Competitividade e Produtividade numa abordagem sistémica aplicada à Academia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv9n3-096Keywords:
capital humano, concorrência, educação/formação, produtividade, qualidade da investigaçãoAbstract
Este estudo, baseado na colaboração universidade-indústria, visa contribuir para o reforço do Sistema Nacional de Investigação e Inovação. Considerando como fatores críticos o Capital Humano e a Qualidade da Investigação, explora ainda os fatores de equilíbrio e reforço que não só superam os constrangimentos de educação/formação entre a universidade e a indústria, mas também são úteis para aumentar a competitividade das empresas e melhorar a sua produtividade. O modelo de reforço desenvolvido destaca os resultados que surgem depois de melhorar a educação/formação e a qualidade da investigação, revelando o impacto destes fatores cruciais para o crescimento económico e para o aumento da competitividade e produtividade das empresas, complementado pela melhoria na qualidade de vida e na construção/fortalecimento de uma sociedade mais desenvolvida e próspera.
References
Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Licht, G. (2017). National systems of innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 997-1008.
Afzal, M., Lawrey, R., & Gope, J. (2019). Understanding national innovation system (NIS) using porter’s diamond model (PDM) of competitiveness in ASEAN-05. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 29(4), 336-355.
Ahmed, E. (2012). Are the FDI inflow spillover effects on Malaysia's economic growth input driven? Economic Modeling, 29(4): 1498-1504.
Arbonies, A. & Moso, M. (2002). Basque Country: the knowledge cluster, Journal of Knowledge Management 6(4): 347-355.
Autant-Bernard C., Fadairo M, & Massard N. (2013). Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence. Research Policy, 42(1): 196-210.
Awuzie, B., Ngowi, A. B., Omotayo, T., Obi, L., & Akotia, J. (2021). Facilitating successful smart campus transitions: A systems thinking-SWOT analysis approach. Applied Sciences, 11(5), 2044.
Bhawsar, P., & Chattopadhyay, U. (2015). Competitiveness: Review, reflections and directions. Global Business Review, 16(4), 665-679.
Baghernejad, J. (2006). Cultivating technological innovations in Middle Eastern countries: Factors affecting firm‘s technological innovation behaviour in Iran‖, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 13 (4): 361-380.
Bakan, I., & Doğan, İ. F. (2012). Competitiveness of the industries based on the Porter’s diamond model: An empirical study. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences, 11(3), 441-455.
Becker, G. (1993). The economic way of looking at behavior. J Polit Econ, 101(3): 385–409.
Beerkens M. & Udam, M. (2017). Stakeholders in Higher Education Quality Assurance: Richness in Diversity? September 2017.Higher Education Policy. 30(3): 341-359.
Benneworth, P. (2019). Universities and regional economic development. Routledge.
Benneworth, P. (2015). "Universities’ contributions to social innovation: reflections in theory & practice", European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(4): 508-527.
Benneworth, P., Cunha, J., & Cinar, R. (2020). Between good intentions and enthusiastic professors: the missing middle of university social innovation structures in the Quadruple Helix. Regional Helix Ecosystems and Sustainable Growth: The Interaction of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer, 31-44.
Bircan, I., & Gencler, F. (2015). Analysis of innovation-based human resources for sustainable development. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 195, 1348-1354.
Blair, M. M. (2011). An economic perspective on the notion of ‘human capital’.
Bleaney, M., Binks, M., Greenaway, D., Reed, G. & Whynes, D. (1992). Applied Economics, 24, 305-311.
Bonaccorsi, A. & Piccaluga, A. (1994). A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships. R&D Management, 24(3): 229-247.
Bramwell, A., & Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research policy, 37(8), 1175-1187.
Breznitz, S. M. (2014). The fountain of knowledge: The role of universities in economic development. Stanford University Press.
Brundenius, C., Lundvall, B. Å., & Sutz, J. (2009). The role of universities in innovation systems in developing countries: developmental university systems–empirical, analytical and normative perspectives. In Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Cai, Y. (2014). Implementing the Triple Helix model in a non-Western context: an institutional logics perspective. Triple Helix, 1(1), 1-20.
Cai, Y., & Etzkowitz, H. (2020). Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future. Triple Helix, 7(2-3), 189-226.
Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D. & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1): 1–12.
Castellani, D., Piva, M., Schubert, T., & Vivarelli, M. (2019). R&D and productivity in the US and the EU: Sectoral specificities and differences in the crisis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 279-291.
Checkland, P. (1999). System Thinking, System Practice. Chichester, England.: John Wiley and Sons.
Chen, M. K., Wu, S. W., Huang, Y. P., & Chang, F. J. (2022). The Key Success Factors for the Operation of SME Cluster Business Ecosystem. Sustainability, 14(14), 8236.
Dasgupta, A. (2017). Finding the right fit in academia and industry collaboration. Geospatial World. Juin, 2017.
de Sousa, F. S., Zucco, A., Santos, E. D. S. M., Machado, J. C., & dos Santos Souza, S. R. S. (2022). Trajetória da responsabilidade social e corporativa das empresas listadas no ISE: uma década de sustentabilidade rumo à longevidade empresarial: Trajectory of social responsibility and corporate firms listed in ISE: a decade of sustainability towards the longevity business. Brazilian Journal of Business, 4(3), 1355-1375.
