Focus group evaluation of an elective course design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv9n4-004Keywords:
teacher training, focus group, curriculum designAbstract
This research led to determining the relevance of the curriculum designed by our Professional Training School for Teachers in Puebla, Mexico, regarding the dimensions of content and curricular order, based on the experience of students and teachers. The methodology has a qualitative approach; the technique was focus groups, and the instrument was a script of open questions that considered the internal evaluation of the process. It is in our best interest to strengthen the design and implementation of the "Inclusion, Art, Play, and Sport" course as part of a series of community-proposed optional courses. In the experience of students and teachers, the group met the general purpose. The feedback received through the focus groups cut in greater depth for students to identify the collective achievements of all the participants: students, teachers, and curriculum designers. Throughout the study, we identified aspects for improvement, such as rethinking some activities and learning evidence, reducing the amount of information to meet, and establishing a better relationship between the topics and the teaching practices, particularly those related to strategies for inclusion in art and sports.
References
Coll, C. (1990). Psicología y currículum, Una aproximación psicopedagógica a la elaboración del currículum escolar. México: Paidós.
Cruz Cardona V. (1996) Evaluación y acreditación de programas de postgrado. Madrid: Asociación Universidad Iberoamericana de Postgrado.
Diario Oficial de la Federación (2018) Acuerdo número 14/07/18 por el que se establecen los planes y programas de estudio de las licenciaturas para la formación de maestros de educación básica que se indican. https://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5533910&fecha=03/08/2018
Díaz Barriga, A. (2003) El currículo. Tensiones conceptuales y prácticas. En REDIE, Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa. 5 (2). https://redie.uabc.mx/redie/article/view/83/1216
Fabra, María Luisa., Miguel Domenech, Hablar y escuchar. Paidós, 2001.
Krueger, R. (1998). Analyzing and reporting focus group results. California: Sage.
Larraguivel, E. R. (1998). Propuesta de un modelo de evaluación curricular para el nivel superior: una orientación cualitativa. México: UNAM.
Osorio, M., García, G. y Sánchez, J. (2021) Propuesta de instrumentos para evaluación curricular de programas de Psicología. En Revista de Educación y Desarrollo, 57. Abril-junio de 2021. https://www.cucs.udg.mx/revistas/edu_desarrollo/anteriores/57/57_Osorio.pdf
Rangel, H. (2015) Una mirada internacional de la construcción curricular. Por un currículo vivo, democrático y deliberativo. En Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa. 17 (1). Recuperado de https://redie.uabc.mx/redie/article/view/380/992
Salas Perea, R. (2016). Is curriculum redesigning without previous curricular assessment scientific? Educación Médica Superior, 30 (2) http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21412016000200017&lng=es&tlng=en
Stake, R., E. (1998). Investigación con estudio de casos. Ediciones Morata.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The Relevance of the CIPP Evaluation Model for Educational Accountability. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 5, 19-25.
Walter, D. (1982) Curriculum theory is many things to many people. Theory into Practice. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1476713

