Evidence for visual evasion of arctiid moth predators: the influence of conspicuous coloration patterns on predation in Utetheisa ornatrix caterpillar models

Autores

  • Thiago A. Leão-Pires
  • Martins F. Pereja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv8n1-097

Palavras-chave:

defense strategies, warning coloration, aposematism, cryptic coloration, unpalatability

Resumo

In nature, organisms have developed various defense mechanisms against predation. Aposematism, in which animals display conspicuous coloration combined with a defense mechanism to deter predation, is one of the primary defensive strategies studied. Conspicuous color patterns have been the focus of intense and justified attention by biologists since the time of Charles Darwin. Many unpalatable species, especially among insects, exhibit conspicuous coloration. However, by evolving conspicuous coloration similar to that of an unpalatable species, palatable animals can also gain an evasive advantage through mimicry, without the need to develop a real defense. In Utetheisa ornatrix, coloration manifests in different patterns, including black, yellow, and white, and is considered conspicuous and aposematic for some species. This study evaluated the influence of conspicuous coloration on predation in U. ornatrix larval models, testing two hypotheses: first, that models with conspicuous coloration are less predated than cryptic or non-conspicuous models; second, that models with a fully developed conspicuous pattern are less predated than those with intermediate patterns or purely black coloration. The results indicate that among the tested conspicuous coloration models, predators avoided the pattern most similar to U. ornatrix and the cryptic pattern, showing a preference for the non-conspicuous pattern. Additionally, among the conspicuous patterns, the black-and-white and fully developed patterns were less predated than the black-yellow and purely black patterns, with the latter being the most predated.

Referências

Assis, M.A. 1999. Florística e caracterização das comunidades vegetais da Planície Costeira de Picinguaba, Ubatuba/SP. PhD Dissertation, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. 248 p

Barber, N. A. 2012. Clay caterpillars: a tool for ecology & evolution laboratories. The American Biology Teacher, 74, 513-517.

Bates, H. W. 1862. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley (Lepidoptera: Heliconidae). Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 23, 495-556.

Bowers, M. D., Brown, I. L. e Wheye, D. 1985. Bird predation as a selective agent in a butterfly population. Evolution 39, 93±103.

Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, 1st edn. John Murray, London.

Daly, B. G., Dickman, C. R., & Crowther, M. S. (2008). Causes of habitat divergence in two species of agamid lizards in arid central Australia. Ecology, 89, 65-76.

DeVries, P. J. 1987. The butterflies of Costa Rica e their natural history. Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Dussourd, D. E., Ubik, K., Harvis, C., Resch, J., Meinwald, J., e Eisner, T. 1988. Biparental defensive endowment of eggs with acquired plant alkaloid in the moth Utethesia ornatrix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 5992–5996.

Edmunds, M. E. 1974. Defence in animals: a survey of anti-predator defences. Harlow, Burnt Mill, Engle.

Eisner, T. e Meinwald, J. 1987. Alkaloid-derived pheromones e sexual selection in Lepidoptera. In, G. D. Prestwich e G. J. Blomquist (eds.), Pheromone Biochemistry, Academic Press, Florida, pp. 251-269.

Endler, 1988. Frequency-dependent selection, crypsis, e aposematism. Phil.Trans. Roy Soc.Lond. B 319:469-472.

Futahashi, R., e Fujiwara, H. 2008. Juvenile hormone regulates buttefly larval pattern switches. Science 319: 1061.

Gamberale-Stille, G. 2001. Benefit by contrast: an experiment with live aposematic prey. Behavioral Ecology 12, 768–772.

Guilford, T. 1986. How do warning colours work? Conspicuousness may reduce recognition errors in experienced predadors. Anim. Behav. 34, 286-288.

Holloway, J.D. 1988. The moths of Borneo (Part 6): Arctiidae: Syntominae, Enchromiinae, Arctiinae, Aganainae (to Noctuidae). Southdene, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 101p.

Hunter, J. S. (2009). Familiarity breeds contempt: effects of striped skunk color, shape, and abundance on wild carnivore behavior. Behavioral Ecology, 20(6), 1315-1322.

Janzen, D., Hallwachs, W. e Burns, J. M. 2010. A tropical horde of counterfeit predator eyes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107: 11659 Ð11665.

Mallet, J. e Singer, M. C.. 1987. Individual selection, kin selection, e the shifting balance in the evolution of warning colours: The evidence from butterflies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 32:337-350.

Marek, P. E., & Bond, J. E. 2009. A Müllerian mimicry ring in Appalachian millipedes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(24), 9755-9760.

María Arenas, L., Walter, D., & Stevens, M. 2015. Signal honesty and predation risk among a closely related group of aposematic species. Scientific reports, 5, 11021.

Muller, F. 1879. Ituna e Thyridia; a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. Trans. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 20-29.

Murphy, S. M. 2004. Enemy-free space maintains swallow-tail butterfly host shift. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101: 18048-18052.

Nóbrega, G. A., Eisenlohr, P. V., Paciência, M. L. B., Prado, J., & Aidar, M. P. M. (2011). A composição florística e a diversidade de pteridófitas diferem entre a Floresta de Restinga e a Floresta Ombrófila Densa das Terras Baixas do Núcleo Picinguaba/PESM, Ubatuba/SP?. Biota Neotropica, 11, 153-164.

Portugal, A.H.A., e Trigo, J. R.. 2005. Similarity of cuticular lipids between a caterpillar e its host plant: a way to make prey undetectable for predatory ants? J. Chem. Ecol. 31: 2551-2561.

Peel, M.C., Finlayson, B.L., and T.A. McMahon, 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions Discussions 4: 439–473.

Robinson, M. L., Weber, M. G., Freedman, M. G., Jordan, E., Ashlock, S. R., Yonenaga, J., & Strauss, S. Y. (2023). Macroevolution of protective coloration across caterpillars reflects relationships with host plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 290(1991), 20222293.

Roque-Albelo, L., Schroeder, F.C. , Conner, W. E., Bezzerides, A., Hoebeke, E.R., Meinwald, J. e Eisner, T. 2002. Chemical defense e aposematism: the case of Utetheisa galapagensis. Chemoecology 12:153–157.

R Core Team (2023). _R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <https://www.R-project.org/>.

Schuler, W. e Hesse, E. 1985. On the function of warning coloration: a black e yellow pattern inhibits prey-attack by naive domestic chicks. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol, 16: 249-255.

Stefanescu, C., B. Pintureau, H.-P. Tschorsnig, e J. Pujade-Villar. 2003. The parasitoid complex of the butterfly Iphiclides podalirius feisthamelii (Lepidoptera: Papilion-idae) in north-east Spain. J. Nat. Hist. 37: 379-396.

Downloads

Publicado

2025-02-18

Como Citar

Leão-Pires, T. A., & Pereja, M. F. (2025). Evidence for visual evasion of arctiid moth predators: the influence of conspicuous coloration patterns on predation in Utetheisa ornatrix caterpillar models. Brazilian Journal of Animal and Environmental Research, 8(1), e77648. https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv8n1-097

Edição

Seção

Artigos originais