Histomorphological and histomorphometric analysis of wollastonite and tricalcium phosphate composite at different concentrations after in vivo implantation

Authors

  • Luisa Queiroz Vasconcelos
  • Mauricio Mitsuo Monção
  • Aryon de Almeida Barbosa Júnior
  • Raúl Garcia Carrodeguas
  • Isabela Cerqueira Barreto
  • Roberto Paulo Correia de Araújo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv9n1-363

Keywords:

biocompatible materials, calcium silicate, calcium phosphate, bone regeneration

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate, through histomorphometric analysis in critical bone defect, the osteogenic behavior of new glass-ceramic biomaterials in granules, named different from pseudowollastonite (p-W) and beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP). Methods: Forty Wistar rats were randomly distributed into 4 groups, with 5 animals in each group recovered at 15 and 45 days: G20/80 (20% p-wollastonite and 80% β-tricalcium phosphate); G60/40 (60% p-W and 40% β-TCP); G80/20 (80% p-W and 20% β-TCP); and CG (control group). Results: A histomorphological analysis showed that, in all rules, the composites were biocompatible and bioactive. The G60/40 presents osteoid matrix deposition in 65% of the bone defect at 45 days. While the other groups formed similar percentages of bone neoformation in both biological points. Conclusion: The studied composites are biocompatible, fillers and osteoconductive.

References

Guastaldi AC, Aparecida AH. Fosfato de cálcio de interesse biológico: importância como biomateriais, propriedades e métodos de obtenção de recobrimento. Quim Nova, 2010;33(6):1352-13528.

Miguel FB, Cardoso AKMV, Barbosa Junior AA, Elcio Marcantonio Junior E, Goissis G, Rosa FP. Morphological assessment of the behavior of three dimension alanionic collagen matrices in bone regeneration in rats. J BiomedMater Res. 2006;78(2):334-339. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30492

Carrodeguas RG, De Aza PN, De Aza. Main contributions to bioceramics. Boletin de la Sociedad Espanola de Ceramica y Vidrio. 2011;50(6):301-309. https://doi.org/10.3989/cyv.292011

Tedeja A, Piña C, Martínez S, Avila G. Cerámicas bioeutecticas W-TCP. Revista Mexicana de Física. 2004;50(2):187-192.

Barbosa WT, De Almeida KV, De Lima GG, Rodriguez MA, Lia Fook MV, Carrodeguas RG, et al. Synthesis and in vivo evaluation of a scaffold containing wollastonite/β-TCP for bone repair in a rabbit tibial defect model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019;8:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34462.

Artas G, Gul M, Acikan I, Kirtay M, Bozoglan A, Simsek S, et al. A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration. Braz. oral res. 2019;13:32-59. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0059.

Gaspar AMM, Saska S, Carrodeguas RG, De Aza AH, Péna P, De Aza PN, et al. Biological response to wollastonite doped α-tricalcium phosphate implants in hard and soft tissues in rats. Key Engineering Materials. 2009;396:7-10. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.396-398.7

Furusawa T, Mizunuma K, Yamashita S, Takahashi T. Investigation of early bone formation using resorbable bioactive glass in the rat mandible. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13(5):672-676.

Coathup MJ, Hing KA, Samizadeh S, Chan O, Fang YS, Campion C, et al. Effect of increased strut porosity of calcium phosphate boné graft substitute biomaterials on osteoinduction. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2012;100A(6):1550-1555. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34094.

Fetner AE, Hartigan M, Low SB. Periodontal repair using Perioglass in nonhuman primates: clinical and histologic observations. Compend Cont Educ Dent. 1994;5:932-938.

Grégoire M, Orly I, Menanteau, J. The influence of calcium phosphate biomaterials on human bone cell activities. An in vitro approach. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1990;24(2):165-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820240204

Almeida RS. Avaliação da implantação de grânulos de ²-TCP associado ou não à biovidro fosfatado para regeneração de defeito ósseo [dissertação]. Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 2013.

Pérez RA, Won J-E, Knowles JC, Kim HW. Naturally and synthetic smart composite biomaterials for tissue regeneration. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2013;65(4):471–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.03.009

Santos GG, Vasconcelos LQ, Poy SCS, Almeida RdosS, Barbosa Júnior AA, Santos SRdeA, et al. Influence of the geometry of nanostructure dhydroxyapatiteand alginate composites in the initial phase of bone repair. Acta Cir. Bras. 2019;34(2):201900203. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8650201900203

Alimi M, Navarro-Ramirez R, Parikh K, Njoku I, Hofstetter CP, Tsiouris AJ, et al. Radiographic and clinical outcome of silicate-substituted calcium phosphate (Si-CaP) Ceramic bone graft in spinal fusion procedures. Clinical Spine Surgery. 2017;30(6): E845-E52. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000432

Ge R., Xun C., Yang J., Jia W., Li, Y. Efeito terapêutico in vivo da wollastonita e hidroxiapatita no defeito ósseo. Materiais Biomédicos. 2019;14(6):065013. https://doi.org/10.1088 /1748-605x/ab

Downloads

Published

2023-01-26

How to Cite

Vasconcelos, L. Q., Monção, M. M., Barbosa Júnior, A. de A., Carrodeguas, R. G., Barreto, I. C., & de Araújo, R. P. C. (2023). Histomorphological and histomorphometric analysis of wollastonite and tricalcium phosphate composite at different concentrations after in vivo implantation. Brazilian Journal of Development, 9(1), 5324–5338. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv9n1-363

Issue

Section

Original Papers