Fabrication of a removable partial denture of injectable poly (ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) made partially by a digital workflow: case report

Authors

  • Míria Rafaelli Souza Curinga
  • Gabriel Gomes da Silva
  • Ana Larisse Carneiro Pereira
  • Rodrigo Falcão Carvalho Porto de Freitas
  • Adriana da Fonte Porto Carreiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv6n1-312

Keywords:

removable partial denture, biomedical and dental materials, polymers, technology, computer-aided design

Abstract

The introduction of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing in rehabilitation with removable partial denture, enabled the emergence of new methods of fabrication of the framework and materials. In view of this, polyether-ether-ketone appears as an alternative to Cobalt-Chromium, due to its aesthetic properties, high resistance and for being non-allergic. In this sense, the present study aimed to report a clinical case where the framework of a removable partial denture was manufactured from a digital workflow, using polyether-ether-ketone as the material of choice, compared to a removable partial denture made with a cobalt-chromium framework. In this case, it was possible to perceive that the use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing technology for the construction of a removable partial denture framework of polyether-ether-ketone resulted in a denture with adequate adaptation and good aesthetics. Patient satisfaction, comfort, retention, number of follow-up sessions, masticatory performance and quality of life were evaluated. Compared with the conventional denture, the polyether-ether-ketone framework denture provided better satisfaction and comfort. Both prostheses showed similar results in terms of masticatory performance and in terms of quality of life, however the polyether-ether-ketone framework denture showed better results. In conclusion, polyether-ether-ketone proved to be a viable material for making removable partial denture framework. However, controlled and randomized clinical trials are needed to demonstrate the benefits of this treatment as an alternative in relation to the conventional denture.

References

Carr AB, McGivney GP, Brown DT. McCracken's removable partial Prosthodontics. 11th Ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2004: 189-229.

Ye H, Li X, Wang G, Kang J, Liu Y, Sun Y, Zhou Y. A Novel Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Method for One-Piece Removable Partial Denture and Evaluation of Fit. Int J Prosthodont. 2018 Mar/Apr;31(2):149–151. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5508. Epub 2018 Feb 15. PMID: 29448267.

Arnold C, Hey J, Schweyen R, Setz JM. Accuracy of CAD-CAM-fabricated removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Apr;119(4):586-592. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Jul 11. PMID: 28709674.

Sagomonyants KB, Jarman-Smith ML, Devine JN, Aronow MS, Gronowicz GA. The in vitro response of human osteoblasts to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) substrates compared to commercially pure titanium. Biomaterials. 2008 Apr;29(11):1563-72. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.001. Epub 2008 Jan 15. PMID: 18199478.

Carneiro Pereira AL, Martins de Aquino LM, Carvalho Porto de Freitas RF, Soares Paiva Tôrres AC, da Fonte Porto Carreiro A. CAD/CAM-fabricated removable partial dentures: a case report. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(4):371-379. PMID: 31840145.

Ali Z, Baker S, Sereno N, Martin N. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial Comparing Early OHRQoL Outcomes of Cobalt-Chromium Versus PEEK Removable Partial Denture Frameworks. Int J Prosthodont. 2020 Jul/Aug;33(4):386-392. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6604. PMID: 32639698.

El Mekawy N, Elgamal M. Retention Assessment of High Performance Poly-etheretherketone Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Constructed by Various Techniques (in vitro Study). J Dent (Shiraz). 2021 Dec;22(4):281-289. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.87488.1265. PMID: 34904125; PMCID: PMC8665443.

Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;25(4):284-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x. PMID: 9332805.

Giachetti L, Sarti C, Cinelli F, Russo DS. Accuracy of Digital Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies. Int J Prosthodont. 2020 Mar/Apr;33(2):192-201. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6468. PMID: 32069344.

Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, Takafuji K, Takahashi T, Yokota J, Oriso K, Kondo H. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review. J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Apr;64(2):109-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Aug 30. PMID: 31474576.

Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, Farges JC, Fages M, Ducret M. Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression. J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:8427595. doi: 10.1155/2017/8427595. Epub 2017 Sep 5. PMID: 29065652; PMCID: PMC5605789.

Vandenberghe B. The digital patient - Imaging science in dentistry. J Dent. 2018 Jul;74 Suppl 1:S21-S26. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.019. PMID: 29929585.

Zaruba M, Mehl A. Chairside systems: a current review. Int J Comput Dent. 2017;20(2):123-149. PMID: 28630955.

Suese K. Progress in digital dentistry: The practical use of intraoral scanners. Dent Mater J. 2020 Jan 31;39(1):52-56. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-224. Epub 2019 Nov 14. PMID: 31723066.

Fung L, Brisebois P. Implementing Digital Dentistry into Your Esthetic Dental Practice. Dent Clin North Am. 2020 Oct;64(4):645-657. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Aug 12. PMID: 32888514.

Wesemann C, Muallah J, Mah J, Bumann A. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(1):41-50. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a37130. PMID: 27834416.

Al Jabbari YS. Physico-mechanical properties and prosthodontic applications of Co-Cr dental alloys: a review of the literature. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Apr;6(2):138-45. doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.138. Epub 2014 Apr 22. PMID: 24843400; PMCID: PMC4024559.

Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, Güth JF. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015 Mar;55:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 19. PMID: 26519658.

Downloads

Published

02/22/2023

How to Cite

CURINGA, M. R. S.; DA SILVA, G. G.; PEREIRA, A. L. C.; DE FREITAS, R. F. C. P.; CARREIRO, A. da F. P. Fabrication of a removable partial denture of injectable poly (ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) made partially by a digital workflow: case report. Brazilian Journal of Health Review, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 4027–4039, 2023. DOI: 10.34119/bjhrv6n1-312. Disponível em: https://ojs.brazilianjournals.com.br/ojs/index.php/BJHR/article/view/57476. Acesso em: 18 oct. 2026.

Issue

Section

Original Papers