Deming, D. J. (2022). Four facts about human capital. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 36(3), 75-102.
Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(23), 5964-5969.
Dieguez, T. (2020). The Role of Porto University in the Development of Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Journal of Business and Economics, ISSN, 2155-7950.
Dieguez, T. (2018). Sustainable Development: a controversial concept. International Journal of Modern Research in Engineering & Management, 1(1/7): 15-2.
Echevarría, J. (2008). El manual de Oslo y la innovación social. Arbor, 184(732), 609-618.
Edquist, C. (ed.) (1997). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London: Pinter/Cassell.
Eid, A. (2012). Higher education R&D and productivity growth: an empirical study on high-incomeOECD countries. Education Economics, 20(1): 53–68.
Etzkowitz, H. (2017). Innovation Lodestar: The entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 122-129.
Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. Routledge, London.
Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 20(2): 18-29.
Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). The triple helix: University–industry–government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.
Elmassah, S., Biltagy, M., & Gamal, D. (2022). Framing the role of higher education in sustainable development: a case study analysis. International journal of sustainability in higher education, 23(2), 320-355.
Fang, K., Zhou, Y., Wang, S., Ye, R., & Guo, S. (2018). Assessing national renewable energy competitiveness of the G20: A revised Porter's Diamond Model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 93, 719-731.
Faulkner, W. & Senker, J. (1995). Knowledge frontiers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
FCT (2013), Diagnóstico do Sistema de Investigação e Inovação: Desafios, forças e fraquezas rumo a 2018. Lisboa: FCT.
Fischer, B., Guerrero, M., Guimón, J., & Schaeffer, P. R. (2021). Knowledge transfer for frugal innovation: where do entrepreneurial universities stand?. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(2), 360-379.
Fishburn, P. C. (2015). The theory of social choice. Princeton University Press.
Foss, L., & Gibson, D. V. (2015). The entrepreneurial university: Context and institutional change. In The Entrepreneurial University (pp. 1-17). Routledge.
Galanakis, K. (2006). Innovation process. Make sense using systems thinking. Technovation, 26(11), 1222-1232.
Garcia-Montijo, L., & Perez-Soltero, A. (2018). Academy–industry linking capabilities as a determinant of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 10(2), 220-237.
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm?. Journal of cleaner production, 143, 757-768.
Germain-Alamartine, E., & Moghadam-Saman, S. (2020). Aligning doctoral education with local industrial employers’ needs: a comparative case study. European Planning Studies, 28(2), 234-254.
Gharajedaghi, J. (1999). Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity : a Platform for Designing Business Architecture. Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann.
Gibb, A., Haskins, G, & Robertson, I. (2009). Leading the Entrepreneurial University. The paper published in cooperation with NCGE & Oxford University’s Said Business School.
Groundstroem, F., & Juhola, S. (2021). Using systems thinking and causal loop diagrams to identify cascading climate change impacts on bioenergy supply systems. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 26(7), 29.
Günther, J., & Meissner, D. (2017). Clusters as innovative melting pots?—The meaning of cluster management for knowledge diffusion in clusters. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8, 499-512.
Haraldsson, H. V. (2004). Introduction to system thinking and causal loop diagrams (pp. 3-4). Lund, Sweden: Department of chemical engineering, Lund University.
Harding, A., Laske, S., & Scott, A. (2016). Bright satanic mills: Universities, regional development and the knowledge economy. Routledge.
Hernández-Trasobares, A., & Murillo-Luna, J. L. (2020). The effect of triple helix cooperation on business innovation: The case of Spain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120296.
Hervás-Oliver, J. L., Parrilli, M. D., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Sempere-Ripoll, F. (2021). The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU. Research Policy, 50(9), 104316.
Hindess, B. (2014). Choice, rationality, and social theory. Routledge.
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2013). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge.
Hull F, & Hage J (1982). Organization for Innovation: Beyond Burns and Stalker’s Organic Type, Sociology 16: 564-577.
Jin, B., & Moon, H. C. (2006). The diamond approach to the competitiveness of Korea's apparel industry: Michael Porter and beyond. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 10(2), 195-208.
Kaats, E., & Opheij, W. (2014). Creating conditions for promising collaboration: Alliances, networks, chains, strategic partnerships. Berlin: Springer.
Karaev, A.; Lenny Koh, S.C. & Szamosi (2007). The cluster approach and SME competitiveness: a review, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 1 (18:7).
Kashani, E. S., & Roshani, S. (2019). Evolution of innovation system literature: Intellectual bases and emerging trends. Technological forecasting and social change, 146, 68-80.
Kim, D., & Lee, C. Y. (2022). R&D employee training, the stock of technological knowledge, and R&D productivity. R&D Management, 52(5), 801-819.
Kliewe, T. (2015). Value creation in University-industry relationships: a view on stakeholder and relationship value from the perspective of academics in England. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Coventry: Coventry University in cooperation with Münster University of Applied Sciences.
