Efecto de la edad de corte en la composición química y la digestibilidad in vitro del ensilaje de tres híbridos de maíz blanco cultivados bajo riego

Autores

  • Diego Jiménez Leyva
  • Briceida Ortíz López
  • Carlos Vladimir López Aispuro
  • Jesús José Portillo Loera
  • Leopoldo Raúl Flores Aguirre
  • Soila Maribel Gaxiola Camacho
  • Javier Alonso Romo-Rubio

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv8n4-057

Palavras-chave:

ensilaje, maíz, híbridos, matera seca, digestibilidad

Resumo

Para determinar la influencia de la edad al corte en la composición química y la digestibilidad del ensilado de tres híbridos de maíz blanco (Asgrow 7573, DowDas 2308 y Pioneer 3254W) cultivados bajo riego, se realizó un experimento donde los híbridos fueron asignados aleatoriamente a cinco tiempos de corte (113, 117, 121, 125 y 129 d). Las plantas se cortaron a 12 cm sobre el suelo y se picaron a un tamaño de 3 cm; se prepararon mini ensilajes (5 kg) en bolsas plásticas a las que se les extrajo el aire. Los ensilajes se abrieron después de 45 días, y se determinó la MS, cenizas, PC, FDN, FDA y pH. Los resultados se analizaron por ANOVA para un diseño de bloques completamente al azar con un arreglo factorial 3 x 5. La MS de las plantas de los tres híbridos y sus ensilajes se elevó (p < 0.01) a medida que aumentó la edad de corte. El contenido de PC disminuyó (p < 0.01) al aumentar la edad de corte. Los valores de FDN, FDA y hemicelulosa disminuyeron al aumentar la edad de la planta (p < 0.01). En conclusión, el corte entre los días 117 y 125 mejora la composición química del ensilado de maíz blanco de los tres híbridos estudiados.

   

Biografia do Autor

Diego Jiménez Leyva

Briceida Ortíz López

Carlos Vladimir López Aispuro

Jesús José Portillo Loera

Leopoldo Raúl Flores Aguirre

Soila Maribel Gaxiola Camacho

Javier Alonso Romo-Rubio

Referências

ANDRAE JG, Hunt CW, Pritchard GT, Kennington LR, Harrison JH, Kezar W, Mahanna W. 2001. Effect of hybrid, maturity, and mechanical processing of corn silage on intake and digestibility by beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 79:2268-2275. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7992268x

AOAC .1975. Métodos Oficiales de Análisis. 12ª edición, Asociación de Químicos Analíticos Oficiales, Washington DC.

AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis (5a ed). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, D. C. ISBN 0-935584-42-0 http://sutlib2.sut.ac.th/sut_contents/H125800.pdf

ARRIOLA KG, Kim SC, Huisden CM, Adesogan AT. 2012. Stay-green ranking and maturity of corn hybrids: 1. Effects on dry matter yield, nutritional value, fermentation characteristics, and aerobic stability of silage hybrids in Florida. J. Dairy Sci. 95:964-974. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4524

AVILA CLS, Carvalho BF. 2019. Silage fermentation-updates focusing on the performance of micro-organisms. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 128:966-984. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14450

BAL MA, Coors JG, Shaver RD. 1997. Impact of the maturity of corn for use as silage in the diets of dairy cows on intake, digestion, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci., 80:2497-2503. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76202-7

BALLARD CS, Thomas ED, Tsang DS, Mandebvu P, Sniffen CJ, Endres MI, Carter MP. 2001. Effect of Corn Silage Hybrid on Dry Matter Yield, Nutrient Composition, In Vitro Digestion, Intake by Dairy Heifers, and Milk Production by Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci., 84:442-452. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74494-3

BASSO FC, Adesogan AT, Lara EC, Rabelo CHS, Berchielli TT, Teixeira IAMA, Siqueira GR, Reis RA. 2014. Effects of feeding corn silage inoculated with microbial additives on the ruminal fermentation, microbial protein yield, and growth performance of lambs. Journal of Animal Science. 92:5640-5650. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas2014-8258

CIRIACO FM, Henry DD, Beierbach R, Schulmeister TM, Ruiz-Moreno M, Garcia-Ascolani ME, Podversich F, Dubeux Jr. JCB, DiLorenzo N. 2021. Ruminal in situ degradability of forage components and in vitro organic matter digestibility of warm-season grasses treated with calcium oxide. Transl. Anim. Sci., 5:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab204

DER BEDROSIAN MC, Nestor Jr. KE, Kung Jr. L. 2012. The effects of hybrid, maturity, and length of storage on the composition and nutritive value of corn silage. J. Dairy Sci., 95:5115-5126. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4833

FERRARETTO L F, Shaver R D. 2012. Meta-analysis: Impact of corn silage harvest practices on intake, digestion, and milk production by dairy cows. Prof. Anim. Sci., 28:141-149. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30334-X

FERRARETTO LF, Shaver RD. 2015. Effects of whole-plant corn silage hybrid type on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and lactation performance by dairy cows through a meta-analysis. J. Dairy Sci., 98:1-14. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-9045

FILYA I. 2004. Nutritive value and aerobic stability of whole crop maize silage harvested at four stages of maturity. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 116:141-150. https://doi.org/110.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.06.003

FOROUZMAND MA, Ghorbani GR, Alikhani M. 2005. Influence of Hybrid and Maturity on the nutritional value of corn silage for lactating dairy cows 1: intake, milk production and component yield. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 4:435-441. https://docsdrive.com/pdfs/ansinet/pjn/2005/435-441.pdf

