Impact of climatic changes on fish biodiversity and their conservation (India)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv10n4-069Keywords:
climatic change, fish biodiversity, Gandak river, restoration, conservationAbstract
India, having numerous rivers, is enriched with varieties of flora and fauna in and around it. The total catchment area of the river basin is about 2.5 lakh km2 or 81% of the total geographical area of India. All over India, there are remarkably diverse ranges of aquatic life. 950 freshwater and 1570 marine fish species, a total of 2500, are found which occupies 1.5% of the world's total fish species. Fish is full of nutrition and a prime source of aquatic food. But in this fast-developing urbanization era: anthropogenic activities, industrialization, population, elevated air temperature, global warming, drought, flood, pollution, and monsoonal ups and downs equally put pressure on the climate, ecosystem, society, and economy, increasing pressure on all livelihoods and food supplies, including those in the fisheries and aquaculture sector. The actual properties of climates are being changed very rapidly. Fish availability in the monsoonal season is more than in the summer season. Therefore, the present study aims to determine the present status of fish biodiversity of river Gandak and the significant role of climate change on them. The study was conducted from January 2022 to August 2022 in Gandak river. Overall, 25 individuals of fishes were recorded and characterized which belonging to 12 families, Cyprinidae (32%) was most abundant, followed by Channidae (12%), then Bagridae, Siluridae, Cobitidae, Ambassidae with 8%; Notopteradae, Heteropneustidae, Claridae, Belontidae, Belonidae, Nandidae occupied only 4%. families. Aspidoporia morar and Puntius species, Labeo calbasu and Labeo bata were in good quality while Labeo rohita and Catla catla were not found in good amounts. A good number of ornamental fishes were also recorded. But after these surveys, it was seen that there was a significant decline in their population that also affect other depending organisms along with local fishermen directly or indirectly. So, the need of the hour is conservation which involves restoration of habitat, cleaning of rivers, sewage treated water, mass awareness program to people for water conservation, sustainable use of river water and its resources and these will help the fishermen in livelihood and earning along with the nutritional need of the society.
References
Burt. J. M., Hinch. S.G. and Patterson. D. A (2011). The importance of parentage in assessing temperature effects on fish early life history: A review of the experimental literature. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries (2011) 21:377-406.
David, A. (1963). Report on fisheries survey of the river Gandak (North Bihar). Survey report No. 1. Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR), Barrackpore, Kolkata, India.
Donaldson. L., Wilson. R. J., Ilya M. D. and Maclean (2016). Old concepts, new challenges: adapting landscape-scale conservation to the twenty-first century. Biodiversity Conserv (2017) 26:527-552.
Dudgeon. D. (2005). River management for conservation of freshwater biodiversity in monsoonal Asia. Ecology and Society 10(2):15.
Duncan. J.R. and Lockwood. J.L. (Nov 2001) Extinction in a field of bullets: a search for causes in the decline of the world’s freshwater fishes: Biological Conservation [Biol. Consev.], vol. 102, no.1, pp. 97-105.
FAO 2012. The State of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
FAO 2014.The state of world fisheries and aquaculture.
Gupta. N., Pandey. P and Hussain. J. (April 2017). Effect of Physicochemical and biological parameters on the quality of river water of Narmada, Madhya Predesh, India. Water Science, vol 31, Issue 1, pages 11-23.
IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee, 2022 Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 15.1. prepared by the Standards and Petitions and Committee.
Jayram, K.C. (1981) The Freshwater Fishes of India. Hand Book, Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta.
Kumar. A and Verma. A.K. (2017). Biodiversity loss and its ecological impact in India. International journal on biological sciences 8 (2): 156-160, July – December, 2017. ISSN No.:0976-4518; NAAS Rating 3.14; UGC approved journal no. 7775.
Margalef. R. (1958). Temporal succession and spatial heterogeneity in phytoplankton. In: Buzzati-Traverso (ed), Perspective in Marine biology, Univ. Calif. Press Berkeley, pp. 323-347.
Molur, S. and Walker. S. (1998). Report of the workshop on Conservation Assessment and Management Plan for Freshwater fishes of India. Zoo outreach Organisation, Conservation Breding Specialist Group, Coimbatore, India. 156p.
National Health and Family Survey, 2019-21.
Parkin. S., Sommer. F. and Uren. S. (2003). Sustainable development: understanding the concept and practical challenge. Proc. Instn Civ. Engineering Sustainability 2003, 156, March, 19-26.
Pieleu. E.C. (1966). The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13: 131-144.
Shannon. C. E. and Winer. W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, University of Illinois Press, pp.177.
Shrestha. T. k. (2008). Ichthyology of Nepal, Himalayan Ecosphere, Kathmandu Nepal.
Shrivastava. PK. (2013). Fish Diversity and Conservation Perspectives of Gandak River, INDIA. Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR), Barrackpore, Kolkata, Our Nation. 11(1): 74-84
Talwar, P.K. and Jhingram A.G. (1991). Inland Fisheries of India and Adjacent Countries, vol.1 &2. Oxford & IBH publishing co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi.
Tilman. D, Isbell. F., Cowles. J.M. and Reich. P.B. (2014). Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2014 45:1, 471-493.
WHO Report 2020-21.
