Innovative design method for dual-Bell nozzles in rocket propulsion systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38152/bjtv7n4-051Abstract
The primary aim of a dual bell nozzle is to enhance performance by utilizing the principle of auto-adaptation based on altitude variations. This system offers the advantage of automatically adjusting the flow for two operational modes (low and high altitude) without the need for mechanical activation. Although the concept is theoretically straightforward, the structural forces involved can be considerable . This study presents a numerical approach for designing such nozzles. It utilizes transonic flow methods to establish the starting line for subsequent supersonic calculations, while the method of characteristics is employed to create the base nozzle profile. The base nozzle is modeled as a second-degree polynomial, with its constants derived from initial conditions. To reduce the weight of the nozzle, truncation is performed at a point that achieves the best compromise between weight and performance. The profile of the second curve is calculated to maintain a constant wall pressure, which is accomplished using the direct method of characteristics applied to a centered expansion wave with an intensity ratio of P2/P1 at the junction. After generating the profile, an analysis of the evolution of thermodynamic parameters (such as pressure and Mach number) and aerodynamic performance is conducted. To ensure accuracy, the results are compared with numerical databases from ONERA nozzle studies. Flow simulations in the nozzle are carried out using the Ansys 13.0 environment with various mesh types. Additionally, to mitigate boundary layer effects, the k-ω SST turbulence model is utilized in the simulations. The results obtained from the method of characteristics and numerical simulations are compared with computed results from the literature, showing good agreement and similarity.
References
Foster, C. and Cowles, F., “Experimental study of gas-flow separation in over-expanded exhaust nozzles for rocket motors,” Progress Report No. 4-103. JPL, 1949.
Horn, M. and Fisher S., “Altitude compensating nozzles,” Rocket dyne Division. NASA-CR-194719, 1994.
Hagemann, G., et al., “Advanced rocket nozzles,” J. of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 620-634, 1998.
Frey, M. and Hagemann, G. “Critical assessment of dual-bell nozzles,” J. of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 137-143, 1999.
Hagemann, G., et al., “Experimental and analytical design verification of the dual-bell concept,” J. of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 116-122, 2002.
Génin, C. and Stark, R., “Flow Transition in dual-bell nozzles,” Shock Waves, Vol. 19, pp. 265-270, Springer-Verlag, 2009.
Proshchanka, D., et al., “Control of operation mode transition in dual-bell nozzle,” 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint propulsion conference, Nashville, TN, AIAA 2010-6815, 2010.
Stark, R. and Génin, C., “Side loads in dual-bell nozzles, Part I Phenomenology,” 2010,
Verma, S. B., et al., “Cold gas dual-bell tests in high-altitude simulation chamber,” Shock Waves, Vol. 21, pp. 131-140, Springer-Verlag, 2011.
Verma, S. B., et al., “Cold-gas experiments to study the flow separation characteristics of a dual-bell nozzle during its transition modes,” Shock Waves, Vol. 20, pp. 191-203, Springer-Verlag, 2010.
Kbab.H and All “Numerical investigation of supersonic flows on innovative nozzles (dual bell nozzle) » Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics 16 (4), 819-829
H Kbab, M Sellam, T Hamitouche, S Bergheul, L Lagab « Design and performance evaluation of a dual bell nozzle” Acta Astronautica 130, 52-59
Liu, Y., Li, P. Analysis of the Aspiration Drag in Dual-Bell Nozzles. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 24, 467–474 (2023).
Wu, K., Sohn, G.C., Deng, R. et al. Study on wall pressure and hysteresis behaviors of anovel dual-bell nozzle. J Mech Sci Technol 37, 4639–4646 (2023).
Ferrero, A., Conte, A., Martelli, E., Nasuti, F., Pastrone, D. (2022). Dual-bell nozzle with fluidic control of transition for space launchers. Acta Astronautica, 193, 130-137.
