Comparative study of the parasite load in two breeds of sheep in Mexico

Autores

  • Mariana Paz-Calderón Nieto
  • Dulce María Carrasco Aguilar
  • María del Pilar Mancera Hernández
  • Ricardo E. Caicedo Rivas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv7n2-112

Palavras-chave:

infestation, FAMACHA, body condition and metabolic profile

Resumo

Gastrointestinal parasites (GIP) produce great economic losses in livestock systems in Mexico, causing deficiencies in productive systems, mainly in food production; Gastrointestinal parasitosis constitutes a mechanism of loss, due to the high degrees of infestation experienced by these ruminants, which mainly causes anemia, liver and kidney damage, weight loss and large reproductive losses such as very prolonged postpartum anestrus. The prevalence of parasites in sheep is estimated between 63.4% to 90.2% prevalence, in a population of 8.9 million sheep in Mexico, distributed in different zoogeographic zones of the country. Based on the above, the objective of this study was to establish the foundations for the development of a breed or breeds of sheep resistant to gastrointestinal parasites (PGI). To achieve this objective, 183 sheep of the Criolla and Dorper breeds were randomly selected. These were under a grazing system and in addition, phenotypic characteristics were determined such as: body condition, FAMACHA, hematocrit (%). Fecal samples were taken from each animal and analyzed using sedimentation, flotation and direct coproparasitological tests, and the parasite load, eggs per gram of feces (HPG), was determined using the Mac Master chamber method (modified) by animal. To detect the damage caused by the different degrees of parasite infestation, tests were carried out on the metabolomics-metabolic profile of each animal depending on the type of parasite and total parasite load. The data obtained showed that the most prevalent GIP were: Strongyloides papillosus (38.15%), Trichostrongylus spp (32.91%), Haemonchus contortus (21.25%), Trichuris ovis (7.69), Oesophagostomun spp (2 .56%), Ascaris spp (1.56). and Fasciola hepatica (1.32%), this last parasite is not considered a gastrointestinal parasite, according to many authors, however, the laboratory does consider it. The values ​​of metabolites detected through the metabolic profile showed that the higher the parasite load-EGF, these metabolites fluctuated at low levels compared to clinically healthy animals (CHA) such as: glucose, PT, albumin, creatinine, while bilirubin tends to increase, the greater the parasite load-HPG, but this will also depend on the type of parasites that each animal presents; while the alkaline phosphatase enzyme tends to decrease when the EGF is higher. Hematocrit (%) values ​​decreased with respect to high parasite loads, mainly due to Haemochus contortus and Fasciola hepatica. In conclusion: GIP parasites play a significant role in the productive and reproductive development of these breeds of small ruminants, therefore, to produce sheep resistant to GIP it is necessary to detect which parasites are the most prevalent and which ones affect the metabolic activity of each animal or groups of sheep depending on their breed and diet, mainly, and that Creole sheep are more resistant to high GIP loads, they tend to lose weight, but not their reproductive capacity, finally their immune system has to control these loads of GPI, becoming animals with a high degree of resilience in relation to the Dorper breed.

Referências

Alba-Hurtado, F.; Muñoz-Guzmán, M.A. 2013. Inmune responses associated with resistence to haemonchosis in Sheep. Biomed. Res. Int.2013, 1-11.

Baker R.L. 1995. Genetics of disease resistance in small ruminants in Africa, En: Gray GD, Woolaston RR, Eaton BT, editors Breeding for resistance to infectious disease of small ruminants. ACIAR Monograph No.34, Camberra, Australia. P120-128.

Balic A , Bowles V M and Meeusen E. N. T. 2002. Mechanisms of immunity to Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep. 24(1):39-46. Doi: 10.1046/j.0141-9838.2001.00432. x.

Bishop S. C. 2012. A consideration of resistance and tolerance for ruminant nematode infections. Front Genet. 2012; 3: 168. https://doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00168

Bishop, S. C., and Stear, M. J. 2003. Modeling of host genetics and resistance to infectious diseases: understanding and controlling nematode infections. Vet. Parasitol. 115, 147–166.

Burke, J. 2005. Management of barber pole worm in sheep and goats in the Southern U.S. Small farms research (in line). Disponible en: http://www.attra.org/downloads/goat_barber_pole.pdf.