Kotsemir, M. (2013). Measuring national innovation systems efficiency–a review of DEA approach. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP, 16.
Kimatu, J. N. (2016). Evolution of strategic interactions from the triple to quad helix innovation models for sustainable development in the era of globalization. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 1-7.
Kuah, A. T. (2002). Cluster theory and practice: Advantages for the small business locating in a vibrant cluster. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 206-228.
Labanauskis, R. & Ginevičius, R. (2017). Role of stakeholders leading to development of higher education services. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 9(3): 63-75.
Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Alexandria: VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Lanciano-morandat, C., & Nohara, H. (2002). The new production of young scientists (PhDs): a labour market analysis in international perspective (No. 03-04). DRUID Working Paper.
Lester, R. (2005). Universities, innovation, and the competitiveness of local economies. A summary report from the local innovation systems project: Phase I. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Industrial Performance Center, working paper series.
Leydesdorff, L (2012), The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lundvall, B. (ed.) (1992), National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London, Pinter Publishers.
Mascarenhas, C., Ferreira, J. J., & Marques, C. (2018). University–industry cooperation: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Science and Public Policy, 45(5), 708-718.
Muhamad, S., Sulaiman, N. F. C., & Saputra, J. (2018). The role of human capital and innovation capacity on economic growth in ASEAN-3. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 52(1), 281-294.
Mulà, I., Tilbury, D., Ryan, A., Mader, M., Dlouhá, J., Mader, C., ... & Alba, D. (2017). Catalysing change in higher education for sustainable development: A review of professional development initiatives for university educators. International journal of sustainability in higher education.
Natário, M., Couto, J., Tiago, T. & Braga, A. (2007). Determinantes da Capacidade Nacional De Inovação: Uma Análise à Realidade Europeia‖. Em Proceedings XVII Jornadas Hispano-Lusas de Gestão, Logroño, Espanha, 8 e 9 de Fevereiro, 2007. Ayala Calvo, J.C. y grupo de investigación FEDRA, Universidade de la Rioja, pp. 1650-1662.
Nelson, R.(ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2016). Not for profit. In Not for Profit. Princeton university press.
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press.
Porter, M. E. 1998. The Competitive Advantage of Nations (with a new foreword), New York: The Free Press.
Sachini, E., Karampekios, N., & Chrysomallidis, C. (2020). Introducing human capital in greek higher education institutes in the postcrisis Era. The case of the “Acquisition of academic teaching experience for new scientists” public initiative. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(4), 1630-1645.
Schartinger, D.; Rammer, C.; Fisher, M. & Fröhlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universtities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31(3): 303-328, March 2002.
Schultz, T.W. (1993). The economic importance of human capital in modernization. Education Economics, 1(1): 13-19.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1976). II. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 1942.
Shepherd, D. A. & Patzelt, H. (2011). The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: studying entrepreneurial action linking “what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1): 137-163.
Siliverstovs, B. (2016). R&D and non-linear productivity growth. Research policy, 45(3), 634-646.
Simóes, A. (2013). O e-Planning como Instrumento na Construção do Cluster do Mar em Portugal - Quantificação, Participação e Envolvimento dos Setores Socioeconómicos Nacionais. Tese de Doutoramento em e-Planeamento. FCSH. Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
Şipoş, G. L., Bizoi, G., & Ionescu, A. (2014). The Impact of Hampering Innovation Factors on Innovation Performance–European Countries Case. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 415-424.
Sivam, A., Dieguez, T., Ferreira, L. P., & Silva, F. J. (2019). Key settings for successful open innovation arena. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 6(4), 507-515.
Skute, I., Zalewska-Kurek, K., Hatak, I., & de Weerd-Nederhof, P. (2019). Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the literature on university–industry collaborations. The journal of technology transfer, 44, 916-947.
Smith, C. (1999). Market Women: Learning strategies of successful Black women entrepreneurs in New York State. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
To, C. K. (2016). Collaboration modes, preconditions, and contingencies in organizational alliance: A comparative assessment. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4737-4743.
Urbano, D., Toledano, N., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2011). Sociocultural factors and transnational entrepreneurship. A multiple case study in Spain. International Small Business Journal, 29(2): 119-134.
Yokakul, N. & Zawdie, G. (2009). The Role of Triple Helix for Promoting Social Capital, Industrial Technology and Innovation in the SME Sector in Thailand. Science Technology Society, 14(1): 93-117.
Yusuf, S., & Nabeshima, K. (Eds.). (2007). How universities promote economic growth. World Bank Publications.
Wignaraja, G. (2003). Competitiveness analysis and strategy, in Wignaraja G. (Ed.), Competitiveness Strategy in Developing Countries, Routledge, New York.
Zavargo, Z. & Šumid, Z. (2011). Cooperation between educational institutions and businesses. 1st International Conference on Entrepreneurial Learning. University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technology, Novi Sad, Serbia. Zagreb, 2 June, 2011.
Zhang, F., & Zhu, L. (2019). Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1012-1026.
