Advancements in radiosurgery for the treatment of arteriovenous malformations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv7n5-164Keywords:
arteriovenous malformations, stereotactic radiosurgery, radiotherapy, neurosurgeryAbstract
Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex vascular anomalies with high risks of hemorrhage and neurological deficits. The evolution of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) represents a significant advancement in their management, offering a less invasive alternative to traditional surgical approaches. This study aims to evaluate recent developments in SRS techniques for treating AVMs by conducting an integrative literature review. Utilizing the PICO strategy, a systematic search was performed across databases like LILACS, MEDLINE, and SCIELO, focusing on clinical trials, observational studies, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The analysis revealed that while microsurgical excision remains a definitive approach, SRS—particularly with advanced systems like Gamma Knife, Linac, CyberKnife, and Zap-X—has shown promising results in reducing hemorrhage rates and lesion volumes with lower complications. The findings indicate that SRS, bolstered by improved imaging and radiation precision, provides a viable alternative to invasive methods, though its effectiveness varies among different systems. This review underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach in AVM management, emphasizing tailored treatment strategies based on lesion characteristics and patient-specific factors.
References
AL-SHAHI, R. et al. Prospective, population-based detection of intracranial vascular malformations in adults: the Scottish Intracranial Vascular Malformation Study (SIVMS). Stroke, v. 34, n. 5, p. 1163–1169, 1 maio 2003.
AL-SHAHI, R.; WARLOW, C. A systematic review of the frequency and prognosis of arteriovenous malformations of the brain in adults. Brain : a journal of neurology, v. 124, n. Pt 10, p. 1900–1926, 2001.
ANDREWS, D. W. et al. Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial. Lancet (London, England), v. 363, n. 9422, p. 1665–1672, 22 maio 2004.
BAISDEN, J. M. et al. Helical TomoTherapy in the treatment of central nervous system metastasis. Neurosurgical focus, v. 22, n. 3, 2007.
BALAGAMWALA, E. H. et al. Introduction to radiotherapy and standard teletherapy techniques. Developments in ophthalmology, v. 52, p. 1–14, 2013.
BARR, J. C.; OGILVY, C. S. Selection of treatment modalities or observation of arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery clinics of North America, v. 23, n. 1, p. 63–75, jan. 2012.
COLOMBO, F. et al. External stereotactic irradiation by linear accelerator. Neurosurgery, v. 16, n. 2, p. 154–160, 1985.
DERDEYN, C. P. et al. Management of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, v. 48, n. 8, p. e200–e224, 1 ago. 2017.
EVANS, R. W. Diagnostic testing for the evaluation of headaches. Neurologic clinics, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1–26, 1996.
FLEMMING, K. D.; LANZINO, G. Management of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Cerebrovascular Malformations. Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.), v. 23, n. 1, Cerebrovascular Disease, p. 181–210, 1 fev. 2017.
GARCIN, B. et al. Epileptic seizures at initial presentation in patients with brain arteriovenous malformation. Neurology, v. 78, n. 9, p. 626–631, 28 fev. 2012.
GROSS, B. A.; DU, R. Natural history of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a meta-analysis. Journal of neurosurgery, v. 118, n. 2, p. 437–443, fev. 2013.
KIM, B. S. et al. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brainstem Cavernous Malformations: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World neurosurgery, v. 130, p. e648–e659, 1 out. 2019.
KRINGS, T. et al. Partial “targeted” embolisation of brain arteriovenous malformations. European radiology, v. 20, n. 11, p. 2723–2731, nov. 2010.
KUO, J. S. et al. The CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery system: description, installation, and an initial evaluation of use and functionality. Neurosurgery, v. 53, n. 5, p. 1235–1239, 2003.
LEBER, K. A.; BERGLÖFF, J.; PENDL, G. Dose-response tolerance of the visual pathways and cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus to stereotactic radiosurgery. Journal of neurosurgery, v. 88, n. 1, p. 43–50, 1998.
LEKSELL L. The stereotaxic method and radiosurgery of the brain. Acta chirurgica Scandinavica, v. 4, p. 316–319, 1951.
MACIUNAS, R. J.; GALLOWAY, R. L.; LATIMER, J. W. The application accuracy of stereotactic frames. Neurosurgery, v. 35, n. 4, p. 682–695, 1994.
MEHRENS, H. et al. The current status and shortcomings of stereotactic radiosurgery. Neuro-oncology Advances, v. 4, n. 1, 1 jan. 2022.
MENDEL, J. T. et al. Expanded Radiosurgery Capabilities Utilizing Gamma Knife IconTM. Cureus, v. 13, n. 3, 19 mar. 2021.
MUÑOZ-SOLANO, J.; GALLEGO-PINAZO, R.; ARÉVALO, J. F. Arteriovenous Malformations of the Central Nervous System. Retinal and Choroidal Vascular Diseases of the Eye, p. 333–344, 4 mar. 2024.
PAN, L. et al. The Zap-X Radiosurgical System in the Treatment of Intracranial Tumors: A Technical Case Report. Neurosurgery, v. 88, n. 4, p. E351–E355, 1 abr. 2021.
RAYMOND, J. et al. Endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: clinical outcomes of patients included in the registry of a pragmatic randomized trial. Journal of neurosurgery, v. 138, n. 5, p. 1393–1402, 1 maio 2022.
SCHWARTZ, M. Stereotactic radiosurgery: comparing different technologies. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal, v. 158, n. 5, p. 625, 3 mar. 1998.
SPETZLER, R. F.; MARTIN, N. A. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. Journal of neurosurgery, v. 65, n. 4, p. 476–483, 1986.
YANG, I. et al. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Neurosurgical Patients: A Historical Review and Current Perspectives. World neurosurgery, v. 122, p. 522–531, 1 fev. 2019.
