An internet-based intervention for chronic low back pain in primary health care for low- and middle-income individuals: a mixed methods feasibility study protocol (TECLI study)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv8n6-373Keywords:
low back pain, feasibility, telehealth, exercise, pain education, randomized controlled trialAbstract
Background: Nonspecific chronic low back pain (LBP) is a major contributor to disability and economic burden worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income regions. Telehealth has emerged as a promising approach to improving healthcare accessibility and treatment effectiveness. This study aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness and equity of a telehealth-delivered exercise and pain education program compared to an in-person intervention and a waitlist control group. Methods: This protocol describes a feasibility study with a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, developed to inform a future three-arm RCT with economic evaluation. A total of 39 participants with chronic non-specific LBP will be recruited from Fortaleza, Brazil. Key feasibility indicators (e.g., recruitment rate, adherence, acceptability) and clinical outcomes (pain intensity, disability, quality of life, etc.) will be assessed at baseline and post-treatment (8 weeks). Discussion: The integrated findings will determine the feasibility of proceeding with a definitive trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and equity of this telehealth model. This study is crucial for developing and scaling up evidence-based telehealth strategies that are not only effective, but also affordable and accessible for vulnerable populations with chronic low back pain in low-resource settings. Trial Registration: www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br (RBR-4d7kgrw) on April 2, 2024.
References
World Health Organization. WHO guideline for non-surgical management of chronic primary low back pain in adults in primary and community care settings. 2023.
Corwell BN, Davis NL. The emergent evaluation and treatment of neck and back pain. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2020;38(1):167–91. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2019.09.007.
Dhondt E, Van Oosterwijck J, Cagnie B, Adnan R, Schouppe S, Van Akeleyen J, et al. Predicting treatment adherence and outcome to outpatient multimodal rehabilitation in chronic low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2020;33(2):277–93. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181125.
Furlan AD, Imamura M, Dryden T, Irvin E. Massage for low back pain: an updated systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 15;34(16):1669-84. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ad7bd6. PMID: 19561560.
Freburger JK, Holmes GM, Agans RP, Jackman AM, Darter JD, Wallace AS, et al. The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(3):251–8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.543.
Nicholas M, Vlaeyen JWS, Rief W, et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic primary pain. Pain. 2019;160(1):28–37. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001390.
Carregaro RL, Tottoli CR, Rodrigues DDS, Bosmans JE, da Silva EN, van Tulder M. Low back pain should be considered a health and research priority in Brazil: Lost productivity and healthcare costs between 2012 to 2016. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0230902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230902.
Carvalho RMC, Machado G, Araujo J, Silva J, Silva M. Prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain in Brazil: a national internet-based survey study. Braz J Pain. 2018. doi: 10.5935/2595-0118.20180063.
Burden of disease in Brazil, 1990–2016: a systematic subnational analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2018;392(10149):760–75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31221-2.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Guidelines. Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2020.
George SZ, Fritz JM, Silfies SP, Schneider MJ, Beneciuk JM, Lentz TA, et al. Interventions for the Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Revision 2021. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021;51(11):Cpg1–Cpg60. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.0304.
Bashshur R, Shannon G, Krupinski E, Grigsby J. The taxonomy of telemedicine. Telemed J E Health. 2011;17(6):484–94. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0103.
World Health Organization. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in Member States: report on the second global survey on eHealth. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
Fioratti I, Miyamoto GC, Fandim JV, Ribeiro CPP, Batista GD, Freitas GE, et al. Feasibility, usability, and implementation context of an internet-based pain education and exercise program for chronic musculoskeletal pain: Pilot trial of the ReabilitaDOR program. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(8):e35743. doi: 10.2196/35743.
Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S, et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2356–67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X.
Wang X, Hunter DJ, Vesentini G, Pozzobon D, Ferreira ML. Technology-assisted rehabilitation following total knee or hip replacement for people with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2900-x.
de Oliveira Lima L, Saragiotto BT, Costa LOP, Nogueira LC, Meziat-Filho N, Reis FJJ. Self-guided web-based pain education for people with musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2021;101(10). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab167.
Fusco F, Turchetti G. Telerehabilitation after total knee replacement in Italy: cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a mixed telerehabilitation-standard rehabilitation program compared with usual care. BMJ Open. 2016;6(5):e009964. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009964.
Tousignant M, Moffet H, Nadeau S, Mérette C, Boissy P, Corriveau H, et al. Cost analysis of in-home telerehabilitation for post-knee arthroplasty. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(3):e83. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3844.
Estapé T, Phillip EJ, Bergerot CD. Use of telehealth and eHealth technologies in patient care by psycho-oncology service providers in low-middle-income countries during the COVID-19. Psychooncology. 2022;31(2):334-7. doi:10.1002/pon.5797.
