Comparative metabolic profile of mice fed a grain-based controlled diet and a purified controlled diet

Authors

  • Jenifer Souza de Almeida
  • Sandra Andreotti
  • Felipe Nunes de Camargo
  • Ayumi Cristina Medeiros Komino
  • Carla Roberta de Oliveira Carvalho

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv9n1-108

Keywords:

grain-based diet, purified diet, metabolic parameters, C57BL/6 male mice

Abstract

Grain-based control diets and purified diets are widely used in metabolic studies involving rodents, although their compositional differences may influence physiological outcomes and experimental interpretations. This study aimed to compare the metabolic profile of C57BL/6 mice fed a grain-based diet or a purified diet, both administered under normocaloric conditions. Male C57BL/6 mice (7 weeks old) were fed a grain-based diet or a purified diet for 12 weeks. Body mass and composition, fasting blood glucose, glucose tolerance, and plasma lipid profile (triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) were evaluated. Statistical analyses were conducted using an unpaired Student’s t-test (P ≤ 0.05). No significant differences were observed between groups in the evolution of body mass, body composition, fasting blood glucose, glucose tolerance, or plasma lipid parameters. Under normocaloric conditions, grain-based or purified control diets produce equivalent metabolic profiles in C57BL/6 mice, supporting their interchangeable use as control diets in metabolic research studies.

References

AGOUNI, A. et al. In vivo differential effects of fasting, re-feeding, insulin and insulin stimulation time course on insulin signaling pathway components in peripheral tissues. Biochemical And Biophysical Research Communications, [S.L.], v. 401, n. 1, p. 104-111, out. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.09.018

AHMED, L. et al. Gut microbiota modulation as a promising therapy with metformin in rats with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: role of lps/tlr4 and autophagy pathways. European Journal Of Pharmacology, [S.L.], v. 887, p. 173461, nov. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173461

AHMED, S. et al. Obesity: prevalence, causes, consequences, management, preventive strategies and future research directions. Metabolism Open, [S.L.], v. 27, p. 100375, set. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metop.2025.100375

ALMEIDA-SUHETT, C. et al. Control diet in a high-fat diet study in mice: regular chow and purified low-fat diet have similar effects on phenotypic, metabolic, and behavioral outcomes. Nutritional Neuroscience, [S.L.], v. 22, n. 1, p. 19-28, 19 jul. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2017.1349359

ANDRIKOPOULOS, S. et al. Evaluating the glucose tolerance test in mice. American Journal Of Physiology-Endocrinology And Metabolism, [S.L.], v. 295, n. 6, p. 1323-1332, dez. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.90617.2008

BECERRA-TOMÁS, N. et al. Legume consumption is inversely associated with type 2 diabetes incidence in adults: a prospective assessment from the predimed study. Clinical Nutrition, [S.L.], v. 37, n. 3, p. 906-913, jun. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.03.015

DALBY, M. et al. Dietary Uncoupling of Gut Microbiota and Energy Harvesting from Obesity and Glucose Tolerance in Mice. Cell Reports, [S.L.], v. 21, n. 6, p. 1521-1533, nov. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.056

ENGBER, D. et al. What models eat. Nature Medicine, [S.L.], v. 24, n. 6, p. 692-695, jun. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0055-1

FRIEDEWALD, W. et al. Estimation of the Concentration of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Plasma, Without Use of the Preparative Ultracentrifuge. Clinical Chemistry, [S.L.], v. 18, n. 6, p. 499-502, 1 jun. 1972. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/18.6.499

FRIEDMAN, S. et al. Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nature Medicine, [S.L.], v. 24, n. 7, p. 908-922, jul. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0104-9

LI, Q. et al. Bioactive Components in Whole Grains for the Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Function. Foods, [S.L.], v. 11, n. 18, p. 2752, 7 set. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182752

MARTINET, W. et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of macroautophagy. Autophagy, [S.L.], v. 9, n. 3, p. 386-402, 7 mar. 2013. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.22968

NAGI, M. et al. Economic costs of obesity: a systematic review. International Journal Of Obesity, [S.L.], v. 48, n. 1, p. 33-43, 26 out. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-023-01398-y

PELLIZZON, M. et al. Choice of laboratory animal diet influences intestinal health. Lab Animal, [S.L.], v. 45, n. 6, p. 238-239, 20 maio 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1014

PELLIZZON, M. et al. Effects of Rodent Diet Choice and Fiber Type on Data Interpretation of Gut Microbiome and Metabolic Disease Research. Current Protocols In Toxicology, [S.L.], v. 77, n. 1, p. 1-14, 20 jul. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/cptx.55

PELLIZZON, M. et al. The common use of improper control diets in diet-induced metabolic disease research confounds data interpretation: the fiber factor. Nutrition & Metabolism, [S.L.], v. 15, n. 1, p. 1-6, 15 jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-018-0243-5

WARDEN, C. et al. Comparisons of Diets Used in Animal Models of High-Fat Feeding. Cell Metabolism, [S.L.], v. 7, n. 4, p. 277, abr. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2008.03.014

WEICKERT, M. et al. Impact of Dietary Fiber Consumption on Insulin Resistance and the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes. The Journal Of Nutrition, [S.L.], v. 148, n. 1, p. 7-12, jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxx008

WEICKERT, M. et al. Metabolic Effects of Dietary Fiber Consumption and Prevention of Diabetes. The Journal Of Nutrition, [S.L.], v. 138, n. 3, p. 439-442, mar. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/138.3.439

WEISKIRCHEN, S. et al. All You Can Feed: some comments on production of mouse diets used in biomedical research with special emphasis on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease research. Nutrients, [S.L.], v. 12, n. 1, p. 163, 7 jan. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010163

WISE, A. et al. The variability of dietary fibre in laboratory animal diets and its relevance to the control of experimental conditions. Food And Cosmetics Toxicology, [S.L.], v. 18, n. 6, p. 643-648, jan. 1980. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-6264(80)80013-7

YAO, B. et al. Dietary fiber intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: a dose⠳response analysis of prospective studies. European Journal Of Epidemiology, [S.L.], v. 29, n. 2, p. 79-88, 5 jan. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-013-9876-x

Downloads

Published

01/27/2026

How to Cite

ALMEIDA, J. S. de; ANDREOTTI, S.; NUNES DE CAMARGO, F.; CRISTINA MEDEIROS KOMINO, A.; CARVALHO, C. R. de O. Comparative metabolic profile of mice fed a grain-based controlled diet and a purified controlled diet. Brazilian Journal of Health Review, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. e85341, 2026. DOI: 10.34119/bjhrv9n1-108. Disponível em: https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/85341. Acesso em: 20 oct. 2026.

Issue

Section

Original Papers