Caicedo, R.R.E., Torres Beltrán, A., Hernández, Z.J.S., Resendiz Martínez, R., Pérez y Terrón, R. & Cabrera Bautista, E. 2009. Effects o β2-agonist-adrenergic in the diagnosis of fasciolosis in animal ruminant Bos indicus X Bos taurus, in the State of Puebla, Mexico. In International Symposium on sustainable Improvement of animal production and health. FAO/IAEA, Vienna, Austria, Vol1: 183-187

Caicedo Rivas, R.E.; Paz-Calderón Nieto, M.; Badillo M., S.V. 2011. Physiopathology effects in bovines (Bos taurus X Bos indicus) with fascioliasis in México. Actas Iberoamericanas de Conservación Animal, AICA: Vol. 1:332- 335

Caicedo R.E. 2018, Informe Anual, México, Regional Project RLA/ARCAL/5/071, “Decreasing the parasite infestation Rate of Sheep”. FAO/OIEA.

Caicedo Rivas, R.E., Paz-Calderón. N.M, Benavides B. A., y Leal P. A. 2021. Fascioliasis effect on the metabolic profile in creole cattle in México. Latin America Archives of animal Production. Vol.29, N0. 1-2. https://doi.org/10.53588/alpa.291207

Castells D. 2009. Evaluación de resistencia genética de ovinos Corriedale a los nematodos gastrointestinales en Uruguay: Heredabilidad y correlaciones genéticas entre el recuento de huevos de nematodos y características productivas [Book]. - Montevideo, Uruguay: Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay. Tesis de Maestría.

Collar, C.; Glen, J.; Hullinger, P.; Reed, B.; Rowe, J.; Stull, C. 2000. Animal care series: goat care practices. University of California. USA. (in line). Available in: http://www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/vetext/INF-GO_ CarePrax2000.pdf.

Dominik, S. 2005. Quantitative trait loci for internal nematode resistance in sheep: a review. Gen Select Evol. 37(Suppl. 1): 583-96.

Espinosa, O.V.; García, H.L.A; Rivera, H.G; Alonso, P-A.; Meléndez, G.R.; López, D.C. 2005. Importancia Socioeconómica de la lechería familiar en una comunidad del Estado de México, Memorias del XXIX Congreso Nacional de Buiatría. Puebla, Puebla, México. Asociación Mexicana de Médicos Veterinarios Especialistas en Bovinos, A.C. pág.307.

Gala, R.J.R.; Vega, M.V.E.; Cuatianquiz, M.Y. 2002. Evaluation de la Production de leche bajo un Sistema de Production Animal familiar. Memorias XXXVIII Reunión de Investigación Pecuaria: INIFAP, pag.257

Gauly, M.; Schackert, M.; Erhardt, G. 2004. Use of FAMACHA© Eye colour chart in the context of breeding for parasite resistance in lambs exposed to an artificial Haemonchus contortus infection. Detsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift. Alfeld, Alemania. 111 (11): 430-433.

Gogolin K., Maddox S., Fabb S. and Brandon M. 1992. Genetic markers for selection of parasite resistance in livestock in animal parasite control utilizing biotechnology. Edited by: W.K. Yong. C.R.C. Press, USA. P.407-456

Gray O. 1987: Genetic resistance to haemonchosis in sheep, Parasitology Today. V8l8:253-255

Hutchens, T.; Harmon, R. 2005. County Assessment of FAMACHA© chart. Goat producer’s newsletter. University of Kentucky. (in line). Available in: http://www.ukg.edu/Ag/AnimalSciense/goats/newsletter/fgoatproducersnewsletter019052.pdf.

Kaplan, R. 2004. Responding to the emergence of multiple-drug resistant Haemonchus contortus: Smart drenching and FAMACHA©. Proceeding of the Georgia Veterinary Medical Association 2004 Food Animal Conference. Georgia, USA. 12 p.

Machen, R.; Craddock, F.; Craig, T.; Fuchs, T. 1994. A Haemonchus contortus management plan for sheep and goats in Texas. Texas Agriculture Extension Service. L-5095 (in line). Available in: http://animalscience.tamu.edu/ansc/publications/sheep pubs/L5095haemonchus.pdf.

McCance, K.L. y Huether, S.E. 1990. Pathophysiology: Clinical concepts of disease processes. St Louis, MO: Mosby.

