Avanços nas abordagens cirúrgicas na doença inflamatória intestinal: explorando técnicas modernas e resultados clínicos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv6n4-296Keywords:
doença inflamatória intestinal, cirurgia minimamente invasiva, cirurgia laparoscópica, cirurgia robótica, gestão de DIIAbstract
Este artigo revisa as recentes evoluções nas abordagens cirúrgicas para a doença inflamatória intestinal (DII), destacando o impacto e os benefícios das técnicas minimamente invasivas, como a cirurgia laparoscópica e robótica. Fornecemos uma visão abrangente dos principais estudos que comparam as intervenções cirúrgicas convencionais e modernas em termos de eficácia, segurança, recuperação do paciente e qualidade de vida. Os resultados indicam que as técnicas minimamente invasivas podem proporcionar melhorias significativas nos resultados dos pacientes, incluindo recuperação mais rápida, menor dor pós-operatória, menor tempo de internação e melhor qualidade de vida. No entanto, a implementação dessas técnicas apresenta desafios, incluindo a necessidade de treinamento especializado e a gestão de custos associados. Este artigo ressalta a importância de mais pesquisas para otimizar a implementação dessas técnicas e para esclarecer o seu papel na gestão da DII.References
BARTELS, S. A., et al. (2013). Significantly increased pregnancy rates after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a cross-sectional study. Annals of Surgery, 258(6), 877-883.
BEMELMAN, W. A., et al. (2019). Surgical approach to ulcerative colitis: when is it time and how to do it? Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, 13(Supplement_1), S646-S652.
BEMELMAN, W. A., & WARUSAVITARNE, J. (2014). Surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology Report, 2(3), 178-187.
BILLIOUD, V., et al. (2011). Perioperative outcome of laparoscopic versus open surgery in patients with Crohn's disease: a case-matched study. Surgical Endoscopy, 25(6), 1817-1823.
BUCHER, P., et al. (2008). Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 23(10), 1013-1016.
CIMA, R. R., & PEMBERTON, J. H. (2005). Medical and surgical management of chronic ulcerative colitis. Archives of Surgery, 140(3), 300-310.
COFFEY, C. J., et al. (2014). Inclusion of the mesentery in ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease is associated with reduced surgical recurrence. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, 8(10), 1406-1414.
COFFEY, J. C., et al. (2018). The effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery on surgeons: a systematic review. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 12(4), 567-578.
DE BUCK VAN OVERSTRAETEN, A., et al. (2017). Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopy for right colectomy? Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A, 27(6), 609-615.
ESHUIS, E. J., et al. (2010). Long-term outcomes following laparoscopically assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. The British Journal of Surgery, 97(4), 563-568.
FICHÉRA, A., et al. (2007). Laparoscopic resection in inflammatory bowel disease: a review. Minerva Chirurgica, 62(5), 437-446.
FROLKIS, A. D., et al. (2013). Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel diseases has decreased over time: A systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Gastroenterology, 145(5), 996-1006.
GASH, K. J., et al. (2011). Patient recovery following laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with intermittent epidural analgesia: a prospective study. Colorectal Disease, 13(2), e14-20.
KESSLER, H., et al. (2018). Robotic-assisted proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reduces rate of conversion to open surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 32(9), 3972-3978.
KIM, M. J., et al. (2012). Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery vs open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Colorectal Disease, 14(7), e393-401.
KIRAN, R. P., et al. (2020). Long-term outcomes and complications following surgery for Crohn's disease. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, 14(3), 341-350.
KWIATT, M., et al. (2013). Emergent applications of robotic technology for colorectal surgery. Techniques in Coloproctology, 17(3), 285-290.
LEE, E. C., et al. (2014). The benefits of laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: a case-matched study. Surgical Endoscopy, 28(9), 2701-2705.
LEE, G. H., et al. (2019). Laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 34(7), 1207-1219.
LOWNEY, J. K., et al. (2006). Predictive factors for surgical options in patients with Crohn's disease. Archives of Surgery, 141(3), 216-221.
MAARTENSE, S., et al. (2006). Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Annals of Surgery, 244(6), 984-991.
MILSOM, J. W., et al. (1998). Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy. Annals of Surgery, 228(5), 684-689.
MOGHADAMYEGHANEH, Z., et al. (2016). Outcomes of conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery. JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 20(1), e2015.00095.
NARULA, N., et al. (2016). Surgical rates for Crohn's disease are decreasing: a population-based time trend analysis and validation study. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 111(12), 1822-1830.
RAWLINGS, A. L., et al. (2007). Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surgical Endoscopy, 21(10), 1701-1708.
SAHNAN, K., et al. (2018). Innovations in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: a review of recent advances in surgical techniques and devices. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, 24(6), 1186-1196.
STOCCHI, L., et al. (2008). Safety and advantages of laparoscopic ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease. Surgical Endoscopy, 22(2), 275-280.
TRUELOVE, S. C., & WITTS, L. J. (1955). Corticisone in ulcerative colitis; final report on a therapeutic trial. British Medical Journal, 2(4947), 1041-1048.
