Study of acid hydrolysis and submerged fermentation parameters in second generation ethanol production using cassava waste

Authors

  • Mariane Daniella da Silva
  • Ágata Silva Cabral
  • João Pedro Cano
  • Crispin Humberto Garcia-Cruz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv10n2-061

Keywords:

lignocellulosic material, cellulosic ethanol, biomass, bioenergy, biofuels, renewable energy

Abstract

Biofuels are an alternative to reduce the environmental impacts caused by the use of petroleum-based fuels. Second generation ethanol comes from lignocellulosic materials that are little used or discarded in the environment, including agro-industrial waste. These residues are rich in sugars that can be converted by ethanol-producing microorganisms. In this context, the present work uses cassava waste (Manihot esculenta Crantz) obtained during the processing of starch as a raw material for the production of cellulosic ethanol, as well as evaluating different parameters in acid hydrolysis and during submerged fermentation using the strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 26602. Experiments of acid hydrolysis of these residues with sulfuric acid in concentrations of 0.5% to 5.0% (v/v) were carried out. The results demonstrated that 2.0% H2SO4 for 10 min. reaction at 121 ºC/1.1 atm in an autoclave reached the highest release of reducing sugars present in the residue (131.09 g.L-1). The ideal conditions for alcoholic fermentation using yeast were pH 6.5, temperature of 35 ºC, without rotation and initial reducing sugar concentration of 50 g.L-1, resulting in 21.23 g.L-1 of ethanol with productivity of 1.86 g.L-¹.h-¹ and theoretical yield of 96.5% after 12 hours of fermentation. The results indicated that the cassava waste serve as a potential substrate for the production of second generation ethanol. Thus, this study provides data on the most suitable conditions for the use of these industrial wastes aiming at the generation of a renewable fuel, an increasingly attractive feature for the world, where the economic and environmental concern is growing.

References

H. A. Ruiz, A. Martínez, W. Vermerris, BioEnerg Res. 2016, 9, 981; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9802-7

A. A. Schmatz, A. M. Salazar-Bryam, J. Contiero, C. Sant'Anna, M. Brienzo, BioEnerg Res. 2021, 14, 106; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10187-8

B. Bharathiraja, J. Jayamuthunagaib, T. Sudharsanaaa, A. Bharghavia, R. Praveenkumarc, M. Chakravarthya, D. Yuvaraj, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 68, 788; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.017

R. Zhu, J. Hu, X. Bao, L. He, Y. Lai, L. Zu, Y. Li, S. Su, Transp. Res. D. 2017, 50, 305; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.027

T. O. Basso, F. S. Gomes, M. L. Lopes, H. V. De Amorim, G. Eggleston, L. C. Basso, Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2014, 105, 169; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-013-0063-6

P. K. Sadh, S. Duhan, J. S. Duhan, Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2018, 5, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-017-0187-z

A. P. Moshi, K. M. M. Hosea, E. Elisante, A. M. Mshandete, I. A. Nges, Br Biotechnol J. 2015, 5, 123; https://doi.org/10.9734/BBJ/2015/13981

M. Zhang, L. Xie, Z. Yin, S. K. Khanal, Q. Zhou, Bioresour. Tech. 2016, 215, 50; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.026

Departament of Rural Economy (DERAL), (2019). Cassava prognosis. Department of Agriculture and Supply. Parana State Government, Brazil.

S. I. Mussatto, I. C. Roberto, Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 24, 94; https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612004000100018

N. Nelson, Biochem. 1944, 153, 375; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)71980-7

M. Somogyi, J. Bio. Chem. 1952, 195, 19; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)50870-5

A. Chaovanalikit, R. Wrolstad, J. Food Scien. 2004, 69, 67;

A. C. Loureiro, J. V. S. Soares, J. S. Chaar, A. F. Hidalgo, L. S. S. Souza, A. M. Pereira, Braz. Ap. Sci. Rev. 2020, 4, 606; https://doi.org/10.34115/basrv4n2-014

E. Tomás-Pejó, P. Alvira, M. Ballesteros, M. J. Negro, Pretreatment Technologies for Lignocellulose-to-Bioethanol Conversion. In: Biofuels: Alternative Feedstocks and Conversion Processes. Elsevier, Madrid, 2011, 149-176.

P. Alvira, E. Tomás-Pejó, M. Ballesteros, M. J. Negro, Bioresour. Tech. 2010, 101, 4851;

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.093

M. D. Silva, V. A. Q. Santos, F. M. P. G. Ernandes, C. H. Garcia-Cruz, Inter. Jour. Dev. Resear. 2020, 10, 38871; https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.19571.08.2020

H. Günan, H. G. Yücel, Z. Aksu, Fuel. 2015, 158, 793; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.016

L. J. Jönsson, C. Martín, Bioresour. Tech. 2016, 199, 103; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.009

B. Lavová, D. Urminská, S. Sillerová, Biotech. Food Scien. 2014, 3, 122;

A. Karapatsia, G. Penloglou, C. Chatzidoukas, C. Kiparissides, Biomass Bioenergy. 2016, 90, 32; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.021

C. Virunanon, C. Ouephanit, V. Burapatana, W. Chulalaksananukul, J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 39, 273; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.055

S.Wang, H. He, J. Yu, S. Chen, X. Li, F. Bo, Q. Guo, Z. Xu, M. Jin, Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 148, 112340; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112304

C. V. T. Mendes, C. H. G. Cruz, D. F. N. Reis, M. G. V. S. Carvalho, J. M. S. Rocha, Bioresour. Tech. 2016, 220, 161; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.140

M. L. Bertuci, M. D. Da Silva, J. P. Cano, C. H. Garcia-Cruz, Brazilian Journal of Development. 2022, 8, 9, 63719-63743; https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv8n9-220

Downloads

Published

2024-02-26

How to Cite

da Silva, M. D., Cabral, Ágata S., Cano, J. P., & Garcia-Cruz, C. H. (2024). Study of acid hydrolysis and submerged fermentation parameters in second generation ethanol production using cassava waste. Brazilian Journal of Development, 10(2), e67548. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv10n2-061

Issue

Section

Original Papers