Innovations in natural and waste-derived bioflocculants for sustainable harvesting of high-value microalgae
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv9n2-376Palavras-chave:
natural flocculation, microalgae harvesting, downstream, residual actionResumo
Microalgae such as Chlorella and Dunaliella are valuable for biofuels, food, and high-value metabolites, but biomass harvesting remains a cost-intensive bottleneck. Natural and waste-derived bioflocculants are emerging as sustainable alternatives to chemical coagulants, promising lower environmental impact and added nutritional benefits. A systematic literature review was conducted on studies published from 2018 onward, screening 1,977 articles and selecting 26 that met predefined relevance and quality criteria. The review evaluated plant-, fungal-, bacterial-, organic-, and waste-derived flocculants for their harvesting efficiency, residual effects, and economic feasibility in Chlorella and Dunaliella cultures. Fungal and waste-based flocculants routinely achieve >90% recovery, with materials such as banana peel ash and eggshell extract matching or surpassing chemical coagulants. Residual flocculant compounds often enhanced downstream agricultural or nutritional value. Despite promising performance, large-scale economic viability remains limited, highlighting the need for techno-economic optimization to enable industrial adoption of bioflocculants.
Referências
(1) DOLGANYUK, V. et al. Microalgae: a promising source of valuable bioproducts. Biomolecules, v. 10, p. 1-24, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10081153.
(2) CAMACHO, F.; MACEDO, A.; MALCATA, F. Potential industrial applications and commercialization of microalgae in the functional food and feed industries: a short review. Marine Drugs, v. 17, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/md17060312.
(3) AMPOFO, J.; ABBEY, L. Microalgae: bioactive composition, health benefits, safety and prospects as potential high-value ingredients for the functional food industry. Foods, v. 11, n. 12, p. 1744, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11121744.
(4) TAN, T.; YU, J.; SHANG, F. Biorefinery engineering. In: MOO-YOUNG, M. (ed.). Comprehensive Biotechnology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2011. p. 815-828.
(5) PRIYADARSHANI, I.; RATH, B. Commercial and industrial applications of micro algae: a review. Journal of Algal Biomass Utilization, v. 3, ed. 4, p. 89–100, 2012.
(6) SÁNCHEZ, J.; CURT, M. D.; ROBERT, N.; FERNÁNDEZ, J. Biomass resources. In: LAGO, C.; CALDÉS, N.; LECHÓN, Y. (ed.). The Role of Bioenergy in the Bioeconomy. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2019. p.25-111.
(7) GIORDANO, M.; WANG, Q. Microalgae for industrial purposes. In: VAZ JÚNIOR, S. (ed.). Biomass and Green Chemistry. Cham: Springer, 2018. p. 133-167.
(8) AMARAL, M. S. Cultivo de microalga marinha Chlorella sp. como fonte de matéria-prima para produção de biodiesel. 2014. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências) – Pós-graduação em Engenharia Química – Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo, Lorena, 2014.
(9) MOHAMMAD NABAVI, S.; SANCHES SILVA, A. Chapter 6.1 - Challenges and Foresight of Food Supplements. In: Nonvitamin and Nonmineral Nutritional Supplements. Amsterdam: Academic Press, 2019. p. 541-543.
(10) MORAIS JUNIOR, W. G. et al. Microalgae for biotechnological applications: cultivation, harvesting and biomass processing. Aquaculture, v. 528, 2020.
(11) TINOCO, N. A. B.; TEIXEIRA, C. M. L. L.; REZENDE, C. M. The genus Dunaliella: biotechnology and applications. Revista Virtual de Química, v. 7, p. 1421-1440, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-6835.20150078.
(12) POLLE, J. E. W.; JIN, E. S.; BEN-AMOTZ, A. The alga Dunaliella revisited: looking back and moving forward with model and production organisms. Algal Research, v. 49, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2020.101948.
(13) BRASIL, B. S. A. F.; SILVA, F. C. P.; SIQUEIRA, F. G. Microalgae biorefineries: the Brazilian scenario in perspective. New Biotechnology, v. 39, p. 90-98, 2017.
(14) DEPRÁ, M. C. et al. Microalgal biorefineries for bioenergy production: can we move from concept to industrial reality? BioEnergy Research, v. 11, p. 727-747, 2018.
(15) SEVERO, I. A. et al. Biodiesel facilities: what can we address to make biorefineries commercially competitive? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 112, p. 686-705, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.020.
