Growth, yield and economics of fodder grasses at Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh

Authors

  • Anita Tomar
  • Bijay Kumar Singh
  • Swati Priya
  • Sanjay Singh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv10n2-034

Keywords:

Growth, yield, economics, fodder, B:C ratio

Abstract

To study the growth, yield and economics of fodder grasses at Prayagraj in Uttar Pradesh, experiment was established in July 2022 with three treatments and five replications. In this study planted three fodder grasses viz., Pennisetum purpurmum × Pennisetum typhoides (Hybrid napier), Brachiaria mutica (Para grass) and Stylosanthes hamata (Stylo). Results indicated that the maximum height was found in T1: Hybrid Napier 186.60 cm followed by T2: Para grass 132 cm and minimum in T3: Stylo 57 cm. The plant population was maximum found in T3: Stylo 16 followed by T1: Hybrid Napier and T2: Para grass 4 whereas number of tillers or branches per meter square found maximum in T3: Stylo 159.80 followed by T1: Hybrid Napier 158.60 and minimum in T2: Para grass 120. The green fodder yield and dry fodder yield was maximum found in T1: Hybrid Napier 860.16 and 266.65 qha-1 followed by T2: Para grass 438.77 and 122.86 qha-1 and minimum in T3: Stylo 194.65 and 36.98 qha-1 respectively. The maximum net return was found in T1: Hybrid Napier Rs. 75,660 followed by T3: Stylo Rs. 62.505 and minimum in T2: Para grass Rs. 61,605. The maximum B:C ratio was found in T1: Hybrid Napier 2.86 followed by T3: Stylo Rs. 2.61 and minimum in T2: Para grass Rs. 2.29.

References

Ahmad, F. & Malik M. S. (2022). Sustainable Forage Production in Melia azedarach Based Silvopastoral System. For. Res., 11(1) No: 1000307.

Ahmad, F., Malik M. S. & Chattopadhyay S. (2022). Cost-benefit analysis for agroforestry systems in Jharkhand. The Pharma Innovation Journal, SP-11(9): 2198-2202.

Ginwal, D. S., Kumar, R., Ram, H., Dutta, S., Arjun, M. & Hindoriya, P. S. (2019). Fodder productivity and profitability of different maize and legume intercropping systems. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(9), 1451-5.

Kumar, R, Kumar, D, Datt, C, Makarana, G, Yadav, M R & Birbal (2018). Forage yield and nutritional characteristics of cultivated fodders as affected by agronomic interventions: a review. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 35: 373–85.

Misra, M. K. & Misra, B. N. (1981). Seasonal changes in leaf area index and chlorophyll in an Indian grassland. The Journal of Ecology, 797-805pp.

NIANP (2020). ICAR- National Institute of Animanl Nutrition and Physiology (ICAR-NIANP) 2019-20.

Toppo, P., Oraon, R. P., Singh, K. B. & Kumar, A. (2021). Biomass, productivity and carbon sequestration of Tectona grandis and Gmelina arborea-based silvipastoral system, Current Science, 121 (12): 1594 -1599.

Tudsri, S. & Kaewkunya, C. (2002). Effect of leucaena row spacing and cutting intensity on the growth of leucaena and three associated grasses in Thailand. Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences, 15(7), 986-991.

Tudu, K. S., Oraon, R. P., Kumar, A. & Singh, K. B. (2021). Biomass and carbon sequestration potential under silvipastoral system in sub-humid region of India. Range Mgmt. & Agroforestry 42 (2): 341-345.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-19

How to Cite

Tomar, A., Singh, B. K., Priya, S., & Singh, S. (2024). Growth, yield and economics of fodder grasses at Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. Brazilian Journal of Development, 10(2), e67338. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv10n2-034

Issue

Section

Original Papers