Matias-Silva D. de F., Nunes-Costa J., Lôpo A. A.,

Oliveira-Costa N.A., Ornelas Almeida. M. Â and Carvalho V. S. 2010. PROTEINOGRAMA Sérico de cordeiros mestiços (santa inês x dorper) do nascimento até o desmamé: efeito do desenvolvimento etário e do monitoramento da ingestão do colostro. Ciência Animal Brasileira, 11(4), 794–805.

Maurer, T. 2005. Reducing parasite problems in small ruminants. Attra News. 13(1): 1-6 (en línea). Disponible en http://attra.ncat.org/attradigest/ATTRAnews_Jan05.pdf

Meira S. Jr. E. B., Rizzo H., Benesi F. J. and Gregory, L. 2009. Influência dos factores sexuais e etârios sobre a proteina total, fracao albumina e actividade sérica de aspartato aminotransferase e gama glutamiltrasferase de ovinos da raca Santa Ines. [Publicación periódica]. - Sao Paulo: Animal Science. Vol.46, No.6.

Molento M. C. Tasca, A. Gallo, M. Ferreira, R. Bononi, E. Stecca. 2004. Método FAMACHA© como parámetro clínico individual de infecçâo por Haemonchus contortus em pequeños rumiantes. 2004.: Ciêcia Rural. - 4: Vol. 34. 13-

Morales G., Pino L.A., Sandoval E., Jiménez D. y Morales J. 2012. Relación entre la condición corporal y el nivel de infestación parasitaria en bovinos a pastoreo como criterio para el tratamiento antihelmíntico selectivo. Rev. Inv. Vet. Perú; 23 (1): 80-89

Myers, G. 2004. Preliminary observations on the use of the FAMACHA© chart. Goat Producer’s Newsletter. University of Kentucky. Available in:

Papadopoulos E. 2008. Anthelmintic resistance in sheep nematodes. Small Rumi. Res., 76:99-103

Pérez, J.; García, P.; Hernández, S.; Mozos, E.; Cámara, S.; Martínez, A. 2003. Experimental Haemonchosis in goats of single and multiple infections in the host response. Veterinary Parasitology 111(4): 333-342

Piccione G., F. Arfuso, C. Faggio, S. Casella, A. Zumbo, and M. Panzera. 2013. Serum proteins profile in Comisana lambs during the first month of life. Arch. Anim. Breed., 56, 742–750. https://doi.org/10.7482/0003-9438-56-074

Prieto J.M; Yuste A. J.R. 2010. La Clínica y el Laboratorio. Edit, Elsevier-Masson, XXI edition. 855 Pages.

Rojas Hernández, S.; I. Gutiérrez Segura.; J. Olivares Pérez; M.T. Valencia Almazán. 2007. Prevalencia de nemátodos gastrointestinales en ovinos en pastoreo en la parte alta del MPIO. De Cuetzala del Progreso, Guerrero-México. REDVET. Revista electrónica de Veterinaria. Vol. VIII, NO. 9. ISSN 1695-7504 2007

Rossanigo, C.; W. Page. 2017. Evaluación de FAMACHA en el control de nematodes gastrointestinales en cabras de San Luis (Argentina). Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, vol. 43, núm. 3, pp. 239- 246

Sayer G.; Sweeney T. 2005: Gastrointestinal nematode infection in sheep-a review of the alternatives to anthelmintics in parasite control. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 21(1):21-37-

SIAP. 2017. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y pesquera (Versión Electrónica), Ovino Población Ganadera, https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/412568/ovino_2017.pdf

Torres-Hernández G and Morteo-Gómez R. 2009. Resistencia genética del hospedero: Una herramienta más para el control de los parásitos gastrointestinales. En: González GR, Berumen AAC, editores. Avances en el control de la parasitosis gastrointestinal de ovinos en el trópico. Tabasco, México: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. p. 93-106

Treseler M.K. 1999. Laboratorio Clínico y Pruebas de diagnóstico, XXII edition. Edit. Manual Moderno. 699 Pages

Downloads

Publicado

2024-06-27

Como Citar

Nieto, M. P.-C., Aguilar, D. M. C., Hernández, M. del P. M., & Rivas, R. E. C. (2024). Comparative study of the parasite load in two breeds of sheep in Mexico. Brazilian Journal of Animal and Environmental Research, 7(2), e70826 . https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv7n2-112

Edição

Seção

Artigos originais