Approach to synchronous liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma - results from a Portuguese reference center


  • Ana Isabel da Silva Ruivo
  • Jéssica Alexandra Marques Monteiro
  • Bárbara Oliveiros Paiva
  • Rui Caetano Oliveira
  • Ricardo Martins
  • José Guilherme Tralhão



colorectal neoplasm, neoplasm metastasis, surgical oncology


About 15%-25% of patients with colorectal cancer, have synchronous liver metastases. The best surgical approach for the patients with asymptomatic primary colorectal tumor and synchronous liver metastases is still the subject of much debate. We aimed to evaluate the perioperative and long-term results as well as to identify possible prognostic factors of the two strategies:  liver- first and synchronous resection. Observational, retrospective study, which included patients with synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer, who underwent liver surgery between January 2016 and December 2021, in a Portuguese reference center. Patients were divided into two groups according to the therapeutic approach (synchronous resections vs Liver First) and into three groups according to the hepatic tumor burden (single liver lesion versus more than three liver lesions versus bilobar lesions). To determine the overall and disease-free survival, Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were performed and, to identify factors with an impact on the prognosis, a univariate and multivariate analysis were performed with the application of Cox regression (significance of 5%). Among the 46 patients included, 54,4% underwent the liver-first approach and 21 patients (45.7%) underwent simultaneous resection. The liver-first group had a greater number of patients with primary rectal tumor (84% vs.14.3%; p<0.001), with more than 3 hepatic lesions (56% vs.14%; p=0.004) and with more extensive hepatic resection. As for postoperative morbimortality, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two approaches (p=0.514). The median overall survival was similar even when considering the hepatic tumor burden (35.0 months (95%CI 15.91- 54.09) in the liver-first group vs. 48.0 months (95%CI 21.69-74.96) in the synchronous resection group; p=0.145). The same was observed for the median disease-free survival (16.0 months (95% CI 0-32.7) vs. 23.0 months (95% CI 16.3-29.7) p=0.651, respectively). The two strategies showed similar morbidity. No statistically significant difference was observed with regard to overall and disease-free survival even when the hepatic tumor burden was considered. One-year and three-year survival were also similar. However, it should be stressed that, the choice of the surgical approach for each group did not took into account the hepatic tumor burden, which we believe it is essential in choosing the best surgical approach.The existence of a multidisciplinary team is fundamental for the therapeutic success of these patients.


Global Cancer Observatory [Internet]. Estimated age-standardized incidence and mortality rates (World) in 2020, World, both sexes, all ages. [cited 2023 Mar 1].Availablefrom:

Frühling P, Strömberg C, Isaksson B, Urdzik J. A comparison of the simultaneous, liverfirst, and colorectal-first strategies for surgical treatment of synchronous colorectal liver metastases at two major liver-surgery institutions in Sweden. HPB. 2023 Jan 1;25(1):26–36.

Giuliante F, Viganò L, De Rose AM, Mirza DF, Lapointe R, Kaiser G, et al. Liver-First Approach for Synchronous Colorectal Metastases: Analysis of 7360 Patients from the LiverMetSurvey Registry. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;

Carbone F, Chee Y, Rasheed S, Cunningham D, Bhogal RH, Jiao L, et al. Which surgical strategy for colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases provides the best outcome? A comparison between primary first, liver first and simultaneous approach. Updates Surg. 2022 Apr 1;74(2):451–65.

Ihnát P, Vávra P, Zonča P. Treatment strategies for colorectal carcinoma with synchronous liver metastases: Which way to go? World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG [Internet]. 2015 Jun 6 [cited 2022 May 22];21(22):7014. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC4462744/

Birrer DL, Tschuor C, Reiner C, Fritsch R, Pfammatter T, Garcia Schüler H, et al. Multimodal treatment strategies for colorectal liver metastases. Vol. 151, Swiss medical weekly. NLM (Medline); 2021. p. w20390.

Chan AKC, Mason JM, Baltatzis M, Siriwardena AK, Sheen AJ, O’Reilly DA, et al. Management of Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: An Inception Cohort Study (CoSMIC). Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar 1;29(3):1939–51.

Nitsche U, Weber C, Kaufmann B, Figura G Von, Assfalg V, Miller G, et al. ScienceDirect Simultaneous Versus Staged Resection of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. 2020;0.

Martin J, Petrillo A, Smyth EC, Shaida N, Khwaja S, Cheow H, et al. Colorectal liver metastases: Current management and future perspectives. World J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 24;11(10):761–808.

Cetin B, Bilgetekin I, Cengiz M, Ozet A. Managing Synchronous Liver Metastases in Colorectal Cancer. Vol. 9, Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology. Springer; 2018. p. 461–

van de Geest TW, van Amerongen MJ, Nierop PMH, Höppener DJ, Grünhagen DJ, Moelker A, et al. Propensity score matching demonstrates similar results for radiofrequency ablation compared to surgical resection in colorectal liver metastases. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2022 Jun 1;48(6):1368–74.

Hof J, Joosten HJ, Havenga K, De Jong KP. Radiofrequency ablation is beneficial in simultaneous treatment of synchronous liver metastases and primary colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 1;13(3).

Mattar RE, Al-Alem F, Simoneau E, Hassanain M. Preoperative selection of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis for hepatic resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(2):567–81.

Zhai S, Sun X, Du L, Chen K, Zhang S, Shi Y, et al. Role of Surgical Approach to Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Retrospective Analysis. 2021; Available from:

Mentha G, Majno PE, Andres A, Rubbia-Brandt L, Morel P, Roth AD. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection of advanced synchronous liver metastases before treatment of the colorectal primary. Br J Surg [Internet]. 2006 Jul [cited 2022 Jun 10];93(7):872–8. Available from:

Wang S hao, Song L, Tang J yan, Sun W peng, Li Z. Safety and long-term prognosis of simultaneous versus staged resection in synchronous colorectal cancer with liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 27, European Journal of Medical Research. BioMed Central Ltd; 2022.

Huang L, Tang X, Fang J, Zheng Z, Wei H. Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases considering Infectious Complications: Simultaneous or Delayed Surgery? Evidencebased Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2022;2022.

Adam R, de Gramont A, Figueras J, Kokudo N, Kunstlinger F, Loyer E, et al. Managing synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer: A multidisciplinary international consensus. Vol. 41, Cancer Treatment Reviews. W.B. Saunders Ltd; 2015. p. 729–41.

Slesser AAP, Simillis C, Goldin R, Brown G, Mudan S, Tekkis PP. A meta-analysis comparing simultaneous versus delayed resections in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases. Vol. 22, Surgical Oncology. 2013. p. 36–47.

Larsson AL, Björnsson B, Jung B, Hallböök O, Vernmark K, Berg K, et al. Simultaneous or staged resection of synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases: a 13-year institutional follow-up. HPB. 2022 Jul 1;24(7):1091–9.

Slesser AAP, Chand M, Goldin R, Brown G, Tekkis PP, Mudan S. Outcomes of simultaneous resections for patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2013 Dec;39(12):1384–93.




How to Cite

Ruivo, A. I. da S., Monteiro, J. A. M., Paiva, B. O., Oliveira, R. C., Martins, R., & Tralhão, J. G. (2023). Approach to synchronous liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma - results from a Portuguese reference center. Brazilian Journal of Health Review, 6(6), 26993–27012.



Original Papers