(16) CHANDRASEKHAR, K. et al. Algae biorefinery: a promising approach to promote microalgae industry and waste utilization. Journal of Biotechnology, v. 345, p. 1-16, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.12.008.
(17) OGBONNA, C. N.; NWOBA, E. G. Bio-based flocculants for sustainable harvesting of microalgae for biofuel production: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 139, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110690.
(18) MUBARAK, M.; SHAIJA, A.; SUCHITHRA, T. V. Flocculation: an effective way to harvest microalgae for biodiesel production. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, v. 7, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103221.
(19) KÜHNE, A. de R.; CERON, L. P.; MACHEMER, P. C. Avaliação laboratorial para escolha de coagulante no tratamento de esgoto sanitário / Laboratory evaluation for choice of coagulant in the treatment of sanitary sewage. Brazilian Journal of Animal and Environmental Research, v. 2, n. 3, p. 889–899, 2019.
(20) WANG, Y.; PUSHIRI, H.; LOOI, L. J.; ZULKEFLEE, Z. Applications of bioflocculants for heavy metals removal: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research, v. 16, p. 73, 2022.
(21) AVIV-REUVEN, S.; ROSENFELD, A. Publication patterns’ changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal and short-term scientometric analysis. Scientometrics, v. 126, p. 6761-6784, 2021.
(22) GAO, J. et al. Potentially long-lasting effects of the pandemic on scientists. Nature Communications, v. 12, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26428-z.
(23) RICCABONI, M.; VERGINER, L. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientific research in the life sciences. PLoS ONE, v. 17, 2022.
(24) UNITED NATIONS. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals. New York: United Nations, [s. d.]. Disponível em: https://sdgs.un.org/goals. Acesso em: 14 jul. 2025.
(25) CHEN, H.; WANG, X.; WANG, Q. Microalgal biofuels in China: the past, progress and prospects. GCB Bioenergy, v. 12, p. 1044-1065, 2020.
(26) SUN, J. et al. Microalgae biodiesel production in China: a preliminary economic analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 104, p. 296-306, 2019.
(27) XU, J. et al. Screening of freshwater oleaginous microalgae from South China and its cultivation characteristics in energy grass digestate. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 276, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124193.
(28) JIPANIN, S. J. et al. The monitoring of harmful algae blooms in Sabah. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, v. 1358, 2019.
(29) HII, K. S. et al. Diverse harmful microalgal community assemblages in the Johor Strait and the environmental effects on its community dynamics. Harmful Algae, v. 107, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2021.102077.
(30) HOSSAIN, N. et al. Feasibility of microalgae as feedstock for alternative fuel in Malaysia: a review. Energy Strategy Reviews, v. 32, 2020.
(31) THE FISH SITE. World’s largest mass microalgae biomass production plant set to open in Malaysia in April. 2023. Disponível em: https://thefishsite.com/articles/worlds-largest-mass-microalgae-biomass-production-plant-set-to-open-in-malaysia-in-april. Acesso em: 14 jul. 2025.
(32) GUIMARÃES, A. et al. Wastewater treatment of viticulture in the São Francisco Valley with biocoagulants / Tratamento de água residual da viticultura no vale do São Francisco com biocoagulantes. Brazilian Journal of Animal and Environmental Research, v. 2, n. 5, p. 1702–1709, 2019.
(33) MAGHFIROH, W. et al. Harvesting effectiveness of Chlorella sp. biomass using different flocculation treatments of Moringa oleifera extract and pH conditions. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, v. 209, 2018.
(34) LI, Y.; ZHANG, Z.; DUAN, Y.; WANG, H. The effect of recycling culture medium after harvesting of Chlorella vulgaris biomass by flocculating bacteria on microalgal growth and the functionary mechanism. Bioresource Technology, v. 280, p. 188-198, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.149.
(35) CHEN, J. et al. A comparative study between fungal pellet- and spore-assisted microalgae harvesting methods for algae bioflocculation. Bioresource Technology, v. 259, p. 181-190, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.040.
(36) AYAD, H. I. et al. Bioflocculation harvesting of oleaginous microalga Chlorella sp. using novel lipid-rich cellulolytic fungus Aspergillus terreus (MD1) for biodiesel production. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2023.
(37) CHU, R. et al. A fungal immobilization technique for efficient harvesting of oleaginous microalgae: key parameter optimization, mechanism exploration and spent medium recycling. Science of the Total Environment, v. 790, 2021.
