Non-invasive methodology for the ecotoxicological sampling of anatids in urban and peri-urban areas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34188/bjaerv7n2-048Palavras-chave:
biomonitoring, ecotoxicology, pollution, urban waterbirdsResumo
Urban waterbirds serve as crucial bioindicators for evaluating environmental pollution in urban areas, necessitating a focus on tailored non-invasive ecotoxicological biomonitoring methods. This paper adopts a multidisciplinary perspective to underscore the pivotal role of biomonitoring in gauging environmental quality and identifying threats. Emphasizing the versatility and ease of sampling urban birds, we highlight their correlation with human exposure to pollutants, alongside the significant role of wetlands, particularly Ramsar sites, in conservation endeavors and as habitats for migratory birds. Additionally, the paper delves into the relevance of urban birds in monitoring pollutants, showcasing their efficacy in reflecting urbanization or pollution gradients. Proposed non-invasive biomonitoring techniques, including feather and feces analysis, offer practical means to assess heavy metal, microplastics, and other pollutant concentrations without harming the avian species. A comprehensive methodology proposal for waterbird sampling, encompassing pre-sampling activities, basic and specialized laboratory characterization, and data collection in a Central Mexican Ramsar site, is detailed as examples and experiences into these considerations. Concluding insights underscore the impact of emerging pollutants, such as microplastics, on waterbird health and nutritional status, advocating for multivariate statistical analysis to elucidate correlations between morphological characteristics, elemental composition, and pollutant presence.
Referências
Albayrak T, Mor F, (2011). Comparative tissue distribution of heavy metals in house sparrow (Passer domesticus, Aves) in polluted and reference sites in Turkey. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 87:457–462.
Amat, J. A., & Green, A. J. (2010). Waterbirds as bioindicators of environmental conditions. Conservation monitoring in freshwater habitats: A practical guide and case studies, 45-52.
Bailly J, Scheifler R, Belvalette M, Garnier S, Boissier E et al., (2016). Negative impact of urban habitat on immunity in the great tit Parus major. Oecologia 182:1053–1062.
Bichet C, Scheifler R, Coeurdassier M, Julliard R, Sorci G et al., (2013). Urbanization, trace metal pollution, and malaria prevalence in the house sparrow. PLoS ONE 8:e53866.
Burger J, Bowman R, Woolfenden GE, Gochfeld M, (2004). Metal and metalloid concentrations in the eggs of threatened Florida scrub-jays in suburban habitat from south-central Florida. Sci Total Environ 328:85–193.
Burger, J., & Gochfeld, M. (1993). Lead and cadmium accumulation in eggs and fledgling seabirds in the New-York bight. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 12(2), 261–267.
Burger, J., Nisbet, I. C. T., & Gochfeld, M. (1992). Metal Levels In regrown feathers—assessment of contamination on the wintering and breeding grounds in the same individuals. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 37(3), 363–374.
Cai F, Calisi RM, 2016. Seasons and neighborhoods of high lead toxicity in New York City: the feral pigeon as a bioindicator. Chemosphere 161:274–279.
Chace JF, Walsh JJ, (2006). Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 74:46–69.
Fitzner, R. E., Gray, R. H., & Hinds, W. T. (1995). Heavy-metal concentrations in great blue heron fecal castings in Washington State—a technique for monitoring regional and global trends in environmental contaminants. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 55(3), 398–403.
Fokidis HB, Deviche P, 2012. Brain arginine vasotocin immunoreactivity differs between urban and desert curve-billed thrashers Toxostoma curvirostre: relationships with territoriality and stress physiology. Brain Behav Evol 79:84–97
Foltz SL, Ross AE, Laing BT, Rock RP, Battle KE et al., (2015). Get off my lawn: increased aggression in urban song sparrows is related to resource availability. Behav Ecol 26:1548–1557
Gerhardt A, (2001). Bioindicator species and their use in biomonitoring. In: Developed under the auspices of the UNESCO. Environmental Monitoring I. Encycloped
Gonzalez-Gomez, X., Cambeiro-Perez, N., Martínez-Carballo, E., Simal-Gandara, J., (2018). Screening of organic pollutants in pet hair samples and the significance of environmental factors. Sci. Total Environ. 625, 311e319. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.scitotenv.2017.12.270.
