Produção de etanol da cana-de-açúcar associadas às práticas de ESG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv9n10-068Keywords:
cana-de-açúcar, etanol, ambiental, social, governançaAbstract
O objetivo da pesquisa foi verificar na literatura se a produção da cana-de-açúcar e do etanol está associada às boas práticas Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG). Foram realizadas pesquisas nas bases de dados ScienceDirect e Spell. Os artigos sobre cana-de-açúcar e etanol não mencionarem de forma expressa a relação da produção com ESG mas, o que se pode inferir, é que a relação foi relatada de outra forma como, por exemplo preocupação com os impactos ambientais da cultura, diminuição das emissões de gases de efeito estufa, melhores alternativas no de manejo de fertilizantes etc. As pesquisas sobre as práticas ESG mostraram que os autores focaram mais na relação das empresas com os possíveis investidores e avaliando as práticas, por meio dos índices, como indicadores de boa gestão, por exemplo na prevenção de risco de falência.
References
ALIANO FILHO, A.; MELO, T.; PATO, M. V. A bi-objective mathematical model for integrated planning of sugarcane harvesting and transport operations. Computers & Operations Research, v. 134, 105419, p. 1-19, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2021.105419. ok
ANDRADE JUNIOR, M. A. U. et al. Exploring future scenarios of ethanol demand in Brazil and their land-use implications. Energy Policy, v. 134, p. 1-12, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110958.
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo, 5a ed. Lisboa: Edições 70. Lda, 2009.
BILLIO, M. et al. Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, v. 28, n. 5, p. 1426-1445, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2177. ok
BOFINGER, Y. et al. The sustainability trap: Active fund managers between ESG investing and fund overpricing. Finance Research Letters, v. 45, 102160, p. 1-5, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102160.
BRANCO, J. E. H. et al. Study of optimal locations for new sugarcane mills in Brazil: Application of a MINLP network equilibrium model. Biomass and Bioenergy, v. 127, p. 1-12, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.05.018.
CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Plataforma Sucupira. Brasília: Capes, 2022. Disponível em: <https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/veiculoPublicacaoQualis/listaConsultaGeralPeriodicos.jsf>. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2022.
CASTANEDA-AYARZA; J. A.; GODOI, B. A. Macro-environmental influence on the development of Brazilian fuel ethanol between 1975 and 2019. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 137, 110457, p. 1-11, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110457.
COELHO, S. T. et al. Brazilian sugarcane ethanol: lessons learned. Energy for Sustainable Development, v. 10, n. 2, p. 26-39, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60529-3.
CONAB - COMPANHIA NACIONAL DE ABASTECIMENTO. Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de cana-de-açúcar. Brasília, DF, v. 9, n. 1, abril 2022. Disponível em: <https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/cana>. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2022.
GOLDEMBERG, J.; COELHO, S. T.; GUARDABASSI, P. The sustainability of ethanol production from sugarcane. Energy Policy, v. 36, n. 6, p. 2086-2097, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.028.
GONÇALVES, F. et al. Strategies to improve the environmental efficiency and the profitability of sugarcane mills. Biomass and Bioenergy, v. 148, 106052, p. 1-10, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106052.
LAZARO, L. L. B.; GIATTI, L. L.; OLIVEIRA, J. A. P. Water-energy-food nexus approach at the core of businesses – How businesses in the bioenergy sector in Brazil are responding to integrated challenges? Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 303, 127102, p. 1-11, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127102.
LIMA, N. D. S. et al. Classifying the level of energy-environmental efficiency rating of Brazilian ethanol. Energies, v. 13, n. 8, 2067, p. 1-16, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13082067.
MARTINS, H. C. Competition and ESG practices in emerging markets: Evidence from a difference-in-differences model. Finance Research Letters, v. 46, Part A, 102371, p. 1-9, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102371.
MOREIRA, C. S. et al. Environmental, Social, and Governance e o ciclo de vida das firmas: evidências no mercado de capitais Brasileiro. In USP International Conference in Accouting, 22, Anais..., São Paulo, USP, 2022.
NEVES, M. F.; MARTINEZ, L. F. O modelo GAS-Agro para projetos de desenvolvimento sustentável. Revista Agronomia Brasileira, v. 4, p. 1-10, 2020. https://doi.org/10.29372/rab202032.
OLIVEIRA, D. M. S. et al. Is the expansion of sugarcane over pasturelands a sustainable strategy for Brazil’s bioenergy industry? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 102, p. 346-355, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.012.
PACHECO, R.; SILVA, C. Global warming potential of biomass-to-ethanol: Review and sensitivity analysis through a case study. Energies, v. 12, n. 13, 2535, p. 1-18, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12132535.
SANCHES, G. M. et al. Agronomic, economic, and environmental assessment of site-specific fertilizer management of Brazilian sugarcane fields. Geoderma Regional, v. 24, e00360, p. 1-11, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2021.e00360.
SANTOS, M. R. et al. O etanol da cana-de-açúcar e os objetivos de desenvolvimento sustentável. In: ENCONTRO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE GESTÃO EMPRESARIAL E MEIO AMBIENTE, 22., 2020, São Paulo. Anais... São Paulo: Engema, 2020.
SANTOS, M. C.; PEREIRA, F. H. ESG performance scoring method to support responsible investments in port operations. Case Studies on Transport Policy, v. 10, n. 1, p. 664-673, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.01.027
SCHEITERLE, L., et al. From commodity-based value chains to biomass-based value webs: The case of sugarcane in Brazil’s bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 172, p. 3851-3863, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.150.
SHARMA, B.; LARROCHE, C.; DUSSAP, C-G. Comprehensive assessment of 2G bioethanol production. Bioresource Technology, v. 313, 123630, p. 1-9, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123630.
SILVA, P. P. Crash risk and ESG disclosure. Borsa Istanbul Review, v. 22, n. 4, p. 794-811, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.04.001.
SOUSA, L. C. et al. Innovation systems of ethanol in Brazil and the United States: making a new fuel competitive. In Salles-Filho, S. L. M.; Cortez; L. A. B.; Silveira, J. M. F. J.; Trindade, S. C.; Fonseca, M. G. D. (Eds). Global Bioethanol Evolution, Risks, and Uncertainties, p. 93-121. Chennai, Índia: Elsevier, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803141-4.00004-6.
SOUZA, N. R. D. et al. Sugarcane ethanol and beef cattle integration in Brazil. Biomass and Bioenergy, v. 120, p. 448-457, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.12.012.
SOUZA, N. R. D. et al. Unraveling the potential of sugarcane electricity for climate change mitigation in Brazil. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 175, 105878, p. 1-12, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105878.
ONU - ORGANIZAÇÕES DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS. The Global Compact: Who Cares Wins. Swiss: ONU, 2004. Disponível em: <https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/280911488968799581/pdf/113237-WP-WhoCaresWins-2004.pdf >. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.
VANDENBERGHE, L. P. S. et al. Beyond sugar and ethanol: The future of sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 167, 112721, p. 1-18, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112721.
WHITELOCK, V. G. Environmental social governance management: a theoretical perspective for the role of disclosure in the supply chain. International Journal of Business Information Systems, v. 18, n. 4, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2015.068477.
YU, E. P.; LUU, B. V. International variations in ESG disclosure – Do cross-listed companies care more? International Review of Financial Analysis, v. 75, 101731, p. 1-14, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101731.
