Relationship between the main economic, environmental and social impacts of hydroelectric dams

Determinação das relações entre os principais impactos econômicos, ambientais e sociais das usinas hidrelétricas

Authors

  • Jose Andres Gomez Romero
  • Martin Gerardo Martínez Rangel
  • Jose Alberto Hernández Aguilar
  • Adriana Valencia Valencia
  • José Carlos Alberto Ortíz Acle
  • Leonardo de Jesús Ramos Gutiérrez
  • Hugo Armando Fragoso Cano

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv8n10-100

Keywords:

dams, barrages & reservoirs, environment, hydrology & water resource, management, social impact, sustainability

Abstract

Hydroelectric power plants have been a growth tool to supply communities with water resources and electricity. In the last seven decades, large dams increased their environmental and social impacts, which caused the fragmentation and transformation of rivers. It is estimated that around 80 million people are displaced by its construction and operation; and its greatest impact comes from reservoirs by flooding large tracts of land permanently.  In this sense, this study seeks to determine the relationship between the main economic, environmental and social impacts of the construction of hydroelectric power plants.It addresses the different non-participatory methods, such as secondary data, documents, records and databases were reviewed.  From this information, principal component analysis, simple regression, correlations, multivariate and 3D dispersion graphs were performed. Once the different methods were applied, a significant correlation was identified between the variables of installed capacity and number of displaced people. The study concludes that natural resources are a source of attraction for people to settle around them, the water resource is of special interest, therefore, it is not strange that when establishing a hydroelectric project, there is invariably displacement of people in order to benefit a greater number of them through the generation of energy, prevent floods and droughts among other benefits, depending on the category that the dam have, as there are single purpose and multiple purpose.  It is undeniable that there is a very strong correlation between the construction of dams and the economic development of a region, however, the correlation that exists between the construction of dams and the displacement of people is also undeniable, hence the importance of this study that is presented, since it allows having clearer economic, environmental and social perspectives that allow identify whether large hydroelectric project construction projects succeed or fail in their purpose of sustainable regional development.The results indicate that by increasing the installed capacity, there is a social impact as it will increase the displacement of people due to the construction or operation of hydroelectric power plants.

References

Acosta, C. (2004). Effect of transnational corporations on indigenous communities: Endesa and the Mapuche-Pehuenche community (Bachelor's degree in international relations). University of the Americas.

Afgan, N., & Carvalho, M. (2002). “Multi-criteria assessment of new and renewable energy power plants”. Energy, 27(8), pp.739-755.

Barriga, V. & Pinto, S. (2019). Even hunting has no reason, because with the hydroelectric all animals are gone”: UHE historic, conflicts and socio-environmental impacts in Ferreira Gomes / A mesma caça não tem nenhuma razão, pois com a hidrelétrica todos os animais são utilizados ”: UHE histórico, conflitos e impactos socioambientais em Ferreira Gomes. Brazilian Journal of Development, 5(7), 9198–9210.

Beccali, M., Cellura, M., & Mistretta, M. (2003). “Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology”. Renewable energy, 28(13), pp. 2063-2087.

Chatzimouratidis, A. & Pilavachi, P. (2008). “Multicriteria evaluation of power plants impact on the living standard using the analytic hierarchy process”. Energy policy, 36(3), pp. 1074-1089.

Clar, A. (2013). "Megarepresas and their environmental impacts". Ecoportal, 12 April 2013. Available in http://www.ecoportal.net/Temas_Especiales/Energias/Megarepresas_y_sus_impactos_ambientales [Consulted 23-.3-2021]

Gleick, Peter H. (1998). The World's Water 1998-1999: The Biennial Report On Freshwater Resources. Washington: Island Press.

Griffith, A. (2010). SPSS for dummies, 2nd edition. New Jersey, Wiley Publishing, Inc.

Hernández, Fernández, C. & Baptista, P. (2010). Research Methodology. Mexico: Mc Graw-Hill.

ICOLD (2020a). “World Register of Dams: The History of the World Register of Dams”. Disponible en: https://www.icold-cigb.org/GB/world_register/history.asp [Consultado 25-06-2021].

ICOLD (2020b). “World Register of Dams: General Synthesis”. Disponible en: http://www.icold-cigb.org/article/GB/world_register/general_synthesis/general-synthesis [Consultado 25-06-2021].

ICOLD (2020c). “World Register of Dams: Classification By Resettled Persons”. Disponible en: http://www.icold-cigb.org/article/GB/world_register/general_synthesis/classification-by-resettled-persons [Consultado 25-06-2021].

Lemón, V. G., Pereira, G., de Holanda, M. J., Gomes, A. T., Monteiro, A. C., de Almeida, A. C., Henrique, D. L., dos Santos, J. S., Alves, V. C. & Mota, R. (2019). Socio-environmental impacts caused by hydroelectric dams in northeastern Brazil / Impactos socioambientais causados por barragens hidrelétricas no nordeste do Brasil. Brazilian Journal of Development, 5(11), 22846–22853.

McCully, P. (2004). Silenced rivers: ecology and politics of large dams. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Proteger.

Mendez, E. (1997). Renewable Energies: A green public approach. Madrid: Los libros de Catarata.

Ottinger, R., Wooley, D., Robinson, N., Hodas, D., Babb, S., Buchanan, S. & Fritsche, U. (1991). Environmental costs of electricity. New York: Oceana Publications.

Pimentel, D., Rodrigues, G., Wang, T., Abrams, R., Goldberg, K., Staecker, H., & Boerke, S. (1994). “Renewable energy: economic and environmental issues”. BioScience, 44(8), pp. 536-547.

Ritchey, F.J. (2008). Statistics for the Social Sciences, second edition. Mexico, D.F. Mc-Graw-HillInteramerican.

San Martin, R. (1989). Environmental emissions from energy technology systems: The total fuel cycle. Deputy Assistant Secretary for Renewable Energy, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC.

Suárez, R. & Peirano, M. (2010). Socio-environmental impacts of mega dams: The Garabi case. Available inhttp://www.mbigua.org.ar/uploads/RepresaGarabi2010.pdf [Consulted 2021-06-21].

Troldborg, M., Heslop, S., & Hough, R. L. (2014). “Assessing the sustainability of renewable energy technologies using multi-criteria analysis: Suitability of approach for national-scale assessments and associated uncertainties”. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 39, pp. 1173-1184.

Walker, G. (1995). Energy, land use and renewables: a changing agenda. Land Use Policy, 12(1), 3-6.

Wang, J., Jing, Y., Zhang, C. & Zhao, J. (2009). “Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making”. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 13(9), pp. 2263-2278.

World Commission On Dams (2000). Dams and development: A new framework for decision-making: The report of the World Commission On Dams. Earthscan: WCD.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-07

How to Cite

Romero, J. A. G., Rangel, M. G. M., Aguilar, J. A. H., Valencia, A. V., Acle, J. C. A. O., Gutiérrez , L. de J. R., & Cano, H. A. F. (2022). Relationship between the main economic, environmental and social impacts of hydroelectric dams: Determinação das relações entre os principais impactos econômicos, ambientais e sociais das usinas hidrelétricas. Brazilian Journal of Development, 8(10), 66322–66345. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv8n10-100

Issue

Section

Original Papers