Evaluation of the production of second generation Ethanol by co-culture of saccharomyces cerevisiae and pachysolen tannophilus immobilized in Sodium alginate

Avaliação da produção de Etanol de segunda geração por co-cultura de saccharomyces cerevisiae e pachysolen tannophilus imobilizados em alginato de Sódio

Authors

  • Marcello Lima Bertuci
  • Mariane Daniella da Silva
  • João Pedro Cano
  • Crispin Humberto Garcia Cruz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv8n9-220

Keywords:

agroindustrial waste, Bioethanol, consortium, rice husk, acid Hydrolysis

Abstract

The production of an alternative form of fuel that replaces fossil fuels has been increasingly studied due to the environmental impacts generated by its excessive use, as well as the depletion of these fossil energy sources. Ethanol obtained from the crushing of sugar cane has been used as a substitute for these fuels, mainly in the automotive area. However, alternative sources are being studied to produce the so called second generation bioethanol. This would avoid competition for food producing agricultural areas and agroindustrial waste is a great source for obtaining it. In general, these residues are not always completely reused and are disposed of inappropriately in the environment, becoming contaminants. Therefore, the use of agroindustrial waste can become a renewable source of energy, in addition to reducing environmental impacts. The objective of this work is to produce second generation bioethanol as an alternative to the one currently used, using the rice husk hydrolyzate by the consortium formed by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pachysolen tannophilus. For this, an acid hydrolysis was performed with 2% sulfuric acid during 10 minutes of heating in an autoclave, after which the hydrolyzate was detoxified with the use of activated carbon. The crude and detoxified hydrolysates were used as a substrate for the fermentation medium with an initial concentration of 50 mg/mL of reducing sugars. The fermentation process with the use of both yeasts in the crude hydrolyzate medium, in the detoxified medium and in a synthetic medium composed of glucose, was carried out for 24 h, 30º C, 0 rpm and pH 6.5. The best results for the ethanol production of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was the synthetic medium with 20.6 mg/mL. For the yeast Pachysolen tannophilus, its highest production was in a synthetic medium with 11.67 mg/mL. The intercropping of the two yeasts proved to be efficient with a greater ethanol production reaching 21.5 mg/mL, the hydrolyzed and detoxified media showed great potential for ethanol production both in intercropping and in monoculture.

References

Dafnomilis I, Hoefnagels R, Pratama Y W, Schott D L, Lodewijks G, Junginger M (2017) Review of solid and liquid biofuel demand and supply in Northwest Europe towards 2030 – a comparison of national and regional projections. Renewable Sustainable Energy Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.108

Küüt A, Ilves R, Küüt K, Raide V, Ritslaid K J (2017) Influence of European Union Directives on the use of liquid biofuel in the transport sector. Procedia Engineering 187: 30– 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.346

Wei P, Cheng L-H, Zhang L, Xu X-H, Chen H-L, Gao C-J (2014) A review of membrane technology for bioethanol production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 30: 388-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.017

Maldhure A V, Ehle J D (2013) Pyrolysis of purified kraft lignin in the presence of AlCl3 and ZnCl2. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 1: 844-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.07.026

Furtado A T, Hekkert M P, Negro S O (2020) Of actors, functions, and fuels: Exploring a second generation ethanol transition from a technological innovation systems perspective in Brazil. Energy Research and Social Science 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101706

Kumari D, Singh R (2018) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes for biofuel production: A critical Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 90: 877–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.111

Xue J, Wu Y, Fu X, Li N, Sun J, Qiao Y (2020) Study on degradation characteristics and bacterial community structure changes of imobilized cells in straw-alginate beads in marine environment. Bioresource Technology Reports 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100402

Behera S, Kar S, Mohanty R C, Ray R C (2010) Comparative study of bio-ethanol production from mahula (Madhuca latifolia L.) flowers by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zymomonasmobilis. Applied Energy 87: 96-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.018

Saleh M, Cuevas M, Garcia J F, Sanchez S (2014) Valorization of olive stones for xylitol and ethanol production from dilute acid pretreatment via enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation by Pachysolen tannophilus. Biochemical Engineering Journal 90: 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2014.06.023

Gandu B, Rozenfeld S, Hirsch L O, Schechter A, Cahan R (2020) Immobilization of bacterial cells on carboncloth anode using alginate for hydrogen generation in a microbial electrolysis cell. Journal of Power Sources 455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227986