GALLO A, Bertuzzi T, Giuberti G, Moschini M, Bruschi S, Cerioli C, Masoero F. 2015. New assessment based on the use of principal factor analysis to investigate corn silage quality from nutritional traits, fermentation end products and mycotoxins. J. Sci. Food Agric., 96:437-448. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7109

GONZÁLEZ FC, Peña AR, Núñez GH. 2006. Etapas de corte, producción y calidad forrajera de híbridos de maíz de diferente ciclo biológico. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana. 29(2):103-107. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/610/61009818.pdf

HATEW B, Bannink A, van Laar H, de Jonge L H, Dijkstra J. 2016. Increasing harvest maturity of whole-plant corn silage reduces methane emission of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 99:1-15. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10047

HOLT MS, Williams CM, Dschaak CM, Eun J.-S, Young AJ. 2010. Effects of corn silage hybrids and dietary nonforage fiber sources on feed intake, digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and productive performance of lactating Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 93:5397-5407. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3411

HRISTOV AN, Oh J, Firkins JL, Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Waghorn G, Makkar HPS, Adesogan AT, Yang W, Lee C, Gerber PJ, Henderson B, Tricarico JM. 2013. Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. J. Anim. Sci., 91:5045-5069. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6583

HUNT CW, Kezar W, Hinman DD, Combs JJ, Loesche JA, Moen T. 1993. Effects of hybrid and ensiling with and without a microbial inoculant on the nutritional characteristics of whole-plant corn. J. Anim. Sci., 71:38-43. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71138x

INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.). 2013. http://www.inegi.org.mx/. 30 de junio 2013

INIFAP (Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias). 2010. Guía técnica para el área de influencia del campo experimental Valle de Culiacán. Pág. 40. https://es.slideshare.net/anakarencotavillegas/guia-tecnica-para-el-area-deinfluencia-del-campo-experimental-valle-de-culiacan-67705260

JENSEN C, Weisbjerg M, Nørgaard P R, Hvelplund T. 2005. Effect of maize silage maturity on site of starch and NDF digestion in lactating dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 118:279-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.10.011

JIMÉNEZ-LEYVA D, Romo-Rubio J, Flores-Aguirre L, Ortiz-López B, Barajas-Cruz R. 2016. Edad de corte en la composición química del ensilado de maíz blanco asgrow-7573. Abanico veterinario. 6(3):13-23. https://doi.org/10.21929/abavet2016.63.1

JOHNSON L, Harrison JH, Davidson D, Mahanna, WC, Shinners, K, Linder D. 2001. Com silage management: effect of maturity, inoculation, and mechanical processing on pack density and aerobic stability. J. Dairy Sci., 85:434-444. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74092-7

KUNG Jr. L, Moulder BM, Mulrooney CM, Teller RS, Schmidt RJ. 2008. The Effect of Silage Cutting Height on the Nutritive Value of a Normal Corn Silage Hybrid Compared with Brown Midrib Corn Silage Fed to Lactating Cows. J. Dairy Sci., 91:1451-1457. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0236

LEDEZMA EAP, Moreno YM, Medina LT, Herrera MM, Polo AP. 2025. Rendimiento y calidad nutricional de cuatro cultivares de maíz (Zea mays) destinados a ensilaje como alimentación animal. Brazilian Journal of Animal and Environmental Research. 8(2):e80122. https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv8n2-050

NASEM (National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine). 2016. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. Eight Revised Edition. The National Academies Press. Washington, D.C. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/19014/nutrient-requirements-of-beef-cattle-eighth-revised-edition

NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. The National Academy Press. Washington, D.C. pp. 13-21 y 284. ISBN 0-309-06997-1 https://profsite.um.ac.ir/~kalidari/software/NRC/HELP/NRC%202001.pdf

NÚÑEZ HG, Payán JA G, Peña AR, González FC, Ruiz OB, Arzola CA. 2010. Caracterización agronómica y nutricional del forraje de variedades de especies anuales en la región norte de México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 1(2):85–98. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rmcp/v1n2/v1n2a1.pdf

STATISTIX 9. User´s Manual. Analytical Software. 2007: 243-246, 287-289, y 296-314. ISBN 978-1-881789-07-9.

STEEL GDR, Torrie HJ, Dickey DA. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. Third edition. Edt. Mc. Graw Hill. https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=gkJczwEACAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=editions:ISBN0070609268&hl=es

TAYLOR CC, Allen MS. 2005. Corn Grain Endosperm Type and Brown Midrib 3 Corn Silage: Site of Digestion and Ruminal Digestion Kinetics in Lactating Cows. J. Dairy Sci., 88:1413-1424. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72809-5

TILLEY J, Terry R. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. The Journal of the British Grassland Society. 18:104-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x

VAN SOEST PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74(10):3583-3597. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

ZHANG R, Weiyun Z, Wen Z, Jianxin L, Shengyong M. 2014. Effect of dietary forage sources on rumen microbiota, rumen fermentation and biogenic amines in dairy cows. J. Sci. Food Agric., 94(9):1886-1895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6508

Downloads

Publicado

2025-11-05

Como Citar

Leyva, D. J., López, B. O., Aispuro, C. V. L., Loera, J. J. P., Aguirre, L. R. F., Camacho, S. M. G., & Romo-Rubio, J. A. (2025). Efecto de la edad de corte en la composición química y la digestibilidad in vitro del ensilaje de tres híbridos de maíz blanco cultivados bajo riego. Brazilian Journal of Animal and Environmental Research, 8(4), e83400. https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv8n4-057

Edição

Seção

Artigos originais