(38) LI, H. et al. A fungal-algal self-flocculation system and its application to treat filter sludge leachate in the sugar industry. Environmental Pollution, v. 338, 2023.
MOHD NASIR, N. et al. Harvesting of Chlorella sp. microalgae using Aspergillus niger as bio-flocculant (39) for aquaculture wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 249, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109373.
(40) SILVA-CASTRO, G. A. et al. Biocoagulation of dried algae Chlorella sp. and pellets of Aspergillus niger in decontamination process of wastewater as a presumed source of biofuel. Journal of Fungi, v. 8, 2022.
(41) TAGHAVIJELOUDAR, M. et al. A rapid, efficient and eco-friendly approach for simultaneous biomass harvesting and bioproducts extraction from microalgae: dual flocculation between cationic surfactants and bio-polymer. Science of the Total Environment, v. 854, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158717.
(42) XU, K et al. Efficient bioflocculation of Chlorella vulgaris with a chitosan and walnut protein extract. Biology, v. 10, 2021.
(43) ZHU, L.; LI, Z.; HILTUNEN, E. Microalgae Chlorella vulgaris biomass harvesting by natural flocculant: effects on biomass sedimentation, spent medium recycling and lipid extraction. Biotechnology for Biofuels, v. 11, 2018.
(44) KUMAR, N. et al. A novel non-starch based cationic polymer as flocculant for harvesting microalgae. Bioresource Technology, v. 271, p. 383-390, 2019.
(45) MOHSENI, A. et al. Cationic starch: an effective flocculant for separating algal biomass from wastewater RO concentrate treated by microalgae. Journal of Applied Phycology, v. 33, p. 917-928, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02348-1.
(46) MAHATA, C. et al. Flocculation characteristics of anaerobic sludge driven-extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) extracted by different methods on microalgae harvesting for lipid utilization. Biochemical Engineering Journal, v. 167, 2021.
(47) NOH, W. et al. Harvesting and contamination control of microalgae Chlorella ellipsoidea using the bio-polymeric flocculant α-poly-L-lysine. Bioresource Technology, v. 249, p. 206-211, 2018.
(48) YANG, Z.; HOU, J.; MIAO, L. Harvesting freshwater microalgae with natural polymer flocculants. Algal Research, v. 57, 2021.
(49) RODERO, M. del R. et al. Harvesting microalgal-bacterial biomass from biogas upgrading process and evaluating the impact of flocculants on their growth during repeated recycling of the spent medium. Algal Research, v. 48, 2020.
(50) NOH, W. et al. The potential of a natural biopolymeric flocculant, ε-poly-L-lysine, for harvesting Chlorella ellipsoidea and its sustainability perspectives for cost and toxicity. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, v. 42, p. 971-978, 2019.
(51) AJALA, S. O.; ALEXANDER, M. L. Application of bio-based alkali to induce flocculation of microalgae biomass. Biomass and Bioenergy, v. 132, 2020.
(52) HADIYANTO, H. et al. Effect of pH, cationic inducer, and clam shells as bio-flocculant in the optimization of the flocculation process for enhanced microalgae harvesting using response surface methodology. Environmental Pollution and Bioavailability, v. 34, p. 338-351, 2022.
(53) BUKHARI, N. A. et al. Enzymatic hydrolysate of palm oil mill effluent as potential substrate for bioflocculant BM-8 production. Waste and Biomass Valorization, v. 11, p. 17-29, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0421-8.
(54) AHMAD, S. et al. Experimental investigation of microalgal harvesting with low-cost bottom ash: influence of temperature and pH with zeta potential and thermodynamic function. Environmental Technology & Innovation, v. 22, 2021.
(55) SUPARMANIAM, U. et al. Flocculation of Chlorella vulgaris by shell waste-derived bioflocculants for biodiesel production: process optimization, characterization and kinetic studies. Science of the Total Environment, v. 702, 2020.
(56) FU, X.; LIU, Y.; ZHU, L.; MOU, H. Flocculation activity of carp protamine in microalgal cells. Aquaculture, v. 505, p. 150-156, 2019.
(57) SHURAIR, M. et al. Harvesting of intact microalgae in single and sequential conditioning steps by chemical and biological-based flocculants: effect on harvesting efficiency, water recovery and algal cell morphology. Bioresource Technology, v. 281, p. 250-259, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.103.
