifungal activity of Bacillus velezensis XT1. Applied Soil Ecology 150: 103453. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.103453

Tamura K, Stecher G, & Kumar S. (2021). MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38:3022-3027 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab120

Vejan P., Abdullah R., Khadiran T., Ismail S. & Nasrulhaq Boyce A. (2016). Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability—a review. Molecules 21(5): 573. DOI: 10.3390/molecules21050573

Wang C., Zhao D., Qi G., Mao Z., Hu X., Du B. & Ding Y. (2020). Effects of Bacillus velezensis FKM10 for Promoting the Growth of Malus hupehensis Rehd. and Inhibiting Fusarium verticillioides. Frontiers in microbiology 10: 2889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02889

Wang S., Sun L., Zhang W., Chi F., Hao X., Bian J. & Li Y. (2020). Bacillus velezensis BM21, a potential and efficient biocontrol agent in control of corn stalk rot caused by Fusarium graminearum. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 30: 1-10. DOI :https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-0209-6

Weisburg W. G., Barns S. M., Pelletier D. A. & Lane D. J. (1991). 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. Journal of bacteriology 173(2) : 697-703. DOI: 10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991

Wilson K. (2001). Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. Current protocols in molecular biology, Chapter 2. DOI: 10.1002/0471142727.mb0204s56

Ye M., Tang X., Yan R., Zhang H., Li F., Tao F., & Wang Z. (2018). Characteristics and application of a novel species of Bacillus: Bacillus velezensis. ACS chemical biology 13(3): 500-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.7b00874

Yong X., Zhang R., Zhang N., Chen Y., Huang X., Zhao J. & Shen Q. (2013). Development of a specific real-time PCR assay targeting the poly-γ-glutamic acid synthesis gene, pgsB, for the quantification of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in solid-state fermentation. Bioresource Technology 129: 477-484.

Zaid D. S., Cai S., Hu C., Li Z. & Li Y. (2022). Comparative genome analysis reveals phylogenetic identity of Bacillus velezensis HNA3 and genomic insights into its plant growth promotion and biocontrol effects. Microbiology Spectrum 10(1): e02169-21. DOI:10.1128/spectrum.02169-21

Zhang Y., Ga, X., Wang S., Zhu C., Li R. & Shen, Q. (2018). Application of Bacillus velezensis NJAU-Z9 Enhanced Plant Growth Associated with Efficient Rhizospheric Colonization Monitored by qPCR with Primers Designed from the Whole Genome Sequence. Current Microbiology 75(12): 1574–1583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-018-1563-4

Downloads

Published

2024-05-13

How to Cite

Subhashini, M. H. A. D., Nanayakkara, C. M., & Senanayake, D. M. J. B. (2024). Characterization of Bacillus velezensis DCJ 2 isolated from the rhizosphere soil of Aglaonema ‘Maria’ and investigation of its plant growth-promoting effects. Brazilian Journal of Development, 10(5), e69660 . https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv10n5-038

Issue

Section

Original Papers