Positive and negative aspects of emergency remote teaching in the perception of teachers in Brazil / Aspectos positivos e negativos do ensino remoto de emergência (ERE) na percepção de docentes da rede pública da Paraíba

Authors

  • Ruan Eduardo Carneiro Lucas Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos, São José dos Pinhais, Paraná
  • Lizandra Garcia Lupi Vergara
  • José Flávio Rique Júnior

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv8n3-429

Keywords:

emergency remote teaching, teacher, content analysis, workload.

Abstract

The pandemic due to the new coronavirus transformed people's lives. In order to mitigate the impact of the virus dissemination, schools and universities were closed. And to minimize the impact on the educational environment, the presential classes were replaced by distance education. The problem of this article refers to the identification of aspects positive and negative resulting from the emergency remote teaching (ERT). Thus, this article aims to conduct an exploratory research on the ERT, through interviews with teachers of the public education of Paraiba, Brazil. The methodological procedure was subdivided into three stages: definition of the sample; development of script and conducting interviews with 15 teachers; and compilation of information and Content Analysis, according to Bardin (2011). Some positive aspects of remote teaching were mentioned: more time with the family and flexibility to perform the activities anywhere. Among the negative aspects identified: the process of readaptation to ERT and the absence of organizational support. According to the present study, it can be concluded that the ERT was important to keep the educational process active and brought positive impacts on the quality of life of teachers. However, the ERT increased the workload and negatively impacted the teachers' quality of life.

References

Antoniou A., Polychroni F., Kotroni C. (2009). “Working with students with special educational needs in Greece: teachers' stressors and coping strategies”, International Journal of Special Education, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 100-111.

Aquino E. (2020). “Social distancing measures in the control of the pandemic of COVID -19: potential impacts and challenges in Brazil”, Ciênc. saúde coletiva, Vol. 25(l), No.1, pp. 2423- 46.

Almeida et al. (2020). “Methodologies and Technologies for education in times of pandemic Covid-19”, Brazilian Journal of Health Review, Vol. 3, No.3, 2020.

Appenzeller S. (2020). “New Times, New Challenges: Strategies for Equity of Access to Emergency Remote Education”, Rev. bras. educ. med., Vol. 44, No.1, e155.

Bardin L. (2011). “Content Analysis”. São Paulo: Editions, 1st Ed.

Brognoli E., Pagnan, J., Longen, W. (2020). “Mental Health of Education Workers”, Brazilian Journal of Health Review, Vol.3, No.5, pp.11521-11530.

Daudt L. (2020). “Ferramentas do google sala de aula que vão incrementar sua aula”. Available at: https://www.qinetwork.com.br/6-ferramentas-do-googlesalade-aula-que-vao-incrementar-sua-aula/. Accessed on: 03 mai. 2020.

Diehl L., Marin A. (2016). “Adoecimento mental em professores brasileiros: revisão sistemática da literatura”. Est. Inter. Psicol. Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 64-85.

Guerra I. (2012). “Pesquisa qualitativa e análise do conteúdo - Sentidos e formas de uso”. Portugal: Princípia Editora.

Lhospital A., Gregory A. (2009). “Changes in teacher stress through participation in pre-referral intervention teams”. Psychology in the Schools, Vol. 46, No. 10, pp. 1098-1112.

Mariano M., Muniz H. (2006). “Trabalho docente e saúde: o caso dos professores da segunda fase do ensino fundamental”. Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia.

Mattos V., Konrath A., Azambuja A. (2017). “Introdução à estatística: aplicações em ciências exatas”. Rio de Janeiro: LTC, 1. Ed.

Moreira J., Henriques S., Barros D. (2020). “Transitando de um ensino remoto emergencial para uma educação digital em rede, em tempos de pandemia”. Dialogia.

Oliveira J., Gomes M., Barcellos T. Covid-19 and back to school: listening to the evidence. Ensaio: aval.pol.publ.Educ., Vol. 28, No.108, pp. 555-578.

Rondini C., Pedro K., Duarte C. (2020). “Pandemic of covid-19 and emergency remote teaching: changes in teaching praxis”. Interfaces Científicas - Educação, Vol.10, No.1.

Santos G., Silva M., Belmonte B. (2021). “COVID-19: ensino remoto emergencial e saúde mental de docentes universitários”. Rev. Bras. Saude Mater. Infant, Vol. 21, pp. 237-243.

Saraiva K., Traversini C., Lockmann K. (2020). “Education in COVID-19 times: remote teaching and teacher burnout”. Praxis Educativa, 2020.

Souza K. (2021). “Remote work, teaching health and virtual strike in pandemic scenario”. Trab. educ. saúde, Vol. 19, e00309141.

Silveira K. (2014). “Stress and coping in teachers: an analysis of the literature”. Educ. Rev., Vol. 30, No. 4, pp.15-36, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-31

How to Cite

Lucas, R. E. C., Vergara, L. G. L., & Júnior, J. F. R. (2022). Positive and negative aspects of emergency remote teaching in the perception of teachers in Brazil / Aspectos positivos e negativos do ensino remoto de emergência (ERE) na percepção de docentes da rede pública da Paraíba. Brazilian Journal of Development, 8(3), 22282–22294. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv8n3-429

Issue

Section

Original Papers