Kyei KA, Onajah GN, Daniels J. The emergence of telemedicine in a low-middle-income country: challenges and opportunities. Ecancermedicalscience. 2024;18:1679. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1679.
Williams S, Barnard A, Collis P, et al. Remote consultations in primary care across low-, middle- and high-income countries: Implications for policy and care delivery. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2023;28(3):181-9. doi:10.1177/13558196221140318.
Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990–2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2023;401(10381):1511-34. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00421-9.
Fernandes LG, Oliveira RFF, Barros PM, Fagundes FRC, Soares RJ, Saragiotto BT. Physical therapists and public perceptions of telerehabilitation: An online open survey on acceptability, preferences, and needs. Braz J Phys Ther. 2022;26(6):100464. doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100464.
Reis FJJ, Nijs J, Parker R, Sharma S, Wideman TH. Culture and musculoskeletal pain: strategies, challenges, and future directions to develop culturally sensitive physical therapy care. Braz J Phys Ther. 2022;26(5):100442. doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100442.
Reis FJJ, Fernandes LG, Saragiotto BT. Telehealth in low- and middle-income countries: Bridging the gap or exposing health disparities? Health Policy Technol. 2021;10(4):100577. doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100577.
Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45(5):626-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008.
Story DA, Leslie K, French C. Feasibility and pilot studies: small steps before giant leaps. Anesth Intensive Care. 2018;46(1):11-2. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1804600103.
Van Teijlingen E, Hundley V. The importance of pilot studies. Nurs Stand. 2002;16(40):33-6. doi: 10.7748/ns2002.06.16.40.33.c3214.
Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016;2:64. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8.
O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
Leite MN, Hoffmann TC, Helal L, Umpierre D, Yamato TP. Helping to know about the intervention: The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist is now available in Brazilian Portuguese. Braz J Phys Ther. 2023;27(1):100483. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100483.
Machado CV, Baptista TWF, Nogueira CO. Health policies in Brazil in the 2000s: the national priority agenda. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2011;27(3):521–532. doi:10.1590/S0102-311X2011000300012.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Especializada e Temática. Unidade de Pronto Atendimento (UPA 24h): informações para gestores municipais [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; [s.d.]. Available from: <https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/saude-de-a-a-z/u/upa-24h>
Instituto de Pesquisa e Estratégia Econômica do Ceará (IPECE). Perfil municipal: Fortaleza [Internet]. Fortaleza: Governo do Estado do Ceará; 2020. Disponível em: https://www.ipece.ce.gov.br.
Paim J, Travassos C, Almeida C, Bahia L, Macinko J. The Brazilian health system: history, advances, and challenges. Lancet. 2011;377(9779):1778-1797. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60054-8.
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). Institute of Research and Economic Strategy of Ceará (IPECE); Municipal Profile of Fortaleza: Spatial Distribution of Personal Income. Available at: https://www.ipece.ce.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2018/09/Ipece_Informe_42_outubro_2012.pdf.
Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, et al. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain. 2019;160(1):19-27. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001384.
Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Pozzi GC, et al. Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: which one is the best? Spine. 2008;33(22):2459-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181849dbe.
Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira PH, Pozzi GC, Ribeiro RN. Psychometric characteristics of the Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the Functional Rating Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Aug 1;32(17):1902-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811eab33.
Dalleck LC, Taylor J. Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (ACSM). In: Encyclopedia of Lifestyle Medicine & Health [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2020 Apr 15].
Reis FJJ, Bengaly AGC, Valentim JCP, Santos LC, Martins EF, O'Keeffe M, et al. An E-Pain intervention to spread modern pain education in Brazil. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017;21(5):305-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.06.020.
Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat. 2005;4:287-91. doi:10.1002/pst.185.
Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman CL, Bond CM, et al. Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomised controlled trials: development of a conceptual framework. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0150205. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150205.
Avery KNL, Williamson PR, Gamble C, Francischetto EO, Metcalfe C, Davidson P, et al. Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e013537. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013537.
Nusbaum L, Natour J, Ferraz MB, Goldenberg J. Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire—Brazil Roland-Morris. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2001;34(2):203-10. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2001000200007.
Kamper SJ, Ostelo RW, Knol DL, Maher CG, de Vet HC, Hancock MJ. Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):760-6.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.009.
Ferraz MB, Nardi EP, Campolina AG. A comparison of UK and Brazilian SF-6D preference weights when applied to a Brazilian urban population. Value Health Reg Issues. 2019;20:21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.10.009.
Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville AJ. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41(5):545-7. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547.
Zadro JR, Needs C, Foster NE, et al. Feasibility of delivering and evaluating stratified care integrated with telehealth ('Rapid Stratified Telehealth') for participants with low back pain: protocol for a feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e056339. Published 2022 Jan 11. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056339
