Avanços nas técnicas minimamente invasivas na abordagem de hérnias abdominais: uma revisão dos procedimentos, inovações e resultados clínicos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv6n4-056Keywords:
hérnia abdominal, técnicas minimamente invasivas, laparoscopia, cirurgia assistida por robótica, abordagens lararoscópicasAbstract
A reparação de hérnias abdominais é uma prática comum em cirurgia geral, com a abordagem minimamente invasiva sendo cada vez mais preferida por suas vantagens em termos de recuperação pós-operatória e resultados clínicos. Esta revisão buscou avaliar os avanços e resultados clínicos das técnicas minimamente invasivas, incluindo a laparoscopia, cirurgia assistida por robótica (RAS) e abordagens laparoscópicas (TEP e TAPP). Cada uma dessas técnicas apresenta vantagens distintas, como a diminuição da dor pós-operatória, menores taxas de infecção do sítio cirúrgico e menor tempo de recuperação. No entanto, o treinamento especializado e o alto custo dos equipamentos necessários são barreiras que precisam ser enfrentadas. A pesquisa continua a avaliar e aprimorar essas técnicas, com inovações promissoras como novos materiais de malha e técnicas de fixação sem sutura. Embora essas técnicas mostrem resultados promissores, mais estudos são necessários para avaliar sua eficácia em hérnias complexas ou de grande tamanho.References
AUTORINO, R. et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol, v. 59, n. 1, p. 26-45, 2011.
BARBASH, G. I.; GLIED, S. A. New technology and health care costs — the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med, v. 363, n. 8, p. 701-704, 2010.
BITTNER, R. et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal Hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc, v. 25, n. 9, p. 2773-2843, 2011.
BITTNER, R. et al. Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society). Surg Endosc, v. 29, n. 2, p. 289-321, 2015.
CHUNG, L. et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with a painless inguinal hernia from a randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg, v. 98, n. 4, p. 596-599, 2011.
CRAWFORD, D. L.; HIATT, J. R.; PHILLIPS, E. H. Laparoscopy identifies unexpected groin hernias. Am Surg, v. 64, n. 10, p. 976-978, 1998.
CORCIONE, F. et al. Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc, v. 19, n. 1, p. 117-119, 2005.
DEEBA, S. et al. Laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia. Lessons learned from 270 patients. Hernia, v. 11, n. 1, p. 41-45, 2007.
DULUCQ, J. L. et al. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3,100 hernia repairs over 15 years. Surg Endosc, v. 23, n. 3, p. 482-486, 2009.
EDWARDS, C. et al. Changes in abdominal wall mechanics after laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia. Am J Surg, v. 187, n. 6, p. 695-700, 2004.
EKER, H. H. et al. Laparoscopic vs. open incisional hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg, v. 148, n. 3, p. 259-263, 2013.
EKUND, A. et al. Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg, v. 93, n. 9, p. 1060-1068, 2006.
FELIX, E. et al. Causes of recurrence after laparoscopic hernioplasty. A multicenter study. Surg Endosc, v. 12, n. 3, p. 226-231, 1998.
GRANTCHAROV, T. P. et al. Virtual reality computer simulation. Surg Endosc, v. 17, n. 2, p. 242-244, 2003.
GRANTCHAROV, T. P. et al. Virtual reality computer simulation. Surg Endosc, v. 17, n. 2, p. 242-244, 2003.
HERNANDEZ-IRIZARRY, R. et al. Trends in emergent inguinal hernia surgery in Olmsted County, MN: a population-based study. Hernia, v. 16, n. 4, p. 397-403, 2012.
HOLIHAN, J. L. et al. Mesh location in open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Surg, v. 40, n. 1, p. 89-99, 2016.
KINGSNORTH, A.; LEBLANC, K. Hérnias: inguinal and abdominal. Muscle Nerve, v. 27, n. 5, p. 549-569, 2003.
KURIAN, A. et al. Laparoscopic repair of primary versus recurrent hernia: are there differences in the outcome? Surg Endosc, v. 24, n. 4, p. 846-850, 2010.
LEE, J. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc, v. 32, n. 1, p. 335-341, 2018.
LEBLANC, K. A. Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: complications-how to avoid and handle. Hernia, v. 8, n. 4, p. 323-331, 2004.
LEBLANC, K. A.; BOOTH, W. V. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc, v. 3, n. 1, p. 39-41, 1993.
LEBLANC, K. A. Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: complications-how to avoid and handle. Hernia, v. 8, n. 4, p. 323-331, 2004.
LIEM, M. S. et al. Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair. N Engl J Med, v. 336, n. 22, p. 1541-1547, 1997.
MAIO, A.; BRESCIA, A. Minimally invasive abdominal surgery: lux et veritas past, present, and future. Am J Surg, v. 192, n. 2, p. 232-235, 2006.
MCCORMACK, K. et al. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, n. 1, CD001785, 2003.
MCCORMACK, K. et al. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) vs totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review. Hernia, v. 9, n. 2, p. 109-114, 2005.
MISEREZ, M. et al. Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia, v. 18, n. 2, p. 151-163, 2014.
NEUMAYER, L. et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med, v. 350, n. 18, p. 1819-1827, 2004.
PISANU, A. et al. Meta-analysis and review of prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein techniques in recurrent inguinal hernia repair. Hernia, v. 19, n. 3, p. 355-366, 2015.
REARDON, P. R. et al. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy in the community. Am J Surg, v. 177, n. 5, p. 373-376, 1999.
ROSENBERG, J. et al. Danish Hernia Database recommendations for the management of inguinal and femoral hernia in adults. Dan Med Bull, v. 58, n. 2, C4243, 2011.
RUTKOW, I. M. Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am, v. 83, n. 5, p. 1045-1051, v-vi, 2003.
SCHOUTEN, N. et al. Is routine use of mesh in laparoscopic repair of primary small umbilical and epigastric hernias justified? A multicenter randomized double-blind controlled trial (HOMEPAGE trial). Ann Surg, v. 273, n. 2, p. 261-267, 2021.
SIMONS, M. P. et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia, v. 13, n. 4, p. 343-403, 2009.
STOPPA, R. E. The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World J Surg, v. 13, n. 5, p. 545-554, 1989.
SWANSTROM, L. L.; SOPER, N. J. Mastery of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014.
TASTALDI, L. et al. Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The World's Largest Single-Institution Experience. Surg Endosc, v. 33, n. 11, p. 3505-3510, 2019.