Dubois M, Gilles K A, Hamilton J K, Rebers P A, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry St. Paul 28: 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017 Somogyi M (1952) Notes on sugar determination. Journal of Biological Chemistry 195: 19-22. https://doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)50870-5

Nelson N (1944) A photometric adaptation of Somogy method for determination of glucose. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 153: 375-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)71980-7

Chaovanalikit A, Wrolstad R E (2004) Total anthocyanins and total phenolics of fresh and processed cherries and their antioxidant properties. Food Chemistry and Toxicology 69: 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652621.2004.tb17858.x

Yoshikawa K, Hirasawa ., Shimizu H (2015) Effect of malic enzyme on ethanol production by Synechocystissp. PCC 6803. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 119: 82-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.06.001

Lainioti G C, Kapolos J, Koliadima A, Karaiskakis G (2010) New separation methodologies for distinction of the growth phases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. Journal of chromatography A 1217: 1813-1820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.01.042

Mishra A, Sharma A. K, Sharma S, Bagai R, Mathur A S, Gupta R P, Tuli D K (2016) Lignocellulosic ethanol production employing immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae in packed bed reactor.Renewable Energy: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.010

Sakomoto T, Hasunuma T, Hori Y, Yamada R, Kondo A (2012) Direct etanol production from hemicellulosic materials of rice straw by use of an engineered yeast strain codisplaying three types of hemicellulolytic enzymes on the surface of xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Journal of Biotechnology 158: 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.06.025

Boboescu I-Z, Gelinas M, Beigbeder J-B, Lavoi J-M (2017) A two-step optimization strategy for 2nd generation ethanol production using softwood hemicelullosic hydrolysate as fermentation substrate. Bioresource technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.107

Romero I, Sanchez S, Moya M, Castro E, Ruiz E, Bravo V (2007) Fermentation of olive tree prining acidhydrolysates by Pachysolen tannophilus. Biochemical Engineering Journal 36: 108-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2007.02.006

Zhao L, Zhang X, Tan T (2008) Influence of various glucose/xylose mixtures on ethanol production by Pachysolen tannophilus. Biomass and Bioenergy 32: 1156–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.02.011

Karagoz P, Bill R M, Ozkan M (2019) Lignocellulosic ethanol production: Evaluation of new approaches, cell immobilization and reactor configurations. Renewable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.045 Liu X, Jensen P R, Workman M (2012) Bioconversion of crude glycerol feedstocks into ethanol by Pachysolen tannophilus. Bioresource Technology 104: 559-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.10.065 Ntaikou I, Menis N, Alexandropoulou M, Antonopoulou G, Lyberatos G (2018) Valorization of kitchen biowaste for ethanol production via simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using co-cultures of the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipites.Bioresource Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.109

Da Silva, D. C. M. PRE-TRATAMENTO E HIDROLISE DA CASCA DE UVA PARA LIBERACAO DE ACUCARES FERMENTESCIVEIS. 2016. 113 f. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia e Ciência de alimentos) – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, São Jose do Rio Preto, 2016 Singh A, Bajar S, Bishnoi N R (2014) Enzymatic hydrolysis of microwave alkali pretreated rice husk for ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Scheffersomyces stipites and their co-culture.Fuel 116: 699-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.072

Malik K, Salama E-S, El-Dalatony M. M, Harraz F A, Al-Assari M. S, Zheng Y, Sharma P, Li X (2021) Cofermentation of immobilized yeasts boosted bioethanol production from pretreated cotton stalk lignocellulosic biomass: Long-term investigation. Industrial crops e Products 159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113122

Downloads

Published

2022-09-23

How to Cite

Bertuci, M. L., Silva, M. D. da, Cano, J. P., & Cruz, C. H. G. (2022). Evaluation of the production of second generation Ethanol by co-culture of saccharomyces cerevisiae and pachysolen tannophilus immobilized in Sodium alginate : Avaliação da produção de Etanol de segunda geração por co-cultura de saccharomyces cerevisiae e pachysolen tannophilus imobilizados em alginato de Sódio. Brazilian Journal of Development, 8(9), 63719–63743. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv8n9-220

Issue

Section

Original Papers