Approaches and critiques of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and Normative Accounting Theory (NAT) : a literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv9n12-082Keywords:
positive accounting theory, normative accounting theory, critiqueAbstract
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) is an accounting theory that aims to explain and predict accounting practices carried out by companies. This theory emerged as an alternative to the normative approach which emphasizes more on what accountants should do in presenting financial information. However, PAT also received criticism related to the assumptions used in this theory. Therefore, this paper aims to review how the approach and criticism of PAT. The method used in this research is Systematic Literature Review (SLR) which is conducted by identifying, assessing, and interpreting all available research evidence regarding approaches and criticisms of PAT. The sources used in this paper are articles, books, and journals related to Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and the criticisms raised against it. The results show that PAT has developed into a science that can be used to explain the choice of methods to be used by managers and other constituents of financial statements that can be used for decision making. However, PAT has also been criticized including issues related to research methods, methodology, and the basic assumptions underlying the theory. In conclusion, Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) has had a significant impact on accounting practice, but keep in mind that this theory also has limitations and has been criticized by some parties. This paper provides an in-depth insight into the approaches and criticisms of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT), as well as highlighting the importance of critical evaluation of accounting theory in the development of accounting science as a whole.
References
Arif, B. (1999). Teori akuntansi Dari Pendekatan Normatif ke Positif. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi. Vol. 1 (3), 163-182.
BOLAND, L. A., & GORDON, I. M. (1992). Criticizing positive accounting theory. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9(1), 142–170.
Calderón, A., & Ruiz, M. (2015). A Systematic Literature Review on Serious Games Evaluation: An Application to Software Project Management. Computers & Education, 87, 396-422.
Chariri, A., dan Imam Ghozali. 2007. Teori Akuntansi. Edisi III. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Christenson, C. (1983). The Methodology Of Positive Accounting. The Accounting Review, 58(1), 1–22.
Christie, A. A., (1990). Aggregation Of Test Statistics, An Evaluation Of The Evidence On Contracting And Size Hypotheses, Journal Of Accounting And Economics, Vol. 12.
Deegan, C. (2004). Financial Accounting Theory. Australia: Mcgraw-Hill.
Dwitayanti dan Wijaya (2017) Penggunaan Perspektif Positive Accounting Theory terhadap Konservatisma Akuntansi di Indonesia, Jurnal Riset Terapan Akuntansi, Vol. 1 No. 2
Ekowati, H. W. (2006). Kritik Terhadap Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) Dan Menuju PAT Yang Lebih Bernilai. TEMA, 7 (2).
Fransesco, T., Patty, Q., & Lamawitak, P. L. (2021). Positive And Normative Accounting Theory : Definition And Development. International Journal of Economics, Management, Business and Social Science (IJEMBIS), 1(2), 184–193.
Ghozali, Imam dan Anis Chariri, (2007). Teori Akuntansi, Edisi 3, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Ghozali, Imam, (2000). Paradigma Penelitian Akuntansi, Seminar Dialog Nasional Akuntansi, Semarang, November
Godfrey, J., Allan, H., and Scott, H. (1997). Accounting Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Healy, PM (1985). Pengaruh Skema Bonus Terhadap Keputusan Akuntansi.Akuntansi Jurnal Dan Ekonomi. 85-107.
Holthausen, R. W. & Leftwich, R. W. (1983). The Economic Consequences Of Accounting Choice Implications Of Costly Contracting And Monitoring. Journal Of Accounting And Economics, 5, 77–117. Doi:10.1016/0165-4101(83)90007-1.
Januarti Indira. (2004). Pendekatan Dan Kritik Teori Akuntansi Positif. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing, Volume 01,No 01.
Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior. Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Accounting Economic. 305-360.
Jensen, Michael M, (1976). Reflections on The State of Accounting Research and The Regulation of Accounting, Stanford Lectures in accounting: 1976, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Kitchenham, Barbara dkk. (2009). Systematic Literature Reviews in Sofware engineering – A Systematic Literature Review. Information & Software Technology, 51(1), pp. 7-15.
Lawrence Boland,1992, Critizing Positive Accounting Theory, Journal Of Accounting Research, Vol.9, No. I (Fall), Hal. 142-170.
Mckee, A. James, Timothy B. Bell, Dan James R. Boatsman, (1984). Management Preferences Over Accounting Standards: A Replication And Additional Tests, The Accounting Review, Vol. 59, (4).
Medyastanti Meivida & Subroto Bambang. (2022). Apakah Masih Relevan Teori Akuntansi Positif. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual,Volume 9 ,Nomor 2.
Nasution, S. T. A., Putri, R. F., & Ginting, S. (2020). Positive accounting theory: Theoretical perspectives on accounting policy choice. In Proceedings of the 1st Unimed International Conference on Economics Education and Social Science (UNICEES 2018) (pp. 1128-1133).
Nurmadi, R.; Adiman, S.; and Ginting, S. (2018). Measuring and Valuation of Asset: Accounting Theory Perspective.In Proceedings of the 1st Unimed International Conference on Economics Education and Social Science - Volume 1: UNICEES, p.1208-1212. DOI: 10.5220/0009510912081212.
Setijaningsih Herlin Tundjung. (2012). Teori Akuntansi Positif Dan Konsekuensi Ekonomi. Jurnal Akuntansi, Volume Xvi, No. 03, 427-438.
Sterling, R., “Positive Accounting: An Assessment”, ABACUS (September 1990) Pp. 97- 135.
Tharifah, N.T, Salim, L, (2021). Alternative Analysis of Asset Valuation & Revenue Determination Model: Accounting Theory Perspective. Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation. 32(3). 39752 – 39757. https://turkjphysiotherrehabil.org/pub/pdf/321/32-1-4259.pdf
Tinker, A., B. Merino And M. Neimark, “The Normative Origins Of Positive Theories: Ideology And Accounting Thought”, Accounting, Organizations And Society (May 1982) Pp. 167-200.
Watts, R. L. Dan J. L. Zimmerman, (1986). Positive Accounting Theory, Prentice Hall International Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
Watts, RL, dan Jerold L, Zimmermen (1978). Menuju Teori Akuntansi Positif Akuntansi Standar. Tinjauan Akuntansi. Jil. 53, 112-134.
Watts, RL, dan Jerold L, Zimmermen (1986). Teori Akuntansi Positif. Tebing Englewood. Jersey baru: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Watts, RL, dan Jerold L, Zimmermen (1990). Teori Akuntansi Positif: Perspektif Sepuluh Tahun. Tinjauan Akuntansi. Jil. 65 (1). 131-156.
Whittington, G., “Positive Accounting: A Review Article”, Accounting and Business Research (Autumn 1987) pp. 327-36.
Wiratama, R., & Asri, M. (2020). A Literature Review: Positive Accounting Theory (PAT). SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–10.
Wiwik Hidajah. (2006). Kritik Terhadap Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) Dan Menuju PAT Yang Lebih Bernilai. Tema, Volume 7, Nomor 2.
Zmijewski, M. E. & Hagerman, R. L. (1981). An Income Strategy Approach to the Positive Theory of Accounting Standard Setting/Choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 129–149. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(81)90010-0.