(58) SUPARMANIAM, U. et al. Valorization of fish bone waste as novel bioflocculant for rapid microalgae harvesting: experimental evaluation and modelling using back propagation artificial neural network. Journal of Water Process Engineering, v. 47, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102808.
(59) HODAS, F.; ZORZENON, M. R. T.; MILANI, P. G. Moringa oleifera potential as a functional food and a natural food additive: a biochemical approach. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, v. 93, 2021.
(60) HOSSAIN, M. M. et al. The plant growth-promoting fungus Penicillium spp. GP15-1 enhances growth and confers protection against damping-off and anthracnose in cucumber. Journal of Oleo Science, v. 63, p. 391-400, 2014.
(61) HUNG, R.; LEE, R. S. Applications of Aspergillus in plant growth promotion. In: GUPTA, V. K. (ed.). New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016. p. 223-227.
(62) IL AHN, S.; CHO, S.; CHOI, N. J. Effectiveness of chitosan as a dietary supplement in lowering cholesterol in murine models: a meta-analysis. Marine Drugs, v. 19, 2021.
(63) UYANGA, V. A. et al. Chitosan and chitosan-based composites as beneficial compounds for animal health: impact on gastrointestinal functions and biocarrier application. Journal of Functional Foods, v. 104, 2023.
(64) SANTOS, G. C. de L. et al. Uma revisão de quitosana: polímero que melhora a eficiência do rebanho e a sustentabilidade do sistema de produção / A chitosan review: polymer that improves efficiency of the cattle and production system sustainability. Brazilian Journal of Animal and Environmental Research, v. 3, n. 1, p. 73–88, 2020
(65) ZACHARIAS, M. B. et al. Revestimento de sementes de milho com quitosana e biomassa microalgal. Revista Ciência, Tecnologia e Ambiente, 2022.
(66) MALERBA, M.; CERANA, R. Recent advances of chitosan applications in plants. Polymers, v. 10, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10020118.
(67) ZHOU, T. et al. ε-poly-L-lysine affects the vegetative growth, pathogenicity and expression regulation of necrotrophic pathogens Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea. Journal of Fungi, v. 7, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7100821
(68) CHEN, S.; HUANG, S.; LI, Y.; ZHOU, C. Recent advances in epsilon-poly-L-lysine and L-lysine-based dendrimer synthesis, modification, and biomedical applications. Frontiers in Chemistry, v. 9, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.659304.
(69) JOHANSEN, J. L. et al. The complexity of wood ash fertilization disentangled: effects on soil pH, nutrient status, plant growth and cadmium accumulation. Environmental and Experimental Botany, v. 185, 2021.
(70) ARAUJO, A. C. S. de. et al. Discharge sensitivity of collapsible drip tapes to water temperature. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, v. 25, p. 3-9, 2021.
(71) ROMDHANE, L. et al. Effects of soil amendment with wood ash on transpiration, growth, and metal uptake in two contrasting maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids to drought tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science, v. 12, 2021.
(72) PANDEY, G. Role of calcium in human and animal health. Jigyasa, v. 5, p. 61-65, 2011.
(73) WHITE, P. J.; BROADLEY, M. R. Calcium in plants. Annals of Botany, v. 92, p. 487-511, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg164.
(74) BESSA-JUNIOR, A. P.; GONÇALVES, A. A. Economic and productive analysis of chitosan extracted from shrimp exoskeleton. Acta Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, v. 1, p. 13-28, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2312/ActaFish.2013.1.1.13-28.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
- O conteúdo dos artigos é de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores.
- É permitida a reprodução total ou parcial do conteúdo dos artigos, desde que citada a fonte.
- Artigos com plágio serão recusados, e o autor do plágio perderá o direito de publicar nesta revista.
- Os nomes e endereços informados nesta revista serão utilizados exclusivamente para os serviços prestados por esta publicação e não estão disponíveis para outros fins ou a terceiros.
- Depois de enviar os artigos, os autores cedem os direitos autorais de seus artigos ao BJAER. Se você se arrepender da submissão, o autor tem o direito de solicitar ao BJAER que não publique seu artigo. Porém, essa solicitação deve ocorrer até dois meses antes da divulgação do número que o artigo será publicado.
- O BJAER usa a licença Creative Commons CC BY. Informações sobre esta licença podem ser encontradas em: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/
Brazilian Journal of Animal and Environmental Research (BJAER) se reserva o direito de efetuar nos originais alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores. Os trabalhos finais não serão enviadas aos autores.