Odontological assistance in Pre-Natal: Construction and validation of a primary care instrument/ Assistência odontológica no Pré-Natal: construção e validação de um instrumento para atenção básica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34115/basrv5n2-029Palavras-chave:
Dental Care, Pre Natal Care, Validation Studies.Resumo
Dental care during prenatal care is extremely important to prevent oral health problems and is provided by the Ministry of Health in the Primary Care Network. A descriptive study was conducted to develop and validate a specific questionnaire to investigation these services. The tool developed was composed of 17 items and submitted to the evaluation of 10 doctors specializing in health. Responses were analyzed using the content validity index (CVI) and calculated individually for each item, then the instrument's CVI summing them all and dividing by the total, reaching a CVI value of 0.98, which means that the content of the instrument makes it possible to measure what it proposes. The percentage of agreement of all judges for all items of 94.1% was analyzed. The changes suggested by the judges were fully accepted. Subsequently, the version of the instrument was applied to the target population as a pretest. 37 women were invited to answer the questions, which were analyzed according to a Likert scale. The Cronbach's alpha (?) test was used to measure the reliability and internal consistency of the instrument, giving us a score of 0.90 ensuring a proper consistency. Given the results obtained, the proposed instrument is suitable for the evaluation of dental care services offered to pregnant women and duly validated.
Referências
Candeias NMF. Conceitos de Educação e de Promoção em Saúde: mudanças individuais e mudanças organizacionais. Rev. Saude Publica. 1997; 31(2): 209-213, 2012.
Miranda J, Lemos M, Torres M, Sovieiro V, Cruz R. Promoção de saúde bucal em odontologia: uma questão de conhecimento e motivação. Rev. do CROMG. 2000; 6(3):154-157.
Veras MSC, Sekulic E, Sabóia VPA, Almeida M I. Educação em saúde e a promoção de saúde bucal: marcos conceituais, teóricos e práticos na odontologia. Rev Odontol Univ Cid São Paulo. 2003; 15(1):55-61.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 333/03. Coletânea de Normas para o Controle Social no SUS. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2006.
Finkler M, Oleiniski D, Ramos, FRS. Saúde bucal maternoinfantil: um estudo de representações sociais com gestantes/ Preganancy and oral health: a social representation study. Texto & contexto enferm. Florianópolis. 2004; 13(3): 360-368.
Monteiro, GTR, Hora, HRM. Pesquisa em saude publica: como desenvolver e validar instrumento de coleta de dados. In:___. Pesquisa em saúde publica: como desenvolver e validar instrumentos de coleta de dados. Curitiba: Appris, 2014.
Oliveira RS, Magalhães BG, Gaspar GS, Rocha RACP, Goés PSA. Avaliação do grau de satisfação dos usuários nos serviços de saúde bucal da Estratégia de Saúde da Família. Rev Bras Pesqui Saúde. 2009; 11(4):34-8.
Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16(2):234-243.
Pasquali L. Medida psicométrica. In. Pasquali L. Teorias e métodos de medida em ciências do comportamento. Brasilia.LABPAN/INEP. 1996; 3:73-115.
Mattar, FN. Pesquisa de marketing. 6. ed. São Paulo:. Atlas, 2005.
Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing London: Routledge,1995.
Alexandre, NMC; Coluci, MZO. Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas. Ciênc. saúde coletiva [online]. 2011; 16(7): 3061-3068.
Cortina, JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1993; 78: 98-104.
Donabedian A. Basic approaches to assessment: structure, process and outcome. Michigan. Health Administration Press. 1980; 77-125.
Streiner DL. Being Inconsistent About Consistency: When Coefficient Alpha Does and Doesn’t Matter. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2003. 80(3): 217–222.