Hoff Brait CH, Antoniosi Filho NR, (2010). Use of feathers of feral pigeons Columba livia as a technique for metal quantification and environmental monitoring. Environ Monit Assess 179:457–467.
Hollamby, S., Afema-Azikuru, J., Waigo, S., Cameron, K., Gandolf, A. R., Norris, A., & Sikarskie, J. G. (2006). Suggested guidelines for use of avian species as biomonitors. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 118(1–3), 13–20.
Kark S, Iwaniuk A, Schalimtzek A, Banker E, (2007). Living in the city: can anyone become an ‘urban exploiter’? J Biogeogr 34:638–651.
Kocagöz, R., Onmuş, O., Onat, I., Çağdaş, B., Sıkı, M., & Orhan, H. (2014). Environmental and biological monitoring of persistent organic pollutants in waterbirds by non-invasive versus invasive sampling. Toxicology letters, 230(2), 208-217.
Meille`re A, Brischoux F, Parenteau C, Angelier F, (2015). Influence of urbanization on body size, condition, and physiology in an urban exploiter: a multicomponent approach. PLoS ONE 10:e0135685
Pollack, L., Ondrasek, N. R., & Calisi, R. (2017). Urban health and ecology: the promise of an avian biomonitoring tool. Current zoology, 63(2), 205-212.
Schilderman PA, Hoogewerff JA, van Schooten FJ, Maas LM, Moonen EJ et al., (1997). Possible relevance of pigeons as an indicator species for monitoring air pollution. Environ Health Perspect 105:322–330.
Segar D, Phillips D, Stamman E (1985) Design of bioindicator based programs to monitor ocean status and trends. Oceans 17:926–931
Siddig AAH, Ellison AM, Ochs A, Villar-Leeman C, Lau MK, 2016. How do ecologists select and use indicator species to monitor ecological change? Insights from 14 years of publication in Ecological Indicators. Ecol Indic 60:223–230.
Susanti, R., Dafip, M., Christijanti, W., & Yuniastuti, A. (2021b). The interaction of intestinal bacteria and feed: A case study of intensive-duck husbandry in Central Java. J Indones Trop Anim Agric, 46(2), 154-165.
Susanti, R., Yuniastuti, A., & Fibriana, F. (2021a). The Evidence of microplastic contamination in Central Javanese local ducks from intensive animal husbandry. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 232(5), 178.
Swaileh, K. M., & Sansur, R. (2006). Monitoring urban heavy metal pollution using the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 8(1), 209–213
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
- O conteúdo dos artigos é de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores.
- É permitida a reprodução total ou parcial do conteúdo dos artigos, desde que citada a fonte.
- Artigos com plágio serão recusados, e o autor do plágio perderá o direito de publicar nesta revista.
- Os nomes e endereços informados nesta revista serão utilizados exclusivamente para os serviços prestados por esta publicação e não estão disponíveis para outros fins ou a terceiros.
- Depois de enviar os artigos, os autores cedem os direitos autorais de seus artigos ao BJAER. Se você se arrepender da submissão, o autor tem o direito de solicitar ao BJAER que não publique seu artigo. Porém, essa solicitação deve ocorrer até dois meses antes da divulgação do número que o artigo será publicado.
- O BJAER usa a licença Creative Commons CC BY. Informações sobre esta licença podem ser encontradas em: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/
Brazilian Journal of Animal and Environmental Research (BJAER) se reserva o direito de efetuar nos originais alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores. Os trabalhos finais não serão enviadas